Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T21:56:03.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontology change: classification and survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

GIORGOS FLOURIS ,
DIMITRIS MANAKANATAS ,
HARIDIMOS KONDYLAKIS ,
DIMITRIS PLEXOUSAKIS  and
GRIGORIS ANTONIOU
GIORGOS FLOURIS
Affiliation:
Istituto della Scienza e delle Tecnologie della Informazione, C.N.R. Via Giuseppe Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy e-mail: flouris@@isti.cnr.it Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H. P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: fgeo@ics.forth.gr, manakan@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr, antoniou@ics.forth.gr
DIMITRIS MANAKANATAS
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H. P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: fgeo@ics.forth.gr, manakan@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr, antoniou@ics.forth.gr
HARIDIMOS KONDYLAKIS
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H. P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: fgeo@ics.forth.gr, manakan@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr, antoniou@ics.forth.gr Computer Science Department, University of Crete P.O. Box 2208, GR 71409, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: kondylak@csd.uoc.gr, dp@csd.uoc.gr, ga@csd.uoc.gr
DIMITRIS PLEXOUSAKIS
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H. P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: fgeo@ics.forth.gr, manakan@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr, antoniou@ics.forth.gr Computer Science Department, University of Crete P.O. Box 2208, GR 71409, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: kondylak@csd.uoc.gr, dp@csd.uoc.gr, ga@csd.uoc.gr
GRIGORIS ANTONIOU
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H. P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: fgeo@ics.forth.gr, manakan@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr, antoniou@ics.forth.gr Computer Science Department, University of Crete P.O. Box 2208, GR 71409, Heraklion, Greece e-mail: kondylak@csd.uoc.gr, dp@csd.uoc.gr, ga@csd.uoc.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Ontologies play a key role in the advent of the Semantic Web. An important problem when dealing with ontologies is the modification of an existing ontology in response to a certain need for change. This problem is a complex and multifaceted one, because it can take several different forms and includes several related subproblems, like heterogeneity resolution or keeping track of ontology versions. As a result, it is being addressed by several different, but closely related and often overlapping research disciplines. Unfortunately, the boundaries of each such discipline are not clear, as the same term is often used with different meanings in the relevant literature, creating a certain amount of confusion. The purpose of this paper is to identify the exact relationships between these research areas and to determine the boundaries of each field, by performing a broad review of the relevant literature.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 117 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

References

Alchourron, C., Gärdenfors, P. & Makinson, D. 1985 On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumueller, D., Do, H.H., Massmann, S. & Rahm, E. 2005 Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 906–908.Google Scholar
Avesani, P., Giunchiglia, F. & Yatskevich, M. 2005 A large scale taxonomy mapping evaluation. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 67–81.Google Scholar
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D. & Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.) 2002 The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baader, F., Horrocks, I. & Sattler, U. 2003 Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic web. In Hutter, D. & Stephan, W. (eds.) Festschrift in honor of Jörg Siekmann, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Banerjee, J., Kim, W., Kim, H. J. & Korth, H.F. 1987 Semantics and implementation of schema evolution in object- oriented databases. Proceedings of the 1987 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 311–322.Google Scholar
Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C. & Stevens, R. 2001 OilEd: A reasonable ontology editor for the semantic web. Proceedings of the 24th German/9th Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI-01), 396–408.Google Scholar
Bench-Capon, T. & Malcolm, G. 1999 Formalizing ontologies and their relations. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA-99), 250–259.Google Scholar
Benferhat, S., Kaci, S., Le Berre, D. & Williams, M. 2004 Weakening conflicting information for iterated revision and knowledge integration. Artificial Intelligence, 153, 339–371.Google Scholar
Ben-Miled, Z., Li, N. & Bukhres, O. 2005 BACIIS: Biological and chemical information integration systems. Journal of Database Management, 16(3), 73–85.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. & Lassila, O. 2001 The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34–43.Google Scholar
Bernstein, P.A., Melnik, S., Petropoulos, M. & Quix, C. 2004 Industrial-strength schema matching. SIGMOD Record, 33(4), 38–43.Google Scholar
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G. & Lenzerini, M. 2002 A Framework for ontology integration. In Cruz, I., Decker, S., Euzenat, J. & McGuinness, D. (eds.) The Emerging Semantic Web. Selected Papers from the First Semantic Web Working Symposium. Amsterdam: IOS Press,201–214.Google Scholar
Castano, S., Espinosa, S., Ferrara, A., Karkaletsis, V., Kaya, A., Melzer, S., Moller, R., Montanelli, S. & Petasis, G. 2007 Ontology dynamics with multimedia information: The BOEMIE evolution methodology. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), 41–54.Google Scholar
Castano, S., Ferrara, A. & Hess, G.N. 2006a Discovery-driven ontology evolution. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP-06).Google Scholar
Castano, S., Ferrara, A. & Montanelli, S. 2006b Matching ontologies in open networked systems: Techniques and applications. Journal on Data Semantics, 5, 25–63.Google Scholar
Chalupsky, H. 2000 OntoMorph: A translation system for symbolic knowledge. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-00), 471–482.Google Scholar
Choi, N., Il-Yeol, S. & Han, H. 2006 A survey on ontology mapping. ACM SIGMOD Record, 35(3),34–41.Google Scholar
David, J., Guillet, F., Gras, R. & Briand, H. 2006 Conceptual hierarchies matching: An approach based on discovery of implication rules between concepts. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-06), 357–361.Google Scholar
De Bruijn, J., Martin-Recuerda, F., Manov, D. & Ehrig, M. 2004 D4.2.1: State of the Art Survey on Ontology Merging and Aligning. Available on the Web (last visited November, 2007): www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/meh/publications/debruijn04state.pdf.Google Scholar
Dean, M., Schreiber, G., Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuiness, D., Patel-Schneider, P. & Stein, L.A. 2004 OWLWeb Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation. Available on the Web (last visited November, 2007): www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/Google Scholar
Do, H.H. & Rahm, E. 2002 COMA—A System for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB-02), 610–621.Google Scholar
Do, H.H., Rahm, E. & Melnik, S. 2002 Comparison of schema matching evaluations. Proceedings of the GIWorkshop of Web and Databases, 221–237.Google Scholar
Doan, A.H., Domingos, P. & Levy, A. 2000 Learning source descriptions for data integration. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Web and Databases (WebDB-00), 81–92.Google Scholar
Doan, A.H., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P. & Halevy, A. 2002 Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. Proceedings of the 11th International WWW Conference (WWW-02), 662–673.Google Scholar
Duineveld, A.J., Stoter, R.,Weiden, M.R., Kenepa, B. & Benjamins, V.R. 2000 WonderTools? A comparative study of ontological engineering tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(6), 1111–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrig, M., Staab, S. & Sure, Y. 2005 Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 186–200.Google Scholar
Euzenat, J., Le Bach, T., Barrasa, J., Bouquet, P., de Bo, J., Dieng, R., Ehrig, M., Hauswirth, M., Jarrar, M., Lara, R., Maynard, D., Napoli, A., Stamou, G., Stuckeschmidt, H., Shvaiko, P., Tessaris, S., van Acker, S. & Zaihrayeu, I. 2004 D2.2.3: State of the Art on Ontology Alignment. Available on the Web (last visitedNovember, 2007): www.starlab.vub.ac.be/research/projects/knowledgeweb/kweb-223.pdfGoogle Scholar
Euzenat, J. & Shvaiko, P. 2007 Ontology Matching. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ferrara, A. 2004 Methods and techniques for ontology matching and evolution in open distributed systems. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE-04), 71–82.Google Scholar
Flouris, G. 2006 On Belief Change and Ontology Evolution, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Crete, Greece.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Huang, Z., Pan, J., Plexousakis, D. & Wache, H. 2006a Inconsistencies, negations and changes in ontologies. Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), 1295–1300.Google Scholar
Flouris, G. & Plexousakis, D. 2005 Handling Ontology Change: Survey and Proposal for a Future Research Direction. Technical Report FORTH-ICS/TR-362.Google Scholar
Flouris, G. & Plexousakis, D. 2006 Bridging ontology evolution and belief change. Proceedings of the 4th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SETN-06), 486–489.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. 2004 Generalizing the AGM postulates: preliminary results and applications. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR-04), 171–179.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. 2005 On applying the agm theory to DLs and OWL. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 216–231.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. 2006b Evolving ontology evolution. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM-06), Invited Talk, 14–29.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. 2006c A Classification of ontology change. Poster Proceedings of the 3rd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP-06).Google Scholar
Foo, N. 1995 Ontology revision. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS- 95), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), vol 954, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 16–31.Google Scholar
Franconi, E., Grandi, F. & Mandreoli, F. 2000 A semantic approach for schema evolution and versioning in object-oriented databases. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Rules and Objects in Databases (DOOD-00), 1048–1062.Google Scholar
Friedrich, G. & Shchekotykhin, K. 2005 A general diagnosis method for ontologies. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 232–246.Google Scholar
Gabel, T., Sure, Y. & Voelker, J. 2004 D3.1.1.a: KAON—Ontology MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE. SEKT informal deliverable. Available on the Web (last visited November, 2007): www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/SEKT-D3.1.1.a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. 1992a Belief revision: An introduction. In Gärdenfors, P. (ed.) Belief Revision, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 1–20.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. 1992b The dynamics of belief systems: Foundations versus coherence theories. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 44, 24–46.Google Scholar
Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P. & Yatskevich, M. 2004 S-match: An algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, LNCS 3053, 61–75.Google Scholar
Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P. & Yatskevich, M. 2006 Discovering missing background knowledge in ontology matching. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-06), 382–386.Google Scholar
Goasdoui, F., Lattes, V. & Rousset, M.C. 2000 The use of CARIN language and algorithms for information integration: the PICSEL project. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 9 (4), 383–401.Google Scholar
Gruber, T.R. 1993a A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, T.R. 1993b Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Also available as Technical Report KSL-93–04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Guarino, N. 1998 Formal ontology and information systems. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems (FOIS-98). Amsterdam: IOS Press, 3–15.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, C., Hurtado, C. & Vaisman, A. 2006 The meaning of erasing in RDF under the Katsuno-Mendelzon approach. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB-06).Google Scholar
Haase, P. & Qi, G. 2007 An analysis of approaches to resolving inconsistencies in DL-based ontologies. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), 97–109.Google Scholar
Haase, P. & Stojanovic, L. 2005 Consistent evolution of OWL ontologies. Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-05), 182–197.Google Scholar
Haase, P. & Sure, Y. 2004 D3.1.1.b State of the art on ontology evolution. Available on the Web (last visited November, 2007): www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/SEKT-D3.1.1.b.pdfGoogle Scholar
Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H. & Sure, Y. 2005 A Framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC- 05), 353–367.Google Scholar
Halaschek-Wiener, C. & Katz, Y. 2006 Belief base revision for expressive description logics. Proceedings of OWL: Experiences and Directions 2006 (OWLED-06).Google Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 1994 Kernel contraction. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59(3), 845–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heflin, J. & Hendler, J. 2000 Dynamic ontologies on the Web. Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00), 443–449.Google Scholar
Heflin, J., Hendler, J. & Luke, S. 1999 Coping with changing ontologies in a distributed environment. Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Management of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99), WS-99–13, Berlin: AAAI Press, 74–79.Google Scholar
Heflin, J. & Pan, Z. 2004 A Model Theoretic Semantics for Ontology Versioning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-04), LNCS 3298 Springer, 62–76.Google Scholar
Hu, W. & Qu, Y. 2006 Block matching for ontologies. Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-06), 300–313.Google Scholar
Huang, Z. & Stuckenschmidt, H. 2005 Reasoning with multi-version ontologies: a temporal logic approach. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 398–412.Google Scholar
IBM Corporation Clio web page. Available on the Web (last visited November, 2007): www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/projects/criollo/Google Scholar
Kalfoglou, Y. & Schorlemmer, M. 2003 Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1),1–31.Google Scholar
Kalyanpur, A. 2006 Debugging and Repair of OWL Ontologies, Doctoral Dissertation University of Maryland, College Park, USA.Google Scholar
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E. & Cuenca-Grau, B. 2006 Repairing unsatisfiable concepts in OWL ontologies. Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-06), 170–184.Google Scholar
Kang, S.H. & Lau, S.K. 2004 Ontology revision using the concept of belief revision. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES-04), part III, 8–15.Google Scholar
Katsuno, H. & Mendelzon, A.O. 1990 On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. Technical Report on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, University of Toronto, Canada, KRR-TR-90–6.Google Scholar
Keberle, N., Litvinenko, Y., Gordeyev, Y. & Ermolayev, V. 2007 Ontology evolution analysis with OWL-MeT. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), 1–12.Google Scholar
Kim, W. & Chou, H.T. 1988 Versions of schema for object-oriented databases. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB-88), 148–159.Google Scholar
Klein, M. & Fensel, D. 2001 Ontology versioning on the Semantic Web. Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), 75–91.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A. & Ognyanov, D. 2002 Ontology versioning and change detection on the Web. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-02), 197–212.Google Scholar
Klein, M. & Noy, N. 2003 A component-based framework for ontology evolution. Proceedings of the IJCAI-03 Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems, CEUR-WS, vol. 71.Google Scholar
Kohler, J., Philippi, S. & Lange, M. 2003 SEMEDA: Ontology based semantic integration of biological databases. Bioinformatics, 19(18),2420–2427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondylakis, H. 2006 QUETE: Query Processing in Distributed Database Systems, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Crete, Greece.Google Scholar
Kondylakis, H., Doerr, M. & Plexousakis, D. 2006 Mapping Language for Information Integration. Technical Report FORTH-ICS/TR-385.Google Scholar
Konstantinidis, G., Flouris, G., Antoniou, G. & Christophides, V. 2007 Ontology evolution: A framework and its application to RDF. Proceedings of the Joint ODBIS & SWDB Workshop on Semantic Web, Ontologies, Databases (SWDB-ODBIS-07).Google Scholar
Lam, S.C., Pan, J., Sleeman, D. & Vasconcelos, W. 2006 A Fine-grained approach to resolving unsatisfiable ontologies. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-06), 428–434.Google Scholar
Lam, S.C., Sleeman, D. & Vasconselos, W. 2005 ReTAX++: A tool for browsing and revising ontologies. Poster Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), PID-33.Google Scholar
Lambrix, P. & Edberg, A. 2003 Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 589–600.Google Scholar
Lee, K. & Meyer, T. 2004 A classification of ontology modification. Proceedings of the 17th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI-04), 248–258.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Lutz, C., Milicic, M. & Wolter, F. 2006 Updating Description Logic ABoxes. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-06), 46–56.Google Scholar
Luke, S., Spector, L., Rager, D. & Hendler, J. 1997 Ontology-based Web agents. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 59–66.Google Scholar
Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Doan, A. & Halevy, A.Y. 2005 Corpus-based schema matching. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-05), 57–68.Google Scholar
Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A. & Rahm, E. 2001 Generic schema matching with cupid. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB-01), 49–58.Google Scholar
Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R. & Volz, R. 2003 An infrastructure for searching, reusing and evolving distributed ontologies. Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-03), 439–448.Google Scholar
Magiridou, M., Sahtouris, S., Christophides, V. & Koubarakis, M. 2005 RUL: A declarative update language for RDF. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 506–521.Google Scholar
Manakanatas, D. & Plexousakis, D. 2006 A tool for semi-automated semantic schema mapping: design and implementation. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Integration and the Semantic Web (DISWeb- 06), Proceedings of Workshops and Doctoral Consortium of the 18th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE-06), 290–306.Google Scholar
Maynard, D., Peters, W., dAquin, M. & Sabou, M. 2007 Change management for metadata evolution. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), 27–40.Google Scholar
McGuiness, D., Fikes, R., Rice, J. & Wilder, S. 2000 An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-00), also available as Technical Report KSL-00–16, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H. & Rahm, E. 2002 Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-02), 117–128.Google Scholar
Meyer, T., Lee, K. & Booth, R. 2005 Knowledge integration for description logics. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning and Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), 645–650.Google Scholar
Meyer, T., Lee, K., Booth, R. & Pan, J. 2006 Finding maximally satisfiable terminologies for the description logic ALC. Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), 269–274.Google Scholar
Miller, E., Swick, R. & Brickley, D. 2006 Resource Description Framework (RDF)/W3C Semantic Web Activity. Available on the Web (last visited November, 2007): www.w3.org/RDF/Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. 1995 WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM (CACM), 38(11), 39–41.Google Scholar
Mitra, P., Noy, N. & Jaiswal, A.R. 2005 OMEN: A probabilistic ontology mapping tool. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 537–547.Google Scholar
Mocan, A., Cimpian, E. & Kerrigan, M. 2006 Formal model for ontology mapping creation. Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-06), 459–472.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Chugh, A., Liu, W. & Musen, M. 2006 A framework for ontology evolution in collaborative environments. Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-06), 544–558.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Fergerson, R. & Musen, M. 2000 The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models, and Tools (EKAW-00), 17–32.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Klein, M. 2004 Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems, 6(4), 428–440, also available as SMI technical report SMI-2002–0926.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Kunnatur, S., Klein, M. & Musen, M. 2004 Tracking changes during ontology evolution. Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-04), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol 3298, 259–273, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Musen, M. 1999a An algorithm for merging and aligning ontologies: Automation and tool support. Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Management at 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99), also available as SMI technical report SMI-1999–0799.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Musen, M. 1999b SMART: Automated support for ontology merging and alignment. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, also available as SMI technical report SMI-1999–0813.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Musen, M. 2000 Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00), also available as SMI technical report SMI-2000–0831.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Musen, M. 2002 PromptDiff: A fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-02), also available as SMI Technical Report SMI-2002–0927.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Musen, M. 2003 The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 983–1024.Google Scholar
Noy, N. & Musen, M. 2004 Ontology Versioning in an ontology-management framework. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(4), 6–13, also available as SMI technical report SMI-2003–0961.Google Scholar
Palmisano, I., Iannone, L., Redavid, D. & Semeraro, G. 2006 Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP-06).Google Scholar
Pan, R., Ding, Z., Yu, Y. & Peng, Y. 2005 A Bayesian network approach to ontology mapping. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05),563–577.Google Scholar
Pérez-Rey, D., Maojo, V., García-Remesal, M., Alonso-Calvo, R., Billhardt, H., Martin-Sanchez, F. & Sousa, A. 2006 ONTOFUSION: Ontology-based integration of genomic and clinical databases. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 36(7–8), 712–730.Google Scholar
Peters, R.J. & Ozsu, T. 1997 An axiomatic model of dynamic schema evolution in objectbase systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 22(1),75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, H.S., Gomez-Perez, A. & Martins, J.P. 1999 Some issues on ontology integration. Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5) at 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99).Google Scholar
Plessers, P. & de Troyer, O. 2005 Ontology change detection using a version log. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 578–592.Google Scholar
Plessers, P. & de Troyer, O. 2006 Resolving inconsistencies in evolving ontologies. Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006), 200–214.Google Scholar
Plessers, P., de Troyer, O. & Casteleyn, S. 2005 Event-based modeling of evolution for semantic-driven systems. Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE-05), 63–76.Google Scholar
Qi, G., Liu, W. & Bell, D.A. 2006a A revision-based approach for handling inconsistency in description logics. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR-06).Google Scholar
Qi, G., Liu, W. & Bell, D.A. 2006b Knowledge base revision in description logics. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-06), 386–398.Google Scholar
Qi, G. & Pan, J. 2007 A Stratification-based approach for inconsistency handling in description logics. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), 83–96.Google Scholar
Rahm, E. & Bernstein, P.A. 2001 A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 10(4), 334–350.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M.M. & Wassermann, R. 2007 Base revision in description logics—preliminary results. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), 69–82.Google Scholar
Roger, M., Simonet, A. & Simonet, M. 2002 Toward updates in description logics. Proceedings of the 2002 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-02), CEUR-WS Vol. 53, also Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation Meets Databases (KRDB-02).Google Scholar
Schlobach, S. 2005 Diagnosing terminologies. Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06) 670–675.Google Scholar
Schlobach, S. & Cornet, R. 2003 Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), 355–360.Google Scholar
Shvaiko, P. & Euzenat, J. 2005 A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal of Data Semantics, 4, 146–171.Google Scholar
Shvaiko, P., Giunchiglia, F., Schorlemmer, M., McNeill, F., Bundy, A., Marchese, M., Yatskevich, M., Zaihrayeu, I., Ho, B., Lopez, V., Sabou, M., Abian, J., Siebes, R. & Kotoulas, S. 2006 Dynamic Ontology Matching: A Survey. Technical Report University of Trento/DIT-06–046.Google Scholar
Stevens, R., Baker, P., Bechhofer, S., Ng, G., Jacoby, A., Paton, N. W., Goble, C.A. & Brass, A. 2000 TAMBIS: Transparent access to multiple bioinformatics information sources. Bioinformatics, 16(2), 184–186.Google Scholar
Stoilos, G., Stamou, G. & Kollias, S. 2005 A string metric for ontology alignment. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 624–637.Google Scholar
Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Motik, B. & Stojanovic, N. 2002 User-driven ontology evolution management. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-02), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol 2473, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 285–300.Google Scholar
Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Stojanovic, N. & Studer, R. 2003 Ontology evolution as reconfiguration-design problem solving. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP-03), 162–171.Google Scholar
Stojanovic, L. & Motik, B. 2002 Ontology evolution within ontology editors. Proceedings of the OntoWeb-SIG3 Workshop, 53–62.Google Scholar
Stuckenschmidt, H. & Klein, M. 2003 Integrity and change in modular ontologies. Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03).Google Scholar
Stumme, G. & Maedche, A. 2002 Ontology merging for federated ontologies on the semantic web. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Foundations of Models for Information Integration, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sure, Y., Angele, J. & Staab, S. 2003 OntoEdit: multifaceted inferencing for ontology engineering. Journal on Data Semantics, 1(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svab, O., Svatek, V. & Stuckenschmidt, H. 2007 A study in empirical and ‘casuistic’ analysis of ontology mapping results. Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-07), 655–669.Google Scholar
Tansel, A.U., Clifford, J., Gadia, S.K., Jajodia, S., Segev, A. & Snodgrass, R.T. 1993 Temporal Databases: Theory, Design, and Implementation, Redwood, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.Google Scholar
Tzitzikas, Y. & Kotzinos, D. 2007 (Semantic Web) Evolution through change logs: Problems and solutions. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications (AIA-07), 610–675.Google Scholar
Völkel, M., Winkler, W., Sure, Y., Kruk, S.R. & Synak, M. 2005 SemVersion: A versioning system for rdf and ontologies. Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-05).Google Scholar
Wang, H., Horridge, M., Rector, A., Drummond, N. & Seidenberg, J. 2005 Debugging OWL-DL ontologies: A heuristic approach. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05).Google Scholar
Wassermann, R. 1998 Revising concepts. Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Logic, Language, Information and Communication (WoLLIC-98).Google Scholar
Wassermann, R. & Fermé, E. 1999 A Note on Prototype Revision. Spinning Ideas (Electronic Essays dedicated to Peter Gärdenfors on his 50th Birthday), also available as Research Report PP-1999–18 (ILLC Series).Google Scholar
Yatskevich, M. 2003 Preliminary Evaluation of Schema Matching Systems. Technical Report DIT-03–028.Google Scholar
Zeginis, D., Tzitzikas, Y. & Christophides, V. 2007 On the foundations of computing deltas between rdf models. Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-07).Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., Lin, C. X., Zhao, Y. & Yu, Y. 2003 Data migration for ontology evolution. Poster Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-03).Google Scholar
Zhdanova, V.A. & Shvaiko, P. 2006 Community-driven ontology matching. Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-06), 34–49.Google Scholar