Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:32:42.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telephone goodbyes1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Herbert H. Clark  and
J. Wade French
Herbert H. Clark
Affiliation:
Stanford University
J. Wade French
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In urban American telephone conversations, we propose, the final exchange of goodbyes doesn't terminate the conversation per se but brings to completion a process of leave-taking in which the two parties reaffirm their acquaintance before breaking contact. This process is optional, so that if the two parties are not acquainted, they should omit the process and not exchange goodbyes. We tested this proposal by examining goodbyes offered to operators in routine inquiries to a university switchboard. In requests for a single number, callers offered goodbye only 39 percent of the time. This percentage increased, however, (1) when callers asked for more personally revealing information, (2) when callers felt more appreciation for the information they received, as indicated by their use of thank you very much instead of thank you, and (3) when operators revealed more about themselves by making and then correcting their own mistakes. These and other findings suggest that the more closely acquainted the caller and operator feel they have become, the more likely the caller is to want to reaffirm acquaintance and say goodbye.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1981 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Albert, S., & Kessler, S. (1976). Processes for ending social encounters: The conceptual archeology of a temporal place. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 6: 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, S., & Kessler, S. (1978). Ending social encounters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14: 541–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M., & de Haan, D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men: On the wrong track? Language in Society 8: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in Society 6: 313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in society 5: 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. B., & Greif, E. B. (1980). Hi, thanks, and goodbye: More routine information. Language in Society 9: 159–66.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B., & Greif, E. B. & Weintraub, S. (1976). The acquisition of routines in child language. Language in Society 5: 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, D. (1977). Same setting, different norms: Phone call beginnings in France and the United States. Language in Society 6: 209–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin 86: 616–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnographv of conununication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1974). Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. In Bauman, R. and Scherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 167–91.Google Scholar
Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., Friedrich, G. W., & Schulman, G. M. (1973). The rhetoric of goodbye: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of human leave taking. Speech Monographs 40: 182–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2: 45–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1973). Statistical methods (7th ed). Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar