Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:49:56.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State-owned Enterprises Between Autonomy and Dependency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jean-Pierre Anastassopoulos
Jean-Pierre Anastassopoulos
Affiliation:
Business Policy, Centre Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Jouy-en-Josas, France
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between the state and its own enterprises may be analyzed at three different levels: a rational-economic level, where what is good for the state-owned enterprise may oppose what is good for the state as a whole; an organizational level, where such conflicts are aggravated by a power struggle; and a political level, where the arbitrating authority is seen as an individual member of the government. If state-owned enterprises are to serve national goals and be efficiently managed, their relationship with the state must be improved. First, the state should set the state-owned enterprise's general objectives, approve its proposed strategy, and refrain from intervening any further in its management. Second, the state-owned enterprise should report to one authority only for an approval, and submit to effective strategic control. Third, political interventions should be few, and should consist of middle-range agreements signed between a member of government and the state-owned industry's top manager, avoiding partisan or too detailed considerations.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1985, pp. 521 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

CITATIONS

Allison, G. T. (1971) Essence of Decision. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Anastassopoulos, J. P. (1977) L'Avenir d'une espece hybride: les enterprises publiques. Revue Francaise de Gestion, 7, 41–54.Google Scholar
Anastassopoulos, J. P. (1980) La Strategie des Entreprises Publiques. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Anastassopoulos, J. P. (1981) The French experience: Conflict with Government. In Vernon, R. and Aharom, Y., ed. State-owned Enterprises in Western Economies. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Anastassopoulos, J. P. and Dussauge, P. (1982) L'Armement: une specialite industrielle a la Francaise, Revue Francaise de Gestion 31, 57–64.Google Scholar
Anastassopoulos, J. P. and Stora, B. (1982) Pour de nouvelles relations entre l'état et les entreprises publiques. Revue Francaise de Gestion 7, 41–45.Google Scholar
Blanc, J. and Brule, C. (1983) Les Nationalisations Francaises en 1982. Paris: Documentation Francaise.Google Scholar
Chalandon, A. (1984) Denationaliser: Pourquoi? Le Monde, 11–12 July.Google Scholar
Chevallier, F. (1979) Les entreprises publiques en France. Paris: Documentation Francaise.Google Scholar
Dufau, J. (1973) Les entreprises publiques. Paris: Edition de l'Actualite Juridique.Google Scholar
Crozier, M. and Frydberg, E. (1977) L'Acteur et le Systeme. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. and March, J. (1970) Le Processus de Decision dans I'Entreprise. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Sfez, L. (1974) Critique de la Decision. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert (1945) Administrative Behavior. New York:Google Scholar