Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T09:44:54.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rules of stress assignment in Québec French: Evidence from perceptual data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Claude Paradis  and
Denise Deshaies
Claude Paradis
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Denise Deshaies
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to contribute to the analysis of the prosodic system of Québec French in a variationist framework. However, major problems have to be resolved before one can give a comprehensive view of this system, one of these concerning stress assignment. In order to examine the validity of the traditional view claimed for French by most linguists, which states that stress is always superposed on the final syllable of lexical words, different perceptual tests were devised and carried out with two groups of students. The results of these tests show the effect of structural factors on the perception of stressed syllables in Québec French and demonstrate that this canonic rule does not always hold for varieties of Québec French. On the basis of these results, a subset of stress rules is then proposed and illustrated with examples of words tested in the perceptual tests. Counterexamples to these rules are thereafter discussed, and a reconsideration of the principles of syllabification that are usually taken for granted for French is proposed in light of variable rules.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 1990 , pp. 135 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, W. S. (1973). Accent and rhythm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boudreault, M. (1968). Rythme et mélodie de la phrase parlée en France et au Québec. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J. & Simoneau, L. (1985). La chute des voyelles hautes en français de Montréal: ‘As-tu entendu la belle syncope?’ In Les tendances dynamiques du français parlé à Montréal. Montréal: Gouvernement du Québec. 57–144.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1988). Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, F. (1984). L'accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (eds.), Forme sonore du langage. Structure des représentations en phonologie. Paris: Hermann. 65–122.Google Scholar
Everett, D. & Everett, K. (1984). Syllable onsets and stress placement in Pirahã. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3:105–116.Google Scholar
Fonagy, I. (1979). L'accent français: accent probabilitaire. Studia Phonetica 15:123–233.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. (1934). Évolution phonétique du français du XVle siècle à nos jours. Le français moderne 2:217–236.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1968). L'accent. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Germain, C. & LeBlanc, R. (1981). Introduction à la linguistique générale: I. La phonétique. Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1938). Traité pratique de prononciation française. 9e éd.Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1980). Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1:83–105.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1985). A metrical theory of stress rules. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. & McCully, C. B. (1987). Metrical phonology: A coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, L. (ed.), Studies in stress and accent. 37–82. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 4.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1931). Die Betonung und ihre Rolle in der Word- und Syntagma-phonologie. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague IV. Reprinted in Roman Jakobson: Selected writings I. The Hague: Mouton. 117–136.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1937). Über die Beschaffenheit der prosodischen Gegensätze. In Roman Jakobson. Selected writings I. The Hague: Mouton. 254–261.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Léon, P. & Léon, M. (1979). Observations sur l'accent des français régionaux. In Fonagy, I. & Léon, P. (eds.), L'accent en français contemporain (Studia Phonetica 15). Ottawa: Didier. 93–107.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8:249–336.Google Scholar
Malécot, A. (1977). Introduction à la phonétique française. La Haye and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Malmberg, B. (1975). La phonétique (Que sais-je? No. 637). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1979). Une théorie syntaxique de l'accentuation en français. In Fonagy, I. & Léon, P. (eds.), L'accent en français contemporain (Studia Phonetica 15). Ottawa: Didier. 1–13.Google Scholar
Newman, P. (1972). Syllable weight as a phonological variable. Studies in African Linguistics 3:301–323.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (1985). An acoustic study of variation and change in the vowel system of Chicoutimi and Jonquière (Québec). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1983). Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 11:511–562.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. (1968). Étude du rythme syllabique en français canadien et en français standard (Studia Phonetica 1). Ottawa: Didier. 161–174.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. & Sankoff, D. (1978). Advances in variable rule methodology. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 57–69.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syllable. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (1982).Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1969). Principles of phonology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Original work published 1939)Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) (1982). The structure of phonological representations (parts I and II). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Verluyten, S.-P. (1982). Recherche sur la prosodie et la métrique du français. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium.Google Scholar
Vinay, J.-P. (1955). Aperçu des études de phonétique canadienne. Études sur le parler français au Canada. 61–82.Google Scholar
Walker, D. C. (1984). The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar