Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T02:15:14.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The third dialect of English: Some Canadian evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Sandra Clarke,
Ford Elms and
Amani Youssef
Sandra Clarke
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Ford Elms
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Amani Youssef
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whereas Labov (1991) made a case for the existence of three major dialects of English, this article offers Canadian evience that runs counter to the idea of a relatively homogeneous North American third dialect area in which vowel systems remain fairly stable. It shows that the lax vowels of Canadian English are undergoing a substantial shift, the pivot for which is suggested to be vowel merger in the Cot/Caught sets. This shift is to some degree conditioned by the voicing properties and the manner of articulation of a following consonant; gender differences prove significant as well. The article also examines back vowel fronting in Candian English and its relationship to the shift affecting the front lax vowels, as well as to the general principles of vowel chain shifting articulated by Labov (1994). The Canadian Shift raises the issue of internal versus external motivation of vowel change; in addition, it brings, macrosociolinguistic evidence to bear on the purely microsociolinguistic interpretation of similar patterns of vowel shifting as symbols of local group identity (Eckert, 1991b).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , July 1995, pp. 209 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cheshire, Jenny (ed.). (1991). English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. (1991). Phonological variation and recent language change in St. John's English. In Cheshire, (1991). 108–122.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. (ed.). (1993). Focus on Canada. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, Keith M., Inkelas, Sharon, McNair-Knox, Faye C., & Rickford, John R. (eds.). (1987). Variation in language: NWAV- 15 at Stanford. Stanford University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
De Wolf, Gaelan Dodds. (1992). Social and regional factors in Canadian English: A study of phonological variables and grammatical items in Ottawa and Vancouver. Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna. (1988). Pronunciation and categorization in sound change. In Ferrara, Kathleen, Brown, Becky, Walters, Keith, & Baugh, John (eds.), Linguistic change and contact: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics. 84–92.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (ed.). (1991a). New ways of analyzing sound change. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (1991b). Social polarization and the choice of linguistic variants. In Eckert, (1991a). 213–232.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. (1991). Sociophonetic variation in Vancouver. In Cheshire, (1991). 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H., & Warkentyne, Henry J. (1993). Retracting of / æ/ in Vancouver English. In Clarke, (1993). 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habick, Timothy. (1991). Burnouts versus rednecks: Effects of group membership on the phonemic system. In Eckert, (1991a). 185–212.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J., & Wheeler, Kimberlee. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of American 97:3099–3111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, Leanne, Moonwomon, Birch, Bremner, Sue, Luthin, Herb, Van Clay, Mary, Lerner, Jean, & Corcoran, Hazel. (1987). It's not just the Vally girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting, Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. 117–128.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie. (1978). Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey. New York: Academic. 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Henrietta, Davison, John & Chambers, J. K. (1993). Comparative sociolinguistics of (aw)fronting. In Clarke, (1993). 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1991). The three dialects of English. In Eckert, (1991a). 1–4.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Volume I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luthin, Herbert W. (1987). The story of California (ow): The coming-of-age of English in California. In Denning, et al. (1987). 312–324.Google Scholar
McElhinny, Bonnie. (1992). Gender at work: The use of Phonological variables by White police officers in Pittsburgh. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXI,Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Meechan, Marjory. (1992). Register in Khmer: The laryngeal specification of pharyngeal expansion. Master's thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Meixner, Laura. (1994). Variation and change in Toronto English: (ε) and (æ). Undergraduate linguistics paper, York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
Moonwomon, Birch. (1987). Truly awesome: (b)in California English. In Denning, et al. (1987). 325–336.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24:175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. ([1989]1993). Vowel changes in Columbus, Ohio. Journal of English Linguistics 22:205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Summers, W. (1987). Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: Articulatory and acoustic analyses. Journal of the Acoustical of America 82:847–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Summers, W. (1988). F1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84:485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Howard B. (1979). A sociodialectology survey of the English spoken in Ottawa: A study of sociological and stylistic variation in Canadian English. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Woods, Howard B. (1993). A synchronic study of English spoken in Ottawa: Is Canadian English becoming more American? In Clarke, (1993). 151–178.Google Scholar