Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T00:31:43.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A stylistic analysis of speaking1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Alan Lomax
Alan Lomax
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stylistic analysis takes account of the dynamic continuities in communication behavior. It is concerned with how people talk or sing or move in relation to each other, rather than what it is they say or sing or do to or with each other. The presence of these styling qualities can, we discover, be reliably assessed; and, as they cluster together, giving each cultural tradition its distinctive performance models, they have remarkable stability through time. However, these patterns of style are not inflexible: they are models comprising a stable set of ranges within which performers can adjust their behavior to the demands of a genre, of a familiar situation, of sex, age or status roles, and to the unexpected. The comparison of these performance models, cross-culturally, reveals factors that tie communication to social structure on the one hand and to cultural traditions on the other.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1977, pp. 15 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Chapple, E. D. & Arensberg, C. M. (1940). Measuring human relations Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 22.Google Scholar
Kulig, , Carol, (1974). On some American speech patterns. An experiment in sociolinguistics. Unpublished thesis.Google Scholar
Lomax, A. et al. (1968). Folk song style and culture (American Association for the Advancement of Science, publication 88), Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lomax, A. (1970). The homogeneity of African–Afro-American musical style. In Whitten, N. E. Jr, and Szwed, J. F. (eds), Afro-American anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lomax, A. & Berkowitz, N. (1972). An evolutionary taxonomy of culture: A few behavioral factors account for the regional variation and evolutionary development of culture. Science 177. 228–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomax, A. (1973). Cross cultural factors in phonological change. LinS 2. 161–75.Google Scholar
Lomax, A. et al. (1977). Cantometrics, A Training Method, (submitted for publication). The 7 training tapes available E.M.C., U. of C., Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
Markel, N. (1965). The reliability of coding paralanguage: Pitch loudness, and tempo. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4 (4). 306–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markel, N. (1969). The relationship between voice quality profiles and MMPI profiles in psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74. 61–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQuown, N. A. (1957). Linguistic transcription and specification of psychiatric interview material. Psychiatry 20. 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1961). World Ethnographic Sample. Readings in Cross-Cultural Methodology, Moore, Frank, ed., HRAF Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Trager, G. (1958). Paralanguage: A first approximation. Studies in Linguistics 13. 1–12.Google Scholar