Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:08:24.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Abawiri Tone System in Typological Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Brendon Yoder
Brendon Yoder*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara and SIL International
*
[byoder@ucsb.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abawiri (Indonesia: Lakes Plain) is a previously undescribed Papuan language. Two level tones (/L/ and /H/) combine into eight tone melodies on nouns (/L/, /H/, /LH/, /HL/, /LH/, /LHL/, //, and ) and five on verbs (/L/, /H/, /LH/, /LH/, and ). The default pitch of tonelessness is L. Several phonological processes involve tone. /H/ is lowered to M tone after a floating /L/. A polar (H) is linked to the final syllable of a non-/H/ word previous to an /L/-toned word. Utterance-final boundary tone L% is linked to all utterance-final syllables. /H/ spreads to the end of nouns but does not spread on verbs. A final section discusses typological characterization of the Abawiri tone system.

Keywords

toneAbawiriPapuan languagestypology of tonetwo-height tone systemstonal polaritycategory-specific effects

Information

Type
Phonological Analysis
Information
Language , Volume 94 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. e266 - e292
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.) 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranovich, Raul. 1994. The tone system of Acatlán Mixtec and some exceptions to the OCP. Linguistic Notes from La Jolla 17. 3–26.Google Scholar
Bateman, Janet. 1986. Iau verb morphology. NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia 26. 1–76. Online: http://sealang.net/nusa/.Google Scholar
Bateman, Janet. 1990. Iau segmental and tone phonology. NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia 32. 29–42. Online: http://sealang.net/nusa/.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael. 2003. Lexical stratification of Hebrew—the disyllabic maximum. Proceedings of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics (IATL) 19. Online: http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/19/Becker.pdf.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2013. Relatedness as a factor in language contact. Journal of Language Contact 6. 411-32. DOI: 10.1163/19552629-00602010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Eric. 2016. Tone and inflection in Zenzontepec Chatino. Tone and inflection: New facts and new perspectives, ed. by Palancar, Enrique L. and Léonard, Jean Léo, 141-62. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 2001. Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. Distinctive feature theory, ed. by Hall, T. Alan, 71–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clouse, Duane. 1993. Languages of the western Lakes Plains. IRIAN: Bulletin of Irian Jaya Development 21. 1–32. Online: http://papuaweb.org/dlib/irian/21.pdf.Google Scholar
Clouse, Duane. 1997. Toward a reconstruction and reclassification of the Lakes Plain languages of Irian Jaya. Papers in Papuan Linguistics 2. 133–236. Online: http://sealang.net/archives/pl/pdf/PL-A85.133.pdf.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daly, John P., and Hyman, Larry M.. 2007. On the representation of tone in Peñoles Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(2). 165–207. DOI: 10.1086/519057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Lourens. 1993. Forms and functions in Kombai, an Awyu language of Irian Jaya. (Pacific linguistics B-108.) Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 1997. Tone systems in New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 1(3). 347-86. DOI: 10.1515/lity.1997.1.3.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2003. The tonal system of Skou, New Guinea. Proceedings of the symposium Cross-linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Historical development, phonetics of tone, and descriptive studies, ed. by Kaji, Shigeki, 329-65. Tokyo: University of Foreign Studies Research Institute for Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, Gaol, Rismawaty L., Harms, Lenice; and Ng, Philina. 2006. Doutai phonology. Melbourne: Monash University, ms.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A., Bateman, Janet; and Miehle, Helen. 1992. Tone contours and tone clusters in Iau. Berkeley Linguistics Society 18. 92–103. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v18i2.1544.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 2000. The languages of New Guinea. Annual Review of Anthropology 29. 357–404. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 2010. Language contact in the New Guinea region. The handbook of language contact, ed. by Hickey, Raymond, 795–813. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1979. Autosegmental phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2001. A typology of contour tone restrictions. Studies in Language 25(3). 423-62. DOI: 10.1075/sl.25.3.03gor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25–70. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226705003683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663-87. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2010.0021.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie. 1974. Universals of downdrift: Their phonetic basis and significance for a theory of tone. Studies in African Linguistics 5. 169-83.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31. 213-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2010. Amazonia and the typology of tone systems. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 6. 376-94. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4qr2h33t.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2012. Markedness, faithfulness, and two-height tone systems. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). 1–13. Online: https://www.mcgill.ca/mcgwpl/files/mcgwpl/hyman2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2014. How to study a tone language, with exemplification from Oku (Grassfields Bantu, Cameroon). Language Documentation & Conservation 8. 525-62. DOI: 10125/24624.Google Scholar
Jenison, D. Scott, and Jenison, Priscilla B.. 1991. Obokuitai phonology. Workpapers in Indonesian Languages and Cultures 9. 69–90.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 2011. Japanese pitch accent. The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. by Oostendorp, Marc Van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 2879–2907. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 2014. Orthography and tone: A tone-system typology with implications for orthography development. Developing orthographies for unwritten languages, ed. by Cahill, Michael and Rice, Keren, 49–72. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1982. Metrical or autosegmental. The structure of phonological representations, ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der and Smith, Norval, 177-90. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F.; and Fennig, Charles D. (eds.) 2017. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 20th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Online: http://www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark, and Pierrehumbert, Janet B.. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. Language sound structure: Studies in phonology, ed. by Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard T., 157–233. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liem, Joseph Kristianto. 2007. Phonological sketch of Sikaritai. Jayapura, Indonesia, ms.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1978. Universals of tone. Universals of human language, vol. 2: Phonology, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A., and Moravcsik, Edith A., 335-64. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013a. Front rounded vowels. The world atlas of language structures online, ed. by Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Online: http://wals.info/chapter/11.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013b. Tone. The world atlas of language structures online, ed. by Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Online: http://wals.info/chapter/13.Google Scholar
Martin, David L. 1991. Sikaritai phonology. Workpapers in Indonesian Languages and Cultures 9. 91–120.Google Scholar
McAllister, Lawrence, and McAllister, Kay. 1991. The process of phonological change in Doutai. Workpapers in Indonesian Languages and Cultures 9. 121-41.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura. 2011. Tonal underspecification and interpolation in Tommo So. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles master's thesis.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2016. Typology, documentation, description, and typology. Linguistic Typology 20(3). 467-72. DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2016-0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muetze, Bettina. 2014. A sketch of the Mursi language. Gloucester, UK: Redcliffe College master's thesis.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 1998. Surface underspecification of tone in Chichewa. Phonology 15. 367-91. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4420135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris. 1985. Aspects of the grammar of Yagua: A typological perspective. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1948. Tone languages: A technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2004. A note on tonal markedness in Yoruba. Phonology 21(3). 409-25. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675704000326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, ed. by Durie, Mark and Ross, Malcolm D., 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, Susan, and van den Berg, René. 2006. A new mass elicitation technique: The dictionary development program. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Philippines.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. 2011. Category-specific effects. The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. by Oostendorp, Marc van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 2439-63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snider, Keith. 1999. The geometry and features of tone. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Clemens L. 1975. Languages of Irian Jaya: Checklist, preliminary classification, language maps, wordlists. (Pacific linguistics B-31.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wurm, Stefan. 1954. Tonal languages in New Guinea and the adjacent islands. Anthropos 49(3/4). 697–702. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40450925.Google Scholar
Yoder, Brendon. 2017a. Participatory orthography development in Abawiri. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language Documentation & Conservation (ICLDC5), Honolulu. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/42060.Google Scholar
Yoder, Brendon. 2017b. Grammatical relations: How Abawiri works without them. Paper presented at the 26th annual Linguistics Symposium at California State University, Fullerton.Google Scholar