Anderson, J. (1969). A note on ‘rank’ and ‘delicacy’. Journal of Linguistics, 5, 1, 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control, Vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Berry, M. (1975). An introduction to systemic linguistics, Vol. 1: Structures and systems. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Berry, M. (1977). An introduction to systemic linguistics, Vol. 2: Levels and links. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Butler, C. S. (in preparation). The directive function of the English modals. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar

Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Discourse analysis in English – a short review of the literature. Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 8, 2, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Rabbat, A. H. (1978). The major clause types of Egyptial Colloquial Arabic – a participant-process approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1973 a). Systemic functional grammar in a cognitive model of language. University College London, mimeo. (Available through ETIC Archives.)Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1973 b). Generating a sentence in systemic functional grammar. University College London, mimeo. (Available through ETIC Archives.) Revised version to appear in Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (eds.), Readings in systemic linguistics 1956–1974.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1974). Some proposals for systemic syntax: Part 1. MALS Journal, 1, 2, 1–15.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1975 a). Summary of ‘Some issues concerning levels in systemic models of language’ (paper read to Nottingham Linguistic Circle, Dec. 1973). Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 4, 1, 24–37.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1975 b). Some proposals for systemic syntax: Part 2. MALS Journal, 2, 1, 43–68.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1975 c). System networks, codes, and knowledge of the universe: a cognitive perspective on the relationship between language and culture. Paper presented to Burg Wartenstein Symposium No. 66. Semiotics of Culture and Language. Revised version to appear in Halliday, M. A. K., Lamband, S. M. and Makkai, A. (eds.), The semiotics of culture and language. SUNY, Buffalo: The Press at Twin Willows.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1976 a). Some proposals for systemic syntax: Part 3. MALS Journal, 2, 2, 35–68.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1976 b). A selected systemic bibliography. Available through ETIC Archives.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (1978). How many functional components in a systemic functional grammar? Paper read to the meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain. Sheffield, 09 1978.Google Scholar

Fawcett, R. P. (forthcoming). Cognitive linguistics and social interaction: towards an integrated model of a systemic functipnal grammar and the other components of a communicating mind. Exeter: Exeter Linguistic Studies.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1951). General linguistics and descriptive grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society, 1951, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957 a). Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957 b). A synopsis of linguistic theory. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gregory, M. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, M. & Carroll, S. (1978). Language and situation – language varieties and their social contexts. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1956/1976). Grammatical categories in Modern Chinese. Transactions of the Philological Society 1956, 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1961/1976). Categories of the theory of grammar, Word, 17, 3, 241–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1962). The linguistic study of literary texts. In Lunt, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Reprinted in Chatman, S. and Levin, S. R. (eds.), Essays on the language of literature. Boston: Houghton Mufflin, 1967, 217–23.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1963/1976). Class in relation to the axes of chain and choice in language. Linguistics, 2, 5–15.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). Descriptive linguistics in literary studies. In Duthie, A. (ed.), English studies today: third series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Reprinted in Freeman, D. C. (ed.), Linguistics and literary style. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston, 1970.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. D. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1966 a/1976). Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 2, 1, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1966 b/1976). The English verbal group. (Nuffield Programme Work Paper, published for the first time in Kress/Halliday, 1976.)Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1966 c). The concept of rank: a reply. Journal of Linguistics, 2, 1, 110–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967 a). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 1, 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967 b). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 2, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967 c). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton (Janua Linguarum Series Practica 48).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967 d). Talk given to Nottingham Linguistic Circle, 05, 1967.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). Notes on transitivity and theme: Part 3. Journal of Linguistics, 4, 2, 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1969 a). Options and functions in the English clause. Brno Studies in English, 8, 81–8.Google Scholar

Reprinted in Householder, F. W. (ed.), Syntactic theory 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972, pp. 248–57.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1969 b/1973 b). Relevant models of language. Educational Review, 22, 1, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970 a). Language structure and language function, in Lyons, J. (ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 140–65.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970 b/1976). Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language, 6, 3, 140–65.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970 c/1976). A course in spoken English: intonation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1971 a/1973 b). Language in a social perspective. Educational Review, 23, 3, 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1971 b/1973 b). Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding's The Inheritors. In. Chatman, S. (ed), Literary style:a symposium. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 330–65.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1972 a/1973 b). Towards a sociological semantics. Working papers and prepublications (series C, no. 14). Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica, Università di Urbino.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1972 b/1978). Sociological aspects of language change. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists, 2, 853–79.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973 a/1973 b). The functional basis of language. In Bernstein, B. (ed.), Class, codes and control. Vol. 2: Applied studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 343–66.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973 b). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1974/1978). Discussion with Herman Parret. In Parret, H., Discussing language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975 a). Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975 b/1978). Language as social semiotic. In Makkaj, A. and Makkai, V. B. (eds.), The first LACUS forum. Columbia, S. Carolina: Hornbeam Press, 17–46.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1977 a). Types of linguistic structure, and their functional origins. Mimeo.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1977 b/1978). Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In van Dijkand, T. A. and Petöfi, J. S. (eds.), Grammarsand descriptions. Berlin: de Gruyter, 176–225.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (forthcoming). The meaning of modern English. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Fawcett, R. P. (eds.) (forthcoming). Current papers in systemic linguistics.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. D. (1965). Rank and depth. Language, 41, 574–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, R. A. (1967). Constituency in a systemic description of the English clause. Lingua, 18, 225–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, R. A. (1971). English complex sentences: an introduction to systemic grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. A. (1974). Systemic generative grammar. Linguistics, 139, 5–42.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. A. (1976). Arguments for a non-transformational grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kress, G. / Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Halliday: system and function in language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lamb, S. M. (1964). The sememic approach to structural semantics. American Anthropologist, 66, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leech, G. N. (1969). Towards a semantic description of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., The meaning of meanrng. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1935). Coral gardens and their magic, Vol. 2. London: Allen & Unwin. New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (forthcoming). The meaning of features in systemic linguistics. To appear in Halliday, M. A. K. and Fawcett, R. P., Current papers in systemic theory.Google Scholar

Matthews, P. H. (1966). The concept of rank in ‘neo-Firthian’ grammar, Journal of Linguistics, 2, 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCord, M. C. (1975). On the form of a systemic grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 11, 2, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monaghan, J. (forthcoming). The neo-Firthian tradition and its contribution to general linguistics. Ph.D. thesis, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Muir, J. (1972). A modern approach to English grammar – an introduction to systemic grammar. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Owens, J. (1977). Aspects of Nubi grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. McH. (1966). Taking a poem to pieces. In Fowler, R. (ed), Essays in style and language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 68–81.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. McH. (1968). A technique of stylistic description. Language and Style, 1, 215–42.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. McH. (1972). A course in spoken English: grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. McH. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse – the English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, F. S., Bowley, C. C., Brockett, C. S., Brown, J. G. & Goddard, P. R. (1968). English grammar – a linguistic study of its classes and structures. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. & Gregory, M. J. (1964). An approach to the study of style. In Enqvist, N. E., Spencer, J. and Gregory, M. J., Linguistics and style. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Turner, G. J. (1973). Social class and children's language of control at age five and seven. In Bernstein, B. (ed.), Class, codes and control. Vol. 2: Applied studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 135–201.Google Scholar

Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar