Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T04:21:12.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Non-Uniqueness of Linguistic Intuitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

John M. Carroll,
Thomas G. Bever and
Chava R. Pollack
John M. Carroll
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Thomas G. Bever
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Chava R. Pollack
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mental basis of linguistic intuitions is obscure, as regards their relationship both to other aspects of language behavior, such as speaking and listening, and to an hypothesized epistemological structure, such as a ‘grammar’. In the present study, we show that experimentally manipulated differences in mental state can systematically alter the linguistic intuitions which speakers render about sentences. These results indicate that the processes underlying intuitions cannot be ignored when they are used as empirical data to test grammatical theories.

‘Inner perception ... constitutes the ultimate and indispensable precondition for the other ... sources of knowledge. Consequently ... inner perception constitutes the very foundation upon which the science of psychology is erected’ (Brentano [1874] 1973:43) ... ‘If anyone were to mount a skeptical attack against this ultimate foundation of cognition, he would find no other foundation upon which to erect an edifice of knowledge. Thus, there is no need to justify our confidence in inner perception. What is clearly needed instead is a theory about the relation between such perception and its object ... such a theory is no longer possible if perception and object are separated into two distinct mental acts, of which the one would only be an effect of the other’ (ibid., 140).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1981, pp. 368 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Support was received from a Fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation awarded to the second author. Requests for reprints should be directed to the first author, whose present address is 11–105 IBM Watson Research Center. P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.

References

Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language, ed. by Hayes, John R., 279–362. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Judgments of grammaticality. Lingua 21. 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, Edwin G. 1953. A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin 50. 169–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brentano, Franz. 1973. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. New York: Humanities Press. [Originally published as Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1874.]Google Scholar
Carroll, John M. 1979. Complex compounds: Phrasal embedding in lexical structures. Linguistics 17. 863–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. Semantics, ed. by Steinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A., 183–216. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on form and interpretation. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
Clifton, Charles, and Odom, Richard. 1966. Similarity relations among certain English sentence constructions. Psychological Monographs 80, whole no. 613.Google Scholar
Duval, Shelley, and Wicklund, Robert A. 1972. A theory of objective self awareness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, George Andrew. 1971. Statistical analysis in education and psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1977. Contextual influence on acceptability judgments. Linguistics 187. 5–11.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., and Bever, Thomas G. 1976. The fall and rise of empiricism. An integrated theory of linguistic ability, ed. by Bever, Thomas et al., 11–64. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas, and Postal, Paul M. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klahr, David. 1969. A Monte Carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's non-metric scaling procedure. Psychometrika 34. 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, Joseph B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a non-metric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1971. On generative semantics. Semantics, ed. by Steinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A., 232–96. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1972. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. CLS 8. 183–228.Google Scholar
Miller, George. 1962. Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist 17. 748–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1972. The best theory. Goals of linguistic theory, ed. by Peters, Stanley, 131–70. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7. 532–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1979. Where's English? Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, ed. by Fillmore, Charles J. et al., 127–63. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Nancy J. 1973. Differences between linguists and non-linguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2. 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett, N. 1897. Dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology 9. 507–33.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A., and Padmos, P. 1971. Quantitative interpretation of stress in Kruskal's multidimensional scaling technique. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 24. 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B. 1965. Social facilitation. Science 149. 269–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed