Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:25:30.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some forms of completeness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

P. C. Gilmore
P. C. Gilmore*
Affiliation:
Yorktown Heights, New York, U.S.A.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By a theory is meant an applied first-order predicate calculus with at least one predicate symbol and perhaps some individual constants and function symbols and a specified set of axioms. In addition to the terms defined by means of the individual variables, constants, and function symbols a theory may also include among its terms those constructed by means of operators such as the epsilon or iota operators; that is, expressions like (εχΡ) or (οχΡ), where P is a well formed formula (wff) of the theory, may also be terms. A constant term of a theory F is then a term in which no variable occurs free. We are interested only in theories which have at least one constant term so that if a theory doesn't have any individual constants it must necessarily admit as terms expressions constructed by means of operators. A sentence of a theory F is a closed wff.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 1962, pp. 344 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Gödel, Kurt, Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, vol. 38 (1931), pp. 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Henkin, Leon, The completeness of the first-order functional calculus, this Journal, vol. 14 (1949), pp. 159–166.Google Scholar
[3]Henkin, Leon, Completeness in the theory of types, this Journal, vol. 15 (1950), pp. 81–91.Google Scholar
[4]Henkin, Leon, A generalization of the concept of ω-consistency, this Journal, vol. 19 (1954), pp. 183–196.Google Scholar
[5]Henkin, Leon, A generalization of the concept of ω-completeness, this Journal, vol. 22 (1957), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
[6]Kleene, S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam (North-Holland), Groningen (Noordhoff), New York and Toronto (Van Nostrand), 1952.Google Scholar
[7]Robinson, Abraham, Complete theories, Amsterdam (North-Holland), 1956.Google Scholar