Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:19:38.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A model with no magic set

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Krzysztof Ciesielski and
Saharon Shelah
Krzysztof Ciesielski
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6310, USA, E-mail: KCies@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Saharon Shelah
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA, E-mail: shelah@math.huji.ac.il
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We will prove that there exists a model of ZFC+“c =” in which every M ⊆ ℝ of cardinality less than continuum c is meager, and such that for every X ⊆ ℝ of cardinality c there exists a continuous function f : ℝ → ℝ with f[X] = [0, 1].

In particular in this model there is no magic set, i.e., a set M ⊆ ℝ such that the equation f[M] = g[M] implies f = g for every continuous nowhere constant functions f,g: ℝ → ℝ.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 1999, pp. 1467 - 1490
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[BaJu] Bartoszyński, T. and Judah, H., Set theory, A K Peters, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BaLa] Baumgartner, J. and Laver, R., Iterated perfect-set forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 17 (1979), pp. 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BeDi] Berarducci, A. and Dikranjan, D., Uniformly approachable functions and UA spaces, Rend. 1st. Matematica Univ. di Trieste, vol. 25 (1993), pp. 23–56.Google Scholar
[BuCi] Burke, M. R. and Ciesielski, K., Sets on which measurable functions are determined by their range, Canadian Mathematical Journal, vol. 49 (1997), pp. 1089–1116, (Preprint* available).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BuCi2] Burke, M. R. and Ciesielski, K., Sets of range uniqueness for classes of continuous functions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Preprint* available2), Posted on 05 11, 1999, PII:S0002-9939(99) 04905-9, to appear in print.Google Scholar
[Ci] Ciesielski, K., Set theory for the working mathematician, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 39, Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Co] Corazza, P., The generalized Borel conjecture and strongly proper orders, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 316 (1989), pp. 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ku] Kunen, K., Set theory, North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
[Mi] Miller, A. W., Mapping a set of reals onto the reals, this Journal, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 575–584.Google Scholar
[RoSh470] Rosłanowski, A. and Shelah, S., Norms on possibilities I: forcing with trees and creatures, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, in print.Google Scholar
[Sh] Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Lectures Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar