Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T13:32:24.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evans’s (2014) modularity myths: A mental architecture digest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Iris Berent
Iris Berent*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
*
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University [i.berent@neu.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Alternative (Re)views
Information
Language , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 195 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berent, Iris. 2013. The phonological mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berent, Iris, Brem, Anna-Katherine, Zhao, Xu, Seligson, Erica, Pan, Hong, Epstein, Jane, Galaburda, Albert M.; and Pascual-Leone, Alvaro. 2015. Role of the motor system in language knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112. 1983–88. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1416851112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, Susan. 2009. The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Susan, and Spelke, Elizabeth. 1996. Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science 63.51533. DOI: 10.1086/289971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3. 1–61. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00001515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firestone, Chaz, and Scholl, Brian J.. 2015. Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, and Pylyshyn, Zenon. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28. 3–71. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, David Maximiliano, Berent, Iris, Benavides-Varela, Silvia, Bion, Ricardo A. H., Cattarossi, Luigi, Nespor, Marina; and Mehler, Jacques. 2014. Language universals at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111. 5837–41. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318261111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, Gary F. 2004. The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. New York: Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 2004 [1993]. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt. 2003. Nature via nurture: Genes, experience, and what makes us human. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard. 2004. Innateness in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8. 136–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed