Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:30:23.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chance CVC Correspondences in Unrelated Languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Marvin L. Bender
Marvin L. Bender*
Affiliation:
Language Survey of Ethiopia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various proposals have been advanced concerning what has been referred to as ‘refutation of the nil hypothesis’ in language comparisons, i.e. that the sound-meaning correspondences found for any two particular languages are within the range of what one would expect by sheer coincidence. Swadesh concludes that at 95% confidence level, four or more cognates in a list of 100 basic vocabulary items justify accepting a hypothesis of genetic relationship. H. K. J. Cowan estimates that the existence of three or more cognates is sufficient at the same level. Both these proposals are based on mathematical formulations, Cowan’s the more sophisticated. Approaching the problem from the empirical side, 100-item lists in 21 languages are here used to arrive at a conclusion that the presence of more than two solid CVC sound-meaning correspondences in languages believed to be unrelated raises a strong probability that more than chance is involved.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 1969, pp. 519 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Batchelor, John. 1926. An Ainu-English-Japanese dictionary. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Collinder, Björn. 1948. La parenté linguistique et le calcul des probabilités. (Uppsala Universitet, Årsskrift, 1948, no. 13: Språkvetenskapliga Sällskapets forhandlingar, pp. 1–24.)Google Scholar
Cowan, H. K. J. 1962. Statistical determination of linguistic relationships. Studia Linguistica 16.57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. The languages of Africa. (Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, publ. 25.) Bloomington.Google Scholar
Lorimer, D. L. R. 1938. The Burushaski language, vol. 3: vocabularies and index. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
McQuown, Norman. 1955. The indigenous languages of Latin America. American Anthropologist 57.501–70.10.1525/aa.1955.57.3.02a00080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parzen, Emanuel. 1964. Modern probability theory and its applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rea, John A. 1958. Concerning the validity of lexicostatistics. IJAL 24.145–50.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1954. Perspectives and problems of Amerindian comparative linguistics. Word 10.306–32.10.1080/00437956.1954.11659530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournier, André, and Lafitte, Pierre. 1953. Lexique français-basque. Bayonne: Éditions ‘Herria’.Google Scholar