Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:19:58.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for phonological constraints on nuclear accent placement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

James German ,
Janet Pierrehumbert  and
Stefan Kaufmann
James German*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Janet Pierrehumbert*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Stefan Kaufmann*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, 2016 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4090, [j-german@northwestern.edu], [jbp@babel.ling.northwestern.edu], [kaufmann@northwestern.edu]
Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, 2016 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4090, [j-german@northwestern.edu], [jbp@babel.ling.northwestern.edu], [kaufmann@northwestern.edu]
Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, 2016 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4090, [j-german@northwestern.edu], [jbp@babel.ling.northwestern.edu], [kaufmann@northwestern.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion Notes
Information
Language , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 151 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altenberg, Bengt. 1987. Prosodic patterns in spoken English. (Studies in the correlation between prosody and grammar for text-to-speech conversion 76). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 1997. Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21. 43–58.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. Studies in general and oriental linguistics, ed. by Jakobson, Roman and Kawamoto, Shigeo, 183–216. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language Research.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Vergnaud, Jean Roger. 1987. Stress and the cycle. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 45–84.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark, and Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1993. Alignment and prosodic heads. Paper presented at the tenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, and Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, ms.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 2003. Optimality theory in phonology. International encyclopedia of linguistics, ed. by Frawley, William John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael S. 1986. Focus in generative grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochemont, Michael S. 1998. Phonological focus and structural focus. Syntax and semantics: The limits of syntax, ed. by McNally, Louise and Culicover, Peter W., 337–63. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7. 141–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Goldsmith, John A., 550–69. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Welby, Pauline. 2003. Effects of pitch accent position, type, and status on focus projection. Language and Speech 46. 53–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed