Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:54:32.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chomsky on Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Jerrold J. Katz
Jerrold J. Katz*
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper critically examines Chomsky's position on meaning, considering its development over the years, its significance for other areas of grammatical theory and for related areas outside linguistics, and its methodological, empirical, and philosophical bases. Focus is on the points of disagreement between Chomsky's position and the author's, and it is argued that a close examination of the bases for Chomsky's position shows that it should be rejected.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 1 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bever, Thomas G., Katz, Jerrold J.; and Langendoen, D. Terence (eds.) 1976. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1936. Language or ideas? Lg. 12. 89–95.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA (mimeographed). [Later published as Chomsky 1975b.].Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. Review of Verbal behavior, by Skinner, B. F. Lg. 35. 26–58.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1967. Recent contributions to the theory of innate ideas. Synthèse 17. 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1972a. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In his Studies on semantics in generative grammar, 62–119. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1972b. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In his Studies on semantics in generative grammar, 120–204.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975a. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975b. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on form and interpretation. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Ronat, M. 1977. Dialogues avec Mitsou Ronat. Paris: Flammarion. [English version: Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon, 1979.].Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75. 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, Robert W. 1974. Semantic conditions on surface structure. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, Emmon & Harms, Robert T., 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry D., Fodor, Janet A.; and Garrett, Merrill F. 1975. The psychological unreality of semantic representations. LI 6. 515–32.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts, ed. by Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L., 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1967. Studies in lexical relations. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Keith (ed.) 1975. Language, mind, and knowledge. (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, 7.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. 1976. Logical form and implicature. In Bever, Katz & Langendoen, 313–92.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Fred, and Katz, Jerrold J. 1977. Is necessity the mother of intension? Philosophical Review 86. 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1974. Where things now stand with the analytic-synthetic distinction. Synthèse 28. 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1975a. Logic and language: an examination of recent criticisms of intensionalism. In Gunderson, 36–130.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1975b. The dilemma between orthodoxy and identity. Philosophia 5. 297–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1976a. Exorcising skepticism. Philosophical Studies 29. 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1976b. Global rules and surface structure interpretation. In Bever, Katz & Langendoen, 415–25.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1977a. Propositional structure and illocutionary force. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1977b. A proper theory of names. Philosophical Studies 31. 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1977c. The real status of semantic representations. LI 8. 500–84.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1979. The neoclassical theory of reference. Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language, ed. by French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., & Wettstein, H. K., 103–24. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., and Bever, Thomas G. 1976. The fall and rise of empiricism. In Bever, Katz & Langendoen, 11–64.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., and Postal, Paul. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1971. Presupposition and relative well-formedness. Semantics, ed. by Steinberg, Danny & Jakobovits, Leon, 329–40. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1978. Review of Chomsky 1977. Journal of Philosophy 75. 270–79.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Harold. 1977. Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2. 1–22.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1962. It ain't necessarily so. Journal of Philosophy 59. 658–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1970. Is semantics possible? Metaphilosophy 1. 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Gunderson, 131–93.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1953. Two dogmas of empiricism. In his From a logical point of view, 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1965. Necessary truth. In his The ways of paradox, 48–56. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1970. The philosophy of logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Each and every, any and all. In his Linguistics in philosophy, 70–96. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar