No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2026
A major goal of the Editor's Department column is to demystify the editorial process, so that all readers—not just ‘old hands‘—will understand what goes on in the journal office. Here I will discuss the policy and practice of refereeing (i.e. reading and evaluating) submissions to Language. These comments are meant both to inform authors about how their submissions are evaluated and to inform referees about what the editor needs to know.
This essay is a revised version of a talk given as part of a panel discussion that was organized at the 1987 LSA meeting in San Francisco by the Committee on the Status of Women in Linguistics. I am grateful to Richmond Thomason. who was then editor of the Journal of Philosophical Logic, for helpful comments on an earlier draft.