Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:59:39.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards an argument interchange format

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2006

CARLOS CHESÑEVAR
Affiliation:
Universitat de Lleida, Catalunya, Spain; e-mail: cic@eps.udl.es Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina
MCGINNIS
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, UK
SANJAY MODGIL
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK, UK
IYAD RAHWAN
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, UK British University in Dubai, UAE
CHRIS REED
Affiliation:
University of Dundee, UK
GUILLERMO SIMARI
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina
MATTHEW SOUTH
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK, UK
GERARD VREESWIJK
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
STEVEN WILLMOTT
Affiliation:
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Catalunya, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics. However, one major barrier to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or ‘interchange format’ for argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we describe a draft specification for an argument interchange format (AIF) intended for representation and exchange of data between various argumentation tools and agent-based applications. It represents a consensus ‘abstract model’ established by researchers across fields of argumentation, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. In its current form, this specification is intended as a starting point for further discussion and elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is briefly described. Moreover, three concrete realizations or ‘reifications’ of the abstract model are illustrated.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press