Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T10:51:36.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Independent cross-cultural data reveal linguistic effects on basic numerical cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Caleb Everett
Caleb Everett*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Miami, USA. E-mail: caleb@miami.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The role of numeric language in basic numerical cognition is explored via the consideration of results obtained in two recent independent studies, one with Nicaraguan homesigners and one with speakers of Pirahã. Attention is drawn to remarkable parallels between the relevant findings, parallels that provide compelling evidence that adults without access to numeric language face difficulties when simply attempting to differentiate quantities greater than three.

Keywords

number wordsnumerical cognitionlinguistic relativity

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2013, pp. 99 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2013

References

Casasanto, D. 2005. Crying “Whorf”. Science 307. 1721–1722.Google Scholar
Condry, K. & Spelke, E.. 2008. The development of language and abstract concepts: The case of natural number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137. 22–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R. & Tsivkin, S.. 1999. Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science 284. 970–974.Google Scholar
Everett, C. & Madora, K.. 2012. Quantity recognition among speakers of an anumeric language. Cognitive Science 36. 130–141.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46. 621–646.Google Scholar
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S. & Spelke, E.. 2004. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8. 307–314.Google Scholar
Frank, M., Everett, D., Fedorenko, E. & Gibson, E.. 2008. Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition 108. 819–824.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. 2004. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306. 496–499.Google Scholar
Hammarström, H. 2010. Rarities in numeral systems. In Wohlgemuth, J. & Cysouw, M. (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, 11–60. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V. & Dehaene, S.. 2004. Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 306. 499–503.Google Scholar
Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E., Carey, S. & Goldin-Meadow, S.. 2011. Number without a language model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108. 3163–3168.Google Scholar