Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T14:23:09.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Investigation of Phonological Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Eugène J. Brière
Eugène J. Brière*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The ease or difficulty of learning phonological categories, experienced by a speaker of language X attempting to learn language Y, has been attributed by linguists to (1) the competing phonemic categories of native language (N) and target language (T) systems, (2) the allophonic membership of these phonemic categories, and (3) the distributions of these categories within their respective systems. It has been noted that the higher the degree of similarity between the N and T phonological categories, the easier it is for the speaker to learn the T phonological categories, and the converse has been held to be true.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 42 , Issue 4-Part1 , December 1966, pp. 768 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This work was supported in part by the Center for Research in Languages and Linguistics, UCLA, directed by Jaan Puhvel, and in part by the Human Communication Laboratory, Department of Psychology, UCLA, directed by Edward C. Carterette. Special thanks are extended to Peter Ladefoged and Laurence Thompson for constant encouragement throughout the project. A more detailed treatment of this problem can be found in my forthcoming monograph, A psycholinguistic study of phonological interference (The Hague, Mouton).

References

Armstrong, Lilias E. 1932. The phonetics of French. London, Bell.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York, Holt.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L. 1956. Frequency of consonant clusters in French. Journal of the Canadian Linguistic Association 2. 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carterette, E., and Jones, Margaret H. 1965. Contextual constraints in the language of the child. Office of Education, U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Coöperative Research Project no. 1877.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1946. Les indices acoustiques de la parole: Premier rapport. Phonetica 2. 242–8.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11. 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Allen. 1960. Experimental design in psychological research. New York, Rinehart.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1951. Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Harrell, Richard S. 1957. The phonology of colloquial Arabic. New York, American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Mufaxxama—the ‘emphatic’ phonemes in Arabic. Studies presented to Joshua Whatmough, ed. by Pulgram, Ernst, 105–17. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1963. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, James. 1954. The learning theory approach. Psycholinguistics, ed. by Osgood, Charles and Sebeok, Thomas, 20–34. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Jones, R. B. Jr., and Thong, Huynh Sanh. 1957. Introduction to spoken Vietnamese. Washington, D.C., American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Nancy. 1960. Problems of Americans mastering the pronunciation of Egyptian Arabic. Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lehn, Walter, and Slager, William. 1959. A contrastive study of Egyptian Arabic and American English: the segmental phonemes. Language Learning 9. 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léon, Pierre. 1963. Perception of French vowels by American listeners. Études de linguistique appliquée, 2, ed. by Quemada, B., 135–46. Paris, Didier.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1943. Le système consonantique du français moderne. Copenhague, Gleerup.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1963. Structural linguistics and human communication. New York, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGeoch, J. A. 1942. The psychology of human learning: an introduction. New York, Longmans.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1962a. The sounds of English and German. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1962b. Toward a classification of pronunciation errors. Modern Language Journal 40:3.101–9.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles. 1949. The similarity paradox in human learning: a resolution. Psychological Review 56. 132–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Eunice. 1959. A test for predicting phonetic ability. Language Learning 9. 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politzer, Robert. 1960. Teaching French: an introduction to applied linguistics. Boston and New York, Ginn.Google Scholar
Postman, Leo, 1961. The present status of interference theory. Verbal learning and verbal behavior, ed. by Cofer, Charles, 152–96. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Saporta, Sol. 1955. Frequency of consonant clusters. Lg. 31. 25–31.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert, and Bowen, J. Donald. 1965. The sounds of English and Spanish. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1959. Saigon phonemics. Lg. 35. 454–78.Google Scholar
Trager, George L., and Smith, Henry Lee Jr. 1957. An outline of English structure. Washington, D.C., American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Troubetskoy, N. S. 1955. Principes de phonologie (J. Cantineau, translator). Paris, Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Underwood, B. J. 1945. The effect of successive interpolations on retroactive and proactive inhibition. Psychological Monographs 59:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, B. J. 1957. Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review 64. 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdman, Albert. 1961. Applied linguistics: French. Boston, Heath.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact. New York, Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. 1962. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Hans. 1950. Partial comparisons of the sound system of English and Puerto Rican Spanish. Language Learning 3. 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar