No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2026
The present study is a small portion of a study entitled: Prefix Be- Privative in Germanic. The purpose of this study is to determine, on the basis of chronology and syntax, the development of meaning of so-called privative verbs with prefix be-.
page 9 note 1 Cf. p. 82 below.
page 11 note 2 Cf. Edward H. Sehrt, Vollständiges Wörterbuch zum Heliand und zur altsächsischen Genesis (Hesperia 14.412); Göttingen 1925.
page 15 note 1 Pitulit in the twelfth-century manuscript Clm. 22201 probably means ‘deprived’, as we shall see later. This privative meaning of OHG bitullen does not seem to have been recorded. ‘Mit einem tülle versehen’ (cf. M. Lexer 1.245 under betüllen) may easily develop into ‘debar, deprive’, as in the case of OE betynan and OE belucan. (Tülle—‘wand od. zaun von brettern od. palisaden’. Cf. M. Lexer 2.1564.)
page 17 note 1a The first r of this word appears as n in the printed text, obviously either a misprint or a scribal error.
page 17 note 2 The Æneids of Virgil, done into English verse by William Morris; New York, Longmans, Green and Company, 1910.
page 20 note 3 Cf. p. 15 above.
page 20 note 4 Cf. p. 19 above.
page 20 note 5 Cf. p. 19 above.
page 20 note 6 Cf. p. 19 above.
page 20 note 7 Cf. p. 18 above.
page 20 note 8 Cf. p. 17 above.
page 22 note 9 Wulfstan 157.19, and 243.13. Cf. p. 65 below.
page 22 note 10 Cf. p. 57 below.
page 22 note 11 Cf. pp. 60–1 below.
page 23 note 12 Cf. Wilhelm Braune, Ahd. Lesebuch (9th ed.), 1928, p. 228: felgen (falgjan) .... für sich (dat.) etwas beanspruchen.
page 24 note 13 Cf. p. 16 above.
page 25 note 14 Cf. p. 19 above.
page 25 note 15 Page 18 above.
page 25 note 16 Page 19 above.
page 25 note 17 Read frustror (so St-S ftn.).
page 25 note 18 Cf. pp. 20 and 24 above.
page 26 note 19 Cf. p. 25 above.
page 27 note 20 Page 15 above.
page 27 note 21 Page 17 above.
page 27 note 22 Page 17 above.
page 29 note 23 Cf. Heinrich Brunner, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte (2nd ed.) 1.460; Leipzig, 1906.
page 30 note 24 Cf. Jacob Grimm, Deutsche Rechtsalterthümer (4th ed.) 1. 270; Leipzig, 1899.
page 30 note 25 Page 59 below.
page 30 note 26 Cf. CGL 4.67.10, 236.18, 340.2, 441.33, 514.34–5–6, 5.421.46, 430.28, 455.7.
page 31 note 27 Read exulet (so St-S 4.26, ftn. 3).
page 31 note 28 St-S 2.23, footnote 3.
page 32 note 29 The raised s is a compendium representing er.
page 32 note 30 Abhandlungen d. bayr. Akad. I Cl. XIX Bd. II Abth. p. 391.
page 43 note 31 Oskar Schade, Altdeutsches Wörterbuch 1.463; Halle, Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses, 1872–1882.
page 43 note 32 E. G. Graff, Althochdeutscher Sprachschatz 4.126; Berlin, Nikolai, 1838.
page 43 note 33 Graff 4.126.
page 43 note 34 Graff 4.126; St-S 1.287.51, 2.91.48.
page 44 note 35 Cf. Graff 4.126; St-S 1.787.51.
page 49 note 36 Cf. Josef Schatz, Ahd. Gram. 1927 §265 p. 175.
page 49 note 37 §453a, p. 291.
page 53 note 1 All the Old English material available, both prose and poetry, as well as much of the important Middle English material, was carefully gone through for this study, and every word with prefix be- (no matter what the meaning) recorded. All dictionaries and glossaries were consulted as checks. The latest date noted in the New English Dictionary was accepted as that of the latest occurrence unless evidence to the contrary was available.
page 53 note 2 Cf. p. 28 above.
page 53 note 3 Cf. p. 22 above.
page 53 note 4 Cf. p. 21 above.
page 53 note 5 Cf. B-T Suppl. 79.
page 54 note 6 Pages 58–63 below.
page 68 note 7 Benumen relates to the past, bescired to the future as well as to the past.
page 70 note 8 Since bescerian refers to the future as well as to the past, beneoman, which refers only to the past, is added. The author of the Old English Bede wished to make sure that the full meaning of the Latin original be expressed.