Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T07:58:41.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between lexical variation and lexical change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ellen Johnson
Ellen Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much has been written about the relationship between the usage of particular social groups and language change. This article reports on a longitudinal study of lexical variables that analyzed comparable data from the 1930s and 1990. Nearly 1,000 words were tested to determine differences in usage related to age, sex, race, education, region, and rurality. Another set of tests compared the terms used at each point in time. Yielding a list of words that exhibited both change and a pattern of social or regional variation, the results indicated that males, whites, older speakers, and speakers from rural areas use more older terms. The most educated speakers use more newer terms. These findings were reinforced by an analysis of “No Response” answers, especially on questions about obsolete or agricultural referents, which were more common among females, blacks, and urban dwellers. Most of the linguistic change was not accompanied by significant social variation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1993 , pp. 285 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Algeo, John. (1989). British–American lexical differences: A typology of interdialectal variation. In García, Ofelia & Otheguy, Ricardo (eds.), English across cultures — Cultures across English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Harold B. (1986). Sex-linked variation in the response of dialect informants. Part 3: Grammar. Journal of English Linguistics 19:149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Thomas, & Sand, Lori. (1991). The focus of linguistic innovation in Texas. English World-wide 12:195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Sand, Lori. (1991). The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3:241–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, John. (1983). Black street speech. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Cynthia. (1993). Measuring social causes of phonological variation in Texas. American Speech 68:227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K., & Trudgill, Peter. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christian, Donna, Wolfram, Walt, & Dube, Nanjo. (1988). Variation and change in geographically isolated communities: Appalachian and Ozark English. Tuscaloosa, AL: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Daniel, Pete. (1986). Standing at the crossroads: Southern life in the twentieth century. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (1992, 10). Gender in sociolinguistic research: Time for a paradigm shift. Paper presented at NWAV-XXI,Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. (1990). Heteronymy in international English. English World-wide 11:239–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Ellen. (1989, 05). Women's speech: Schoolmarmish, status-conscious, and conformist? Paper presented at the Women's Studies series,University of Georgia,Athens.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ellen. (in press-a). Lexical change and variation in the Southeastern United States, 1930–1990. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ellen. (in press-b). The distribution of variants of /aI/ in the Middle and South Atlantic states. In Viereck, Wolfgang (ed.), Verhandlungen des Internationalen Dialektologen Kongresses: Bamberg 29.7−4.8 1990. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. (in press). Southern speech and self-expression in an African-American woman's story. In Bernstein, Cynthia, Nunnally, Tom, & Sabino, Robin (eds.), Language variety in the South II. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1992). Isoglosses and predictive modeling. American Speech 67:227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr, & Lee, Jay. (1991, 10). Quantitative methods for word geography. Paper presented at NWAV-XX,Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr, McDavid, Virginia G., Lerud, Theodore K., & Johnson, Ellen. (eds.). (1994). Handbook of the linguistic atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic states. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. (1978). Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7:17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1:199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1949). A word geography of the eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1981). What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description? In Sankoff, David & Henrietta, Cedergren (eds.), Variation omnibus. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research. 179–200.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1991). The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.), New ways of analyzing sound change. New York: Academic. 1–44.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, E. L. (1975), Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. Jr (1979 [1970]). Changing patterns of southern dialects. In Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (ed.), Dialects in culture: Essays in general dialectology. University: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
McDavid, Virginia G. (1989, 12). Grammatical items in the north central states and the upper midwest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Dialect Society,Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Miller, Michael I. (1978). Inflectional morphology in Augusta, Georgia: A sociolinguistic description. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. (1992a). Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. (1992b, 10). Toward a social model for the interpretation of language change. Paper presented at NWAV-XXI,Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Language and social networks. 2nd ed.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee, McDaniel, Susan Leas, Bailey, Guy, & Bassett, Marvin (eds.). (1986). Handbook for the linguistic atlas of the Gulf states. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W., & Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1989). LAMSAS goes SASsy: Statistical methods and linguistic atlas data. Special Issue: Computer methods in dialectology. Journal of English Linguistics 22, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette, & Daveluy, Michelle. (1989). Quelques traces du passage du temps dans le parler des Montréalais, 1971–1984. Language Variation and Change 1:19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1991a). Dialects and American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1991b). The linguistic variable: Fact and fantasy. American Speech 66:22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar