Alderson, J.C. (1991). Bands and scores. In Alderson, J. C. & North, B. (eds.), Language testing in the 1990s. London: Modern English Publications/British Council, Macmillan, 71–86.Google Scholar

Alderson, J.C. & Urquhart, S. (1984). Reading in a foreign language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Allen, P., Cummins, J., Mougeon, R. & Swain, M. (1983). The development of bilingual proficiency: interim report on the first year of research. Toronto: Modem Language Centre; OISE.Google Scholar

Andersen, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 4, 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1984). Some comments on the terminology of language testing. In Rivera, C. (ed.),. Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: research and application. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 34–43.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Berwick, R. & Ross, S. (1993). Cross-cultural pragmatics in oral proficiency interview strategies. Paper presented at the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Cambridge and Arnhem, 2–4 August 1993.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Interlanguage is not a state of mind: an evaluation of the construct for second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 6, 2, 101–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breen, M. & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 2, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brindley, G. (1989). Assessing achievement in the learner centred curriculum. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.Google Scholar

Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shilock, R. & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: the roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. (1987). Concepts and categories in language teaching methodology. AILA Review, 4, 25–31.Google Scholar

Burton, D. (1980). Dialogue and discourse: a sociolinguistic approach to modern drama dialogue and naturally occurring conversation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Byram, M. & Zarate, G. (1994). Definitions, objectives and evaluation of socio-cultural competence. Strasbourg: Council of Europe CC-LANG (94) 1.Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1983). A communicative competence approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting. In Rivera, C. (ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: research and application. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 107–22.Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1984). On some theoretical frameworks for language proficiency. In Rivera, C. (ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 28–40.Google Scholar

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1981). A Theoretical framework for communicative competence. In Palmer, A., Groot, P. and Trosper, G. (eds.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington DC.: TESOL, 31–6.Google Scholar

Carrell, P. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge. Paper presented at 1983 TESOL Convention (Toronto, Ont., March 1983). Reprinted in Reading in a Foreign Language, 2, 81–91.Google Scholar

Carrell, P. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 3, 461–81.Google Scholar

Carroll, J.B. (1983). Psychometric theory and language testing. In Oiler, (1983): 80–107.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, cited in e.g. Taylor 1988, Widdowson 1989.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell, cited in e.g. Taylor 1988, Widdowson 1989.Google Scholar

Clark, J.L. (1987). Curriculum renewal in school foreign language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive academic language proficiency: linguistic interdependence, the optimum ages question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19. Toronto, 197–205.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1980). The Cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 3, 175–87.Google Scholar

Czisko, G. (1984). Some problems with empirically-based models of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics 5, 1, 23–38.Google Scholar

Davies, A. (1989). Communicative competence as language use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 2, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dekeyser, R. M. (1988). Communicative processes and strategies. Annual Revieiv of Applied Linguistics 9, 108–21.Google Scholar

Elder, C. (1993). How do subject specialists construe classroom language proficiency? Language Testing, 10, 3, 235–54.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Færch, C. (1984). Strategies in production and reception – the empirical evidence. In Davies, A., Criper, C. & Mowat, A.P.R., Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 49–78.Google Scholar

Færch, C. & Kasper, G. K. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Færch, C. & Kasper, G.K. (eds.), 20–60.Google Scholar

Færch, C. & Kasper, G.K. (eds.) (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 1, 43–59.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. (1979). On fluency. In Fillmore, C.. Kempler, D. & Wang, W. (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behaviour. New York: Academic Press, 85–101.Google Scholar

Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1994). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning, Paper presented at the British Association of Applied Linguistics, Leeds 1994.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday, cited in McNamara 1995.Google Scholar

Grice, H. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 67. Reprinted in Steinberg, D. & Jakobits, L. (1971) Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–9; cited in Levinson 1983.Google Scholar

Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J., Syntax and semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J.J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, J.J. (1984). Communicative competence revisited. Berkeley Science Report Series, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. & Swain, M. (1990). The development of second language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hymes, D. (1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In Huxley, R. and Ingrams, E., (eds.), Language acquisition, models and methods. New York: Academic Press, 3–28.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J.B. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–93.Google Scholar

Kellerman, E., Bongearts, T. & Poulisse, N. (1987). Strategy and system in L2 referential communication. In Ellis, R., Second language acquisition in context, Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 100–12.Google Scholar

Kennedy, B.L. (1988). Adult versus child acquisition: an information-processing approach. Language Learning, 38, 4, 477—95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70, 4, 366–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, R. (1993). International education and international competency in the United States. In Moore, S.J. & Morfit, C.A., (eds), Language and international studies: a Richard Lambert perspective. Washington D.C.: National Foreign Language Center Monograph Series: 189–205.Google Scholar

Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman, cited by Thomas 1983.Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning; 40, 3, 387–417.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T & McLeod, B (1983). Second language learning: an information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 2, 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, T. (1990). Assessing the language proficiency of health professionals. Unpublished PhD cited by Elder 1993.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. (1995). Modelling performance: opening Pandora's box. Applied Linguistics, 16, 2, 159–79.Google Scholar

Munby, J. 1978. Communicative syllabus design: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1991). Performance appraisal: an organisational perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

North, B. (1992). A European language portfolio: some options for a working approach to design scales of proficiency. In Council of Europe 1992 Transparency and coherence in language learning in Europe: objectives, assessment and certification – the proceedings of the Intergovernmental Symposium held at Rüschlikon November 1991 (ed. North, B.) Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 158–74. Reprinted in Schärer, R. & North, B., Towards a common European framework for reporting language competency, NFLC Occasional Paper. Washington D.C.: National Foreign Language Center, April 1992.Google Scholar

North, B. (1994). Scales of language proficiency: a survey of some existing systems. Strasbourg: Council of Europe CC-LANG (94)24.Google Scholar

Oksaar, E. (1992). Intercultural communication in multicultural settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2, 1, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oller, J.W. (1983) Issues in language testing research. Rowley Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Parks, M.R. (1985). Interpersonal competence and the quest for personal competence. In Knapp, M.L. and Miller, G.L., Handbook of interpersonal communication, Beverley Hills, Calif. Sage, 171–201.Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1992). Assessing second language acquisition through rapid profile. LARC Occasional Paper No 3. Feb 1992. Sydney: Language Acquisition Research Centre.Google Scholar

Sang, F., Schmitz, B., Vollmer, H.J., Baumert, J. & Roeder, P.M. (1986). Models of second language competence, a structural equation approach. Language Testing, 3, 1, 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savignon, S.J. (1972). Communicative competence. An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development, cited in e.g. Savignon 1983, Taylor 1988.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In Laver, and Hutchinson, (eds.), Communication in face to face interaction, Penguin Modern Linguistics Readings, 374–405.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and acquisition of communicative competence, in Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition, 137–74.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 129–58.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–85.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209–31.Google Scholar

Shaw, P. (1992). Variation and universality in communicative competence: Coseriu's Model. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 1, 9–25.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. McH. (1981). Planes of discourse. Unpublished manuscript, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar

Reprinted 1983 in Rizvil, S.N.A.. (ed.), The two-fold voice: essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan. Salzburg: Salzburg Studies in English Literature, University of Salzburg.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 2, 188—221.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1995a). Analysability, accessibility and ability for use. In Cook, G. & Seidlehofer, S. (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1995b). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 4, 542–66.Google Scholar

Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Swales, J.M. (1990). The genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (1983/1981). Some thoughts on the notion of ‘communication strategy’. In Faerch, and Kasper, 1983: 63–8 (originally published in TESOL Quarterly Sep 1981).Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability in interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 2, 142–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, D. (1988). The meaning and use of the term ‘competence’ in linguistics and applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 9, 2, 148–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 1,91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Upshur, J.A. & Homberg, T.J. (1983). Some relations among language tests at successive ability levels in Oiler (ed.) 1983, 188–202.Google Scholar

Van Ek, J.A. (1986). Objectives for foreign language teaching, Volume I: Scope. Strasbourg, Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Van Ek, J.A. & Trim, J.L.M. (1990). Threshold Level 1990. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (1989). Reeling, writhing, fainting and stretching in coils: oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 3, 489–508.Google Scholar

Ventola, E. (1979). The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 267–98.Google Scholar

Ventola, E. (1983). Contrasting schematic structures in service encounters. Applied Linguistics, 4, 3, 242–58.Google Scholar

Vollmer, H.J. (1981). Why are we interested in ‘general language proficiency’?. In Alderson, J.C. & Hughes, A. (eds.), Issues in language testing. ELT Doc 111. London: British Council, 152–76.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H.G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H.G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 2, 128–37.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H.G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiemann, J.M. & Backlund, P. (1980). Current theory and research in communicative competence. Review of Educational Research 50, 1, 185–99.Google Scholar