Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T11:51:49.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deduction Difficulties – ADDENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

Robert Howell
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Addendum
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2018, pp. 347
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415417000413. Published by Cambridge University Press, 23 February 2018.

In the following note on page 119, the author would like to include additional information regarding the citations to Dyck and Stephenson.

2 Schulting defends his views in the present volume, chapter 2. But I think the major criticisms by Dyck and Stephenson that he considers are correct.

The references to these citations are listed below:

Dyck, Corey W. (2014) ‘The Function of Derivation and the Derivation of Functions: A Review of Schulting’s Kant’s Deduction and Apperception’. Studi Kantiani, 27, 69-75.

Stephenson, Andrew (2014) ‘A Deduction from Apperception?’. Studi Kantiani, 27, 77-86.

References

Howell, Robert (2018) ‘Deduction Difficulties’. Kantian Review, 23, 111–121.Google Scholar

This correction applies to the following article(s):

Deduction Difficulties

Robert Howell