Alexander, L.G. (1979). A functional/notional approach to course design. AVLJ, 17, 2, 109–14.Google Scholar

Anon. (1978). Report from the York Area Working Party on language proficiency tests. ML, 59, 3, 150–2.Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, R. (1980). An exercise in DIY. The Clwyd course in French. TES, 8.2.80.Google Scholar

Bergentoft, R. (1980). Intensive visit organised by the British authorities within the framework of the interaction network in the schools sector of the Modern Languages Project (document CC-GP4) 80 (16). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Biggs, B. C. (1980). A graded system of examinations in modern languages. The teaching of modern languages: a view for the 1980s. Headmasters' Conference Report 2, 39–41.Google Scholar

Bird, E. (1982). Graded objectives, where now? The Teaching of Modern Languages, Perspectives 10, 61–77. Exeter: School of Education, University of Exeter.Google Scholar

Blight, M. (1982). The place of grammar. In Hodgson, G. A. (ed), 37–8.Google Scholar

Bolton, D. R. (1980). York area graded language proficiency tests. MLS, 19, 88–97.Google Scholar

Brown, E. (1982). Goethe Institute GOML Workshop: Report of the Third Workshop on Graded Objectives, Testing and examinations at secondary level. GOML Newsletter 7, 7–8.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1973). A syllabus for modern languages at 16+. AVLJ, 11, 1, p. 62.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1976). Language deprivation. TES, 29.10.76.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1977). Modular approach. TES, 15.4.77.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1978). Report from the York Area Working Party on language proficiency tests. ML, 59, 3,150–3.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1980 a). A graded system of syllabuses and examinations. MLS, 20, 75–81.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1980 b). Action! London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Buckby, M., Bull, P., Fletcher, R., Green, P., Page, B. & Roger, D. (1981 a). Graded objectives and tests for modern languages: an evaluation. London: Schools Council.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1981 b). Graded objectives and tests for modern languages: an evaluation. BJLT, 19, 1, 13–14.Google Scholar

Buckby, M. (1981 c). Better to have had and lost. TES, 6.2.81.Google Scholar

Byram, M. S. (1978). ‘New objectives’ in language teaching.ML, 59, 4, p. 205.Google Scholar

Byram, M. S. (1979). Performance objectives and language learning. ML, 40, 2, 111–15.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. A. (1980). Objectives testing in modern languages. MLS, 20, 100–12.Google Scholar

Chapman, D. (1980). Graded levels of achievement in foreign-language learning. MLS, 19, 62–75.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1977). Certification – sway forward? MLS, 13, 89–93.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1978). Lothian region's levels of achievement scheme. MLS, 15, 158–60.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1979 a). The syllabus. What should the learner learn? AVLJ, 17, 2, 99–108.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1979 b). Syllabus design for graded levels of achievement in foreign-language learning. MLS, 18, 25–39.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1980 a). Lothian region's project on graded levels of achievement in foreign-language learning: from principles to practice. MLS, 19, 61–74.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1980 b). Communication in the classroom. MLS, 21/22, 144–56.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1981). Some caveats about current curriculum development in modern languages involving the objectives model, defined syllabuses and criterion referenced assessment. NALA (Journal of the National Association of Language Advisers), 12, 6–8.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1982). Syllabus design for foreign-language learning at various levels. In Hodgson, G. A. (ed.), 16–28.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. (1979). Graded tests in schools. AVLJ, 17, 2, 123–4.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. (ed.) (1980). Graded French tests. London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Cockroft, W. (1983). Interview with editor. Schools Council News, 42, 6–7.Google Scholar

Coste, D., Courtillon, J.Ferenczi, V., Martins-Baltar, M. & Papo, E. (1976). Un niveau-seuil. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Cross, D. (1979). Motivating the majority. AVLJ, 17, 2, 83–6.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. M. C. (1973). A common system of examination at 16+: some reactions to the Schools Council Bulletin No. 23. ML, 54, 1, 14–22.Google Scholar

Department of Education and Science (1983 a). A survey of the use of graded tests of defined objectives and their effect on the teaching and learning of modern languages in the county of Oxfordshire.Google Scholar

Department of Eduction and Science (1983b). Foreign languages in the school curriculum.Google Scholar

Downes, P. J. (1978). Graded examinations for elementary language learners: the Oxfordshire project. ML, 59, 3, 153–6.Google Scholar

Downes, P. J. (1980). Graded examinations for elementary language learners: the Oxfordshire project, The teaching of modern languages: a view for the 1980s. Headmasters' Conference Report 2, 36- 9.Google Scholar

Dunning, R. (forthcoming). The East Midlands graded assessment feasibility study. Paper given at the Annual Meeting, BAAL, 1982.Google Scholar

Ellis, D. (1978). Modern languages credit system. NALA (Journal of the National Association of Language Advisers).Google Scholar

Friedman, E. S. (1981). EMREB CSE Research Project: third annual report. School of Education, University of Leicester.Google Scholar

Friedman, E. S. (forthcoming). Evaluation of the East Midlands graded assessment feasibility study. Paper given at the Annual Meeting, BAAL, 1982.Google Scholar

Friedman, E. S. (1982). Evaluation of the East Midlands graded assessment feasibility study for the year 1979–80. School of Education, University of Leicester.Google Scholar

Friedman, E. S. (1983). Evaluation of the graded assessment feasiblity study. In EMREB CSE Research Project: 4th Annual Report, 3–6.Google Scholar

Garner, E. (1981 a). Going for G.O.A.L.S. TES, 6.2.81.Google Scholar

Garner, E. (1981 b). Background studies and graded examinations. NALA (Journal of the National Association of Language Advisers), 12, 9–10.Google Scholar

Garside, T. (1982). What graded objectives has meant to us. GOML Newsletter No. 6, 9–11.Google Scholar

Gia, A. C. (1982). The GLAFFL project. ATI Journal (Association of Teachers of Italian), 35, 63–7.Google Scholar

GOML Committee (1982). The GOML Committee's response to the 16+ national criteria. GOML Newsletter No. 6.Google Scholar

Gordon, K. L. (1977). The first formal account. TES, 4.11.77.Google Scholar

Gordon, K. L. (1980). Oxfordshire Modern Languages Achievement Certificate. MLS, 19, 99–114.Google Scholar

Grundy, J. (1983). Teaching for OMLAC across the ability range. OMLAC News Sheet No. 1. Oxfordshire Education Authority.Google Scholar

Harding, A. & Page, B. (1974). An alternative model for modern language examinations. AVLJ, 12, 3, 237–41.Google Scholar

Harding, A. (1978). La gradation des objectifs d'apprentissage des langues vivantes dans le Royaume-Uni. In Coste, D. (ed.), Contributions à une renovation de l'apprentissage et de l'enseignement des langues (1982). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Harding, A. & Naylor, J. A. (1979). Graded objectives in second-language learning: a way ahead. AVLJ, 17, 3, 169–74.Google Scholar

Harding, A., Page, B. & Rowell, S. (1980). Graded objectives in modern languages. London: CILT.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. (1982). Schools Council Examinations Bulletin 41: review of graded tests. Methuen Educational.Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. A. (ed.) (1982). Tongues, 26, Special issue: Graded Objectives. Curriculum Directorate, Education Department of South Australia.Google Scholar

House of Commons. Report of the Education, Science and Arts Committee, Session 1981–1982. The secondary school curriculum and examinations, 1, lvi.Google Scholar

ILEA (1980). Éclair. Mary Glasgow Publications.Google Scholar

ILEA (1980 onwards). Éclair. Graded Tests Levels 1–3. Mary Glasgow Publications.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. (1980). ILEA Graded Tests Working Party, a progress report. MLS, 19, 115–21.Google Scholar

Lees, N. (1983). Observing classroom procedures and standardising assessment in the graded assessment of French. EMREB CSE Research Project: 4th Annual Report, 22–7.Google Scholar

Lees, N. (forthcoming). Aspects of standardisation within a communicative assessment syllabus. Paper given at the Annual Meeting, BAAL, 1982.Google Scholar

McGhee, B. (1982). Graded objectives (EMREB) NALA (Journal of the National Association of Language Advisers), 13, 30–1.Google Scholar

McLean, D. (1982). The implementation of graded objectives syllabus in teaching modern languages. In Hodgson, G. A. (ed), 29–33.Google Scholar

McLeod, S. (1982). What's happening in the North West (Cumbria–Lancashire)? GOML Newsletter No.6, 11–13.Google Scholar

Modern Language Association (1981). Submission by the MLA to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Education, Science and the Arts in connection with an enquiry into the secondary school curriculum and examinations: 02 1981. ML, 52, 2, 102–9.Google Scholar

Modern Languages Curriculum Committee (1982 a). The development of graded objectives. In Hodgson, G. A. (ed.), 1–2.Google Scholar

Modern Languages Curriculum Committee (1982 b). An introduction to the graded objectives approach to language teaching. In Hodgson, G. A. (ed.), 3–15.Google Scholar

Morrow, K. (1977). Techniques of evaluation for a notional syllabus. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar

Neumann, R. (1982). The use of graded objectives in German in the classroom. In Hodgson, G. A. (ed), 34–6.Google Scholar

OMLAC (1977). New objectives in modern language teaching. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

OMLAC (1981). New objectives in modern language teaching, Book 2. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

Otter, H. S. (1968). A functional language examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1973). Another look at examinations. AVLJ, 11, 2, 127–30.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1974). An alternative to 16+. ML, 55, 1–5.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1975). Shorter courses and more motivation needed. TES, 31.10.75.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1978). Graded examinations. ML, 59, 2, 97–101.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1979). Notions, functions and threshold levels: a review of the significance for language teachers of the work of the Council of Europe. AVLJ, 17, 2, 115–22.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1981 a). Graded objectives in modern language teaching and learning in the United Kingdom. Aspects of Education (Journal of the Institute of Education. The University of Hull), 25, 27–34.Google Scholar

Special issue (ed. Richardson, G.), Modern language teaching in the 1980s.Google Scholar

Page, B. (1981 b). Graded objectives. In Design, Evaluation and Testing in English Language Projects, Dunford House Seminar 1981. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Page, B. (forthcoming, a). Defined syllabuses: crutch or straitjacket? Paper given at the Annual Meeting, BAAL, 1982.Google Scholar

Page, B. (forthcoming, b). Development of graded objectives systems in modern language learning in the United Kingdom. NIMLA (Journal of the Modern Languages Association of Northern Ireland).Google Scholar

Paul, R. H. (1981). Needed: stepladders of foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 14, 5.Google Scholar

Peck, A. (1980). The York Schools German Achievement Test. Treffpunkt, 12, 1, 17–21.Google Scholar

Porcher, L., Huart, M. & Mariet, F. (1979). Adaptation de ‘Un niveau-seuil’ pour des contextes scolaires. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Richterich, R. & Chancerel, , Jean-Louis, (1977). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Reprinted by Pergamon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Rowell, S. (1980). Oral testing: report of a meeting with reports of contributions from ILEA (J. Farrell), OMLAC (P. Dickson), Lothian (J. Hamilton), East Midlands (R. Dunning), Archbishop Michael Ramsey School (David), Yorkshire Regional Examinations Board (Brian Park). Further reports from the Working Parties on the content, conduct, marking of oral tests. GOML Newsletter No. 3.Google Scholar

Rowell, S. (ed.) (1981 a). Report of a meeting to discuss possible common elements in a Level 4 (CSE Mode 3) examination. GOML Newsletter No. 4.Google Scholar

Rowell, S. (ed.) (1981 b). Grading GOML Levels 3, 4, 5 and 6. Reports of Working Parties. GOML Newsletter No. 5.Google Scholar

Rowell, S. (1982). The communicative classroom: report of working meeting. GOML Newsletter No. 7.Google Scholar

Sheils, J. (1982). Graded objectives. Teangeolas, 14.Google Scholar

Tracy, C. (1982). Graded objectives in modern languages: a personal view. NIMLA (Journal of the Modern Languages Association of Northern Ireland), 9, 25–32.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M., Richterich, R., Van, Ek J. A. & Wilkins, D. A. (1973). Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Reprinted by Pergamon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M. (1977). A European unit credit system. MLS, 14, 39–44.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M. (1978). Developing a unit/credit scheme of adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Reprinted by Pergamon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M. (1979). Explicit objectives. TES, 16.11.79.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M. (1980). Council of Europe: Council for Cultural Cooperation Project No. 4: Modern Languages. MLS, 19, 51–4.Google Scholar

Utley, D., Mitchell, R. & Phillips, J. A. N. (forthcoming). Graded objectives in modern languages: oral/aural investigation. London: Schools Council.Google Scholar

Van, Ek J. A. (1975). Threshold Level English. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Reprinted by Pergamon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Van, Ek J. A. (1976). The Threshold Level for modern language learning in schools. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Van, Ek J. A., Alexander, L. & Fitzpatrick, M. (1977). Waystage English. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Reprinted by Pergamon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Van, Ek J. A. (1977). The Threshold Level, MLS, 14, 44–50.Google Scholar

Watts, N. & Brooker, G.A defined language syllabus within a communicative approach: reflections on the new French and German syllabuses. New Zealand Language Teacher, 7, 3.Google Scholar

Whalley, M. & Whiteside, S. (1980). Graded tests in French and German. Essex Education, 34, 2, 37–8.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. (1982). Graded levels of achievement – millenarianism revisited? What can we do while we wait? In Hodgson, G. A. (ed), 39–42.Google Scholar

Wood, N. (1982). Graded tests for London. TES, 5.11.82.Google Scholar