Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T07:26:26.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic growth and linguistic theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Geoffrey Sampson
Geoffrey Sampson*
Affiliation:
University of South Africa
*
[tsampsgr@unisa.ac.za]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This ‘short shot’ article draws attention to an unresolved contradiction between fundamental assumptions of modern linguistics and economics. Endogenous growth theory has become the consensus explanation of the phenomenon of long-term economic growth. This theory makes an assumption that is not seen as controversial by economists, namely, that the supply of new, unanticipated ideas is limited only by the level of resources committed to idea generation. Much linguistic theorizing, by contrast, assumes that potential human cognitive products are tightly constrained by biology. Although linguists and economists are primarily interested in different kinds of ‘ideas’, there is a real contradiction between the respective assumptions. The article does not offer a resolution of the contradiction, but encourages members of our discipline to be aware of it as a problem needing to be resolved.

Keywords

economic growthendogenous growth theoryRomerlanguage of thoughtinnate knowledgebiolinguistics

Information

Type
Perspectives
Information
Language , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , September 2014, pp. e144 - e148
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ballasy, Nicholas. 2010. White House science czar says he would use ‘free market’ to ‘de-develop’ the United States. CNSNews.com, September 16, 2010. Online: http://cnsnews.com/node/75388, accessed January 2, 2012.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2. 3. 113–24. [Reprinted in Readings in mathematical psychology, vol. 2, ed. by R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter, 105–24. New York: Wiley, 1963.].Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Reflections on language. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Crafts, Nick. 1996. ‘Post-neoclassical endogenous growth theory’: What are its policy implications? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12. 2. 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist. 2013. Has the ideas machine broken down? The Economist, January 12, 2013, 20–23.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert J. 2012. Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. (Policy insight 63.) London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, September 2012. Online: http://www.cepr.org/sites/default/fnes/policy_insights/PolicyInsight63.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan. 2004. The mystery of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1993. Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2012. Is growth over? The New York Times online: The Opinion Pages, December 26, 2012. Online: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/is-growth-over/.Google Scholar
Pielke, Robert. 2012. Is economic growth coming to an end? How Robert Gordon misreads the data and what it tells us about the dismal science. The Breakthrough, September 26, 2012. Is economic growth coming to an end? How Robert Gordon misreads the data and what it tells us about the dismal science. The Breakthrough, September 26, 2012: The Breakthrough Institute. Online: http://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/voices/roger-pielke-jr/is-economic-growth-coming-to-an-end/.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. London: Penguin.10.1037/e412952005-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, Matt. 2011. The rational optimist. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul Μ. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94. 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul Μ. 1990. Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy 98. S71-S102.10.1086/261725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul Μ. 1994. New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions. Journal of Development Economics 43. 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warsh, David. 2006. Knowledge and the wealth of nations: A story of economic discovery. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198700029.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar