Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:23:36.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contact-Induced Variation in Transylvanian Saxon Verb Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Ariana Bancu
Ariana Bancu*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
*
[abancu@umich.edu]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article illustrates two-verb clusters in Viscri Saxon, a dialect of Transylvanian Saxon (TrSax) spoken in Viscri, Romania, along with Romanian and Standard German. The orders found in Viscri Saxon verb clusters are encountered in West Germanic varieties related to TrSax (e.g. Moselle Franconian, Luxembourgish), but the distributions differ from the ones discussed in other varieties (Dubenion-Smith 2010, Wurmbrand 2017). I argue that word-order variation in Viscri Saxon is the result of syntactic transfer from Standard German, and show that there is flexible distribution between possible word orders. Furthermore, speakers with different linguistic profiles use the available constructions to different degrees, thus illustrating the roles of German and Romanian in the progression of contact-induced changes in Viscri Saxon.

Keywords

verb clustersTransylvanian Saxoncontact-induced language changeword-order variation

Information

Type
Historical Syntax
Information
Language , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , June 2019, pp. e193 - e215
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ASD. Audioatlas Siebenbürgisch-Sächsischer Dialekte. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. Online: http://www.asd.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/, last accessed February 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Backus, Ad, Seza Doğruöz;, A. and Heine, Bernd. 2011. Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change: Evidence from synchronic vs. diachronic contact situations. Language Sciences 33(5). 738-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse, Gelman, Susan A.; and Beck, Erica. 2016. Testing the role of convergence in language acquisition, with implications for creole genesis. International Journal of Bilingualism 20(3). 269-96. DOI: 10.1177/1367006914552459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, David, Gertken, Libby M.; and Amengual, Mark. 2012. Bilingual language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. Austin: COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. Online: https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual/.Google Scholar
Bruch, Robert. 1973. Précis populaire de grammaire luxembourgeoise. Luxembourg: Éditions de la Section de Linguistique de l'Institut gr.-d.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2003. Dynamics of language contact: English and immigrant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsale, Andrea, and Iorio, Monica. 2014. Transylvanian Saxon culture as heritage: Insights from Viscri, Romania. Geoforum 52. 22–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custred, Glynn. 1989. Eine soziolinguistische Untersuchung des Sprachgebrauchs der Siebenbürger Sachsen. Zeitschrift für Siebenbürgische Landeskunde 2. 144-51.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1994. The syntax of Romanian. (Comparative studies in Romance.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogaru, Dana Janetta. 2007. Zur Sprachqualität der frühneuhochdeutschen Predigten des siebenbürgisch-sächsischen Pfarrers Damasus Dürr. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 74. 1–19. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40505242.Google Scholar
Dubenion-Smith, Shannon A. 2008. Verbal complex phenomena in the West Central German dialects. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison dissertation.Google Scholar
Dubenion-Smith, Shannon A. 2010. Verbal complex phenomena in West Central German: Empirical domain and multi-causal account. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(2). 99–191. DOI: 10.1017/S1470542709990249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin, and Riemsdijk, Henk van (eds.) 2004. Verb clusters: A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch. (Linguistik aktuell/Linguistics today 69.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey. 2006. Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia: From top to bottom. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W., 195–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haldenwang, Sigrid. 2013. Siebenbürgisch–luxemburgische Sprachbeziehungen (Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede). Forschungen zur Volks- und Landeskunde 56. 133-44.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey G. 1984. Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology 13. 367-84. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. The framework. Language contact and grammatical change, ed. by Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 1–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzträger, Fritz. 1912. Syntaktische Funktion der Wortformen im Nösnischen. Tübingen: Universität zu Tübingen dissertation.Google Scholar
Isbăşescu, Mihai, and Mantsch, Heinrich. 1975. Sprachwandel in der Mundart Aufgrund des Siebenbürgisch-Sächsischen. Sprache der Gegenwart: Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch 34(2). 172-90.Google Scholar
Jendraschek, Gerd. 2007. Basque in contact with other languages. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W., 143-62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kantarovich, Jessica, and Grenoble, Lenore. 2017. Reconstructing sociolinguistic variation. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 2:27. DOI: 10.3765/plsa.v2i0.4080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaster-Ungureanu, Grete. 2015. Zur Entstehung des Korpus. Zwischen traditioneller Dialektologie und digitaler Geolinguistik: Der Audioatlas siebenbürgisch-sächsischer Dialekte (ASD) (Korpus im Text 2), ed. by Krefeld, Thomas, Lücke, Stephan, and Mages, Emma, 17–23. Münster: Monsenstein & Vannerdat. DOI: 10.5282/ubm/epub.25627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Karl Kurt. 1961. Flandrenses in Siebenbürgen. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 28(1). 43–70. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40499963.Google Scholar
McClure, Malcolm M. 1973. A grammar of the Weingartskirchen dialect of Transylvanian German. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, and O'Shannessy, Carmel. 2012. Typological constraints on verb integration in two Australian mixed languages. Journal of Language Contact 5(2). 216-46. DOI: 10.1163/19552629-006001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2015. Turning variation on its head: Analysing subject prefixes in Nkep (Vanuatu) for language documentation. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1(1). 78–108. DOI: 10.1075/aplv.1.1.04mey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monachesi, Paula. 2005. The verbal complex in Romance: A case study in grammatical interfaces. (Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics 9.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274758.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, Mangesh V. 1975. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language 51(3). 672-83. DOI: 10.2307/412892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, Iannozzi, Michael; and Heap, David. 2017. Faetar null subjects: A variationist study of a heritage language in contact. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 249. 31–47. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2017-0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, and Kochetov, Alexei. 2013. Voice onset time across the generations: A cross-linguistic study of contact-induced change. Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education, ed. by Siemund, Peter, Gogolin, Ingrid, Schulz, Monika Edith, and Davydova, Julia, 19–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ney, Karin. 1984. Rumänische Transferenzen in vier siebenbürgisch-sächsischen Ortsmundarten des Kreises Hermannstadt/Rumänien. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Olthof, Marieke, Westendorp, Maud, Bloem, Jelke; and Weerman, Fred. 2017. Synchronic variation and diachronic change in Dutch two-verb clusters. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taalen Letterkunde 1(1). 34–60.Google Scholar
O'Shannessy, Carmel. 2011. Language contact and change in endangered languages. The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, ed. by Austin, Peter and Sallabank, Julia, 78–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, Zentella, Ana Celia; and Livert, David. 2007. Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language 83(4). 770–802. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2008.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapp, Christopher D. 2011. The verbal complex in subordinate clauses from medieval to modern German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schullerus, Adolf. 1906. Zur Heimat der Väter. Regensburg: Druck von J. Drotleff.Google Scholar
Seiler, Guido. 2008. On three types of dialect variation and their implications for linguistic theory: Evidence from verb clusters in Swiss German dialects. Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Kortmann, Bernd, 367-99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sift, Johannes. 2015. ‚Bevor ich meine Erzählung an werde fangen …': Untersuchungen zur morphosyntaktischen Variation von Partikelverben mit ab-, an-, auf- und aus- im Siebenbürgisch-Sächsischen. Dialektologie und digitaler Geolinguistik: Der Audioatlas siebenbürgisch-sächsischer Dialekte (ASD) (Korpus im Text 2), ed. by Krefeld, Thomas, Lücke, Stephan, and Mages, Emma, 189–210. Münster: Monsenstein & Vannerdat. DOI: 10.5282/ubm/epub.25627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2001. Language contact. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2010. Contact explanations in linguistics. The handbook of language contact, ed. by Hickey, Raymond, 31–47. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2014. Contact-induced language change and typological congruence. Congruence in contact-induced language change: Language families, typological resemblance, and perceived similarity, ed. by Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Dermarkar, Cynthia, Pfänder, Stefan, and Rabus, Achim, 201-18.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. Introduction: The field of contact linguistics. An introduction to contact linguistics, 1–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Brugman, Hennie, Russel, Albert, Klassmann, Alex; and Sloetjes, Han. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), 1556-59. Online: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006/.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2017. Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., ed. by Everaert, Martin and Riemsdijk, Henk van. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom103.Google Scholar