Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T20:37:20.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hypercorrection and grammar change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Carol W. Pfaff
Carol W. Pfaff
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pfaff (1973, 1975) reports on 81 low- and middle-income first-grade Black children who produced multiple instances of linguistic variables by answering questions about a set of pictures and telling the story of Goldilocks and the three bears. No models were given of the linguistic variables under investigation, which included a number of third person singular present-tense verb forms: -s inflection of regular verbs, auxiliary and main verb be, auxiliary and main verb have, auxiliary do and possessive marking on nouns. Standard marking of all of these linguistic variables has been shown by previous studies of free conversation to be variably lacking in Black English (Labov, Cohen, Robins & Lewis 1968; Fasold 1972).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1976, pp. 105 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C.-J. (1972). The patterning of language variation. In Bailey, R. W. & Robinson, J. L. (eds.), Varieties of present-day American English. New York: Macmillan. 156–86.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7. 457–92.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973). Quantitative versus dynamic paradigms. In Bailey, C.-J. & Shuy, R. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Geogetown University Press. 23–43.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50. 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, R. (1972). Tense marking in Black English. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45. 715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Cooperative Research Project No. 3288. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. (1973) A sociolinguistic study of Black children in Los Angeles. Unpublished U.C.L.A. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. (1975). The process of decreolization in Black English. Paper presented at the International Conference on Pidgins and Creoles, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar