Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T16:31:33.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear plasma waves with steady-state d.c. current

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

S. Rauf and
J. A. Tataronis
S. Rauf
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
J. A. Tataronis
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Using a low-frequency, low-β model of a magnetized plasma, several nonlinear waves are studied. All the waves share the property that they have a self- consistent time-averaged current in the steady state. The first wave is a one- dimensional solitary wave that propagates obliquely to a static magnetic field. The wave magnetic field has a kink structure, which results in the production of the time-averaged current. A two-dimensional wave that propagates parallel to the background magnetic field is also discussed. This is a forced wave, requiring an antenna structure to support it in the steady state. The characteristics of the two-dimensional wave are dependent upon the wave speed, which in turn is determined by the speed of the travelling wave on the external antenna.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , December 1994, pp. 373 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fisch, N. J. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, N. J. 1987 Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidberg, J. P. 1989 Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics. Plenum.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, A. 1980 Nucl. fusion 20, 1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, A. & Mima, K. 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadomtsev, B. B. 1965 Plasma Turbulence. Academic.Google Scholar
Kong, J. U. 1990 Electromagnetic Wave Theory. Wiley.Google Scholar
Mett, R. R. & Tataronis, J. A. 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohkawa, T. 1989 Comments Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 12, 165.Google Scholar
Schelkunoff, S. A. & Friss, H. T. 1952 Antennas: Theory and Practice. Wiley.Google Scholar
Sheerin, J. P. & Ong, R. S. B. 1980 J. Plasma Phys. 24, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, H. R. 1976 Phys. Fluids 19, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M. Y. & Shukla, P. K. 1978 Phys. Fluids 21, 1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar