Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:59:36.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological Haplology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Joseph Paul Stemberger
Joseph Paul Stemberger*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A fairly common phenomenon of inflection is morphological haplology, in which an affix or clitic is absent when the adjacent part of the stem is homophonous to it, e.g. Eng. poss. pl. boys', not boys's. Data are adduced from numerous affixes and clitics in eleven languages. Haplology may be a major or minor rule; it may show lexical diffusion; and it is subject to various specifications on how similar the ‘homophonous’ part of the stem must be, including degrees of phonological similarity and whether it too is a morpheme. These data are traditionally handled with a rule of deletion or haplology. Such an analysis is undesirable because of the false step required—the fact that deletion does no more than recover the input form; it does not explain why it is always the affix that is deleted, rather than part of the stem. It also does not explain why a haplologized clitic must always dominate the other morpheme/phonological sequence. The alternative is not to add the affix/clitic at all. This is best viewed as a case of vacuous rule application, where the rule may take the input as already satisfying the conditions of the output. Such a proposal can be made only within a morphology that stresses the prosodic nature of morphemes, as in autosegmental morphology. The origins of this phenomenon in child language and in language change are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 791 - 817
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allén, Sture. 1970. Nusvensk frequensordbok. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14.150–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. 1947. English verb inflection. Lg. 23.399–418.Google Scholar
Camaj, Martin. 1969. Lehrbuch der albanischen Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1968. On haplology in Indo-European. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen R. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1977a. Phono-morphological dissimilation. Phonologica 1976, ed. by Dressier, W. & Pfeiffer, O. (Innsbrucker Beitra, ge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 19), 41–8. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1977b. Elements of a polycentristic theory of word formation. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 15.13–22.Google Scholar
Eliasson, Stig, and LaPelle, Nancy. 1973. Generativa regler för svenskans kvantitet. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 88.133–48.Google Scholar
Ernault, Émile. 1886. Du parfait en grec et en latin. Paris: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Grammont, Maurice. 1930. Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Gross, Maurice. 1967. Sur une règle de ‘cacophonie’. Langages 7.105–19.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1975. Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. (Pennsylvania working papers on linguistic change and variation, 1:4.) Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Harris, James W. 1979. Non-concatenative morphology and Spanish plurals. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hauer, Erich. 1952. Handwörterbuch der Mandschusprache. Tokyo: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles. 1947. Problems of morphemic analysis. Lg. 23.321–43.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1976. Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan, and Terrell, Tracy. 1976. Stress assignment in Spanish: A natural generative analysis. Glossa 10.64–110.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1954. A Modern English grammar on historical principles, VI. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1979. Zero in morphology: A means of making up for phonological losses? MS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecours, André R., and Lhermitte, François. 1969. Phonemic paraphasias: Linguistic structure and tentative hypotheses. Cortex 5.193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1976. On the structure of morphological operations. Linguistische Berichte 44.1–29.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 1979. Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, John M. 1973. The surface structure of Portuguese: Plurals and other things. Linguistics 111.67–82.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1979. Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald G. 1969. Forward and backward masking in motor systems. Kybernetik 6.57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, Brian. 1978. The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 43, whole no. 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Lise, and MacWhinney, Brian. 1980. Towards a psychology of morphological marking: Evidence from linguistic structure, child language, and language dysfunction. MS.Google Scholar
Nicklas, Thurston D. 1972. The elements of Choctaw. University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1978. A concise Manchu-English lexicon. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
SAOL. 1976. Svenska Akademiens ordlista över svenska språket. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Sigurd, Bengt. 1967. Adjektivkomparationens morfologi. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 82.250–68.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. 1980. Another look at Grassmann's Law. Glossa 14.113–35.Google Scholar
Telemann, Ulf. 1969. Böjningssuffixens form i nusvenskan. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 84.163–208.Google Scholar
Wessen, Elias. 1965. Svensk språkhistoria. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Wessen, Elias. 1968. Vårt svenska språk. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Witting, Claes. 1977. Studies in Swedish generative phonology. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar