Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:13:08.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General dispersion relation for surface waves on a plasma—vacuum interface: an image approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

G. W. Rowe
G. W. Rowe
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Sydney N.S.W. 2006, Australia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The image approach, used extensively to treat bounded unmagnetized plasmas, is extended to the case of an arbitrary homogeneous and non-magnetic medium. A general dispersion relation for electromagnetic surface waves on a plane plasma-vacuum interface is thus obtained, subject only to the suitability of the chosen boundary conditions. The boundary conditions used here are those of Barr and Boyd. It is emphasized that this dispersion relation is applicable to magnetized plasmas. The general dispersion relation is applied to the special case of an isotropie medium, and the dispersion relation of Barr and Boyd for an unmagnetized plasma is reproduced. A major assumption in the image approach is that the semi-infinite bounded medium can be described by the infinite-medium response. The validity of this assumption and of the boundary conditions is discussed. Two conditions are deduced that must be satisfied for the image theory to be self-consistent. It is argued that these can be satisfied in all situations for which the assumed boundary conditions are appropriate.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , December 1991, pp. 495 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alexandrov, A. F., Bogdankevich, L. S. & Rukhadze, A. A. 1984 Principles of Plasma Electrodynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, H. C. & Boyd, T. J. M. 1972 J. Phys. A 5, 1108.Google Scholar
Boardman, A. D. 1982 Electromagnetic Surface Modes, p. 1 (ed. Boardman, A. D.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Cheng, D. K. 1983 Field and Wave Electromagnetics. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Clemmow, P. C. & Elgin, J. 1974 J. Plasma Phys. 25, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, N. F. & Donnelly, I. J. 1983 Plasma Phys. 12, 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fano, U. 1941 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuse, M. & Ichimaru, S. 1975 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 38, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guernsey, R. L. 1969 Phys. Fluids 12, 1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. & Griffin, A. 1971 Phys. Rev. B 3, 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaw, P. K. & Mcbride, J. B. 1970 Phys. Fluids 13, 1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritz, A. H. & Mintzer, D. 1960 Phys. Rev. 117, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D. B. 1980 Plasma Astrophysics, vol. 1. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Melrose, D. B. 1986 Instabilities in Space and Laboratory Plasmas. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muskhelishvili, N. I. 1953 Singular Integral Equations. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Sitenko, A. G. 1982 Fluctuations and Non-Linear Wave Interactions in Plasmas. Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1962 The Theory of Plasma Waves. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wallis, R. F. 1982 Electromagnetic Surface Modes, p.575 (ed. Boerdman, A. D.). Wiley.Google Scholar