Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T03:19:16.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Existentially closed models via constructible sets: There are 2ℵ0 existentially closed pairwise non elementarily equivalent existentially closed ordered groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Anatole Khelif
Anatole Khelif*
Affiliation:
UFR de Mathématiques, Equipe de Logique, Université Paris VII, 2, Place Jussieu, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France, E-mail: khelif@logique.jussieu.fr
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove that there are 2χ0 pairwise non elementarily equivalent existentially closed ordered groups, which solve the main open problem in this area (cf. [3, 10]).

A simple direct proof is given of the weaker fact that the theory of ordered groups has no model companion; the case of the ordered division rings over a field k is also investigated.

Our main result uses constructible sets and can be put in an abstract general framework.

Comparison with the standard methods which use forcing (cf. [4]) is sketched.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 1996, pp. 277 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Belegradek, O. V., Elementary properties of algebraically closed groups, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 98 (1978).Google Scholar
[2]Glass, A. M. W. and Holland, W. C., Lattice-ordered groups, Mathematics and its applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1989.Google Scholar
[3]Glass, A. M. W. and Pierce, K. R., Existentially complete lattice ordered groups, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 36 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hirschfeld, J. and Wheeler, W. H., Forcing, arithmetic, division rings, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 454, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hodges, W., Model theory, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications, vol. 42, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
[6]Levy, A., Basic set theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[7]Macintyre, A. J., On algebraically closed groups, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 96 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Mura, R. B. and Rhemtulla, A., Orderable groups, Lectures in pure and applied mathematics, vol. 27, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
[9]Neumann, B. H., On ordered division rings, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 66 (1949), pp. 202–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Simonetta, P., Thése de doctorat: “décidabilité et interprétabilité dans les corps et les groupes non commutatifs”, Université Paris VII, 1994.Google Scholar
[11]Ziegler, M., Algebraisch abgeschlossene Gruppen, Word problems II (Adian, S. I., editor), Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1980.Google Scholar