Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:19:47.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repair organization in Chinantec whistled speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Mark A. Sicoli
Mark A. Sicoli*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
*
Department of Anthropology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400120, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4120 [marksicoli@virginia.edu]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how conversational repair is organized in the reduced communicative channel of whistled speech in San Pedro Sochiapam Chinantec of Oaxaca, Mexico. It argues that studies oflanguage channeled through different modalities affect our understanding of human language more generally. While repair in whistled speech shares the same universal sequence organization as repair in spoken speech, there are noteworthy differences in the preference organization and the typology of repair in whistled speech: a reduction in the types of repair initiations; a lack of preference for self-initiated repair; and an inversion of the frequency relation of OPEN and RESTRICTED repairs to favor open formats. I propose that these patterned differences are motivated by a reduced semiotic carrying capacity of the whistled channel.

Keywords

pragmaticsconversational repairwhistled speechlinguistic registermodalitiesChinantecOtomanguean

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , June 2016, pp. 411 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blythe, Joe. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Murrinh-Patha. Open Linguistics 1. 1. 283–308. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2015. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Online: http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, Anderson, Ann h., Shillcock, Richard; and Yule, George. 1983. Teaching talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen С.. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, ed. by Goody, Esther N., 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Busnel, René-Guy, and Classe, André. 1976. Whistled languages. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, John H. 1976. Four-toned announcements on Mbɔle talking gongs. In Sebeok & Umiker, 751–56.Google Scholar
Cowan, George Μ. 1948. Mazateco whistle speech. Language 24. 3. 280–86. DOI: 10.2307/410362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, George Μ. 1972. Segmental features of Tepehua whistle speech. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Montreal, 695–98.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S. 2005. Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’. Discourse Processes 39. 1. 1–43. DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Siwu. Open Linguistics 1.1.232–55. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Blythe, Joe; and Dirksmeyer, Tyko. 2014. Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology. Studies in Language 38.1.5–43. DOI: 10.1075/sl.38.1.01din.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, and Enfield, N. J.. 2015. Other-initiated repair across languages: Towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics 1.1.96–118. DOI: 10.2478/opli-2014-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Kendrick, Kobin H.; and Enfield, N. J.. 2016. A coding scheme for other-initiated repair across languages. Open Linguistics 2.1.35–46. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2016-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Roberts, Seán g., Baranova, Julija, Blythe, Joe, Drew, Paul, Floyd, Simeon, Gísladóttir, Rósa s., Kendrick, Kobin h., Levinson, Stephen С., Manrique, Elizabeth, Rossi, Giovanni; and Enfield, N. J.. 2015. Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS ONE 10.9.e0136100. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Torreira, Francisco; and Enfield, N. J.. 2013. Is ‘Huh?’ a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE 8.11.e78273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28. 69–101. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Terra. 2014. From compensation to integration: Effects of the pro-tactile movement on the sublexical structure of Tactile American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 69. 22–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Lao. Open Linguistics 1.1.119–44. DOI: 10.2478/opli-2014-0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Cha’palaa. Open Linguistics 1.1.467–89. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foris, David P. 1993. Sochiapam Chinantec grammar. Auckland: University of Auckland dissertation.Google Scholar
Foris, David P. 2000. A grammar of Sochiapam Chinantec. Dallas: SIL International and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Wouk, Fay, Hayashi, Makoto, Fincke, Steven, Tao, Liang, Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Laakso, Nimma; and Hernández, Wilfrido Flores. 2009. A cross-linguistic investigation of the site of initiation in same-turn self-repair. Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, ed. by Sidnell, Jack, 104–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerfen, Chip, and Baker, Kirk. 2005. The production and perception of laryngealized vowels in Coatzospan Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics 33. 311–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GÍsladóttir, Rósa S. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Icelandic. Open Linguistics 1.1.309–28. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior, 5–46. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Gerilee, and Zawolkow, Esther. 1993. Signing Exact English. Los Alamitos, CA: Modern Signs Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles Francis. 1987. Refurbishing our foundations: Elementary linguistics from an advanced point of view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohenberger, Annette, Happ, Daniela; and Leuninger, Helen. 2009. Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: Evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language. In Meier et al., 112–42.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. Studies in social interaction, ed. by Sudnow, David N., 294–338. New York: Macmillan/The Free Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert E., and Liddell, Scott K.. 2010. Toward a phonetic representation of signs: Sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies 11. 2. 241–74. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2010.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. 2015. Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1.1.164–90. DOI: 10.2478/opli-2014-0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. Repair. The handbook of conversation analysis, ed. by Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya, 229–56. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2005. Alternative questions used in conversational repair. Discourse Studies 7. 2. 193–211. DOI: 10.1177/1461445605050366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 2004. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language & Social Interaction 37.2.151–84. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen С. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen С. 2007. Optimizing person reference—perspectives from usage on Rossel Island. Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives, ed. by Enfield, N. J. and Stivers, Tanya, 29–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen С. 2013. Recursion in pragmatics. Language 89. 1. 149–62. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2013.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen С. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Yélî Dnye: Seeing eye-to-eye in the language of Rossel Island. Open Linguistics 1.1.386–410. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manrique, Elizabeth. 2016. Other-initiated repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open Linguistics 2.1.1–34. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2016-0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manrique, Elizabeth, and Enfield, N. J.. 2015. Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: Evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1326. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, Richard R 2009. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In Meier, et al., 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard R., Cormier, Kearsy; and Quinto-Rozos, David (eds.) 2009. Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Julien. 2008. Typology and acoustic strategies of whistled languages: Phonetic comparison and perceptual cues of whistled vowels. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38. 1. 64–90. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100308003277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Julien. 2015. Whistled languages: A worldwide inquiry on human whistled speech. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, Michael. 1977. The preference for self-correction in a Tai conversational corpus. Language 53. 4. 872–82. DOI: 10.2307/412915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, Michael. 1988. Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nketia, J. H. Kwabena. 1976. The poetry of drums. In Sebeok & Umiker, 757–64.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. (Janua Linguarum, series maior 24.) The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialland, Annie. 2005. Phonological and phonetic aspects of whistled languages. Phonology 22. 2. 237–71. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675705000552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs 73. 137–61. DOI: 10.1080/03637750600581206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Italian. Open Linguistics 1.1.256–82. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A.; and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4.696–735. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, ed. by Tannen, Deborah, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97. 5. 12951345. DOI: 10.1086/229903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Third turn repair. Towards a social science of language, vol. 2: Social interaction and discourse structures, ed. by Guy, Gregory R., Feagin, Crawford, Schiffrin, Deborah, and Baugh, John, 31–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21. 2. 20543. DOI: 10.1093/applin/21.2.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail; and Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53.2.361–82. DOI: 10.2307/413107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A., and Umiker, Donna J.. 1976. Speech surrogates: Drum and whistle systems. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2005. Otomanguean languages. Encyclopedia of linguistics, ed. by Strazny, Philipp, 797–800. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2007. Tono: A linguistic ethnography of tone and voice in a Zapotec region. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2010. Shifting voices with participant roles: Voice qualities and speech registers in Mesoamerica. Language in Society 39. 4. 521–53. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404510000436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2012. Sochiapam Chinantec Whistled Speech multimedia archive. The Language Archive. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Online: http://corpus1.mpi.nl/ds/imdi_browser?openpath=MPI1488119%23.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2015. Voice registers. The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd edn., ed. by Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E., and Schiffrin, Deborah, 105–26. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark a., Stivers, Tanya, Enfield, N. J.; and Levinson, Stephen c.. 2015. Marked initial pitch in questions signals marked communicative function. Language and Speech 58. 3. 204–23. DOI: 10.1177/0023830914529247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation analysis: An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41. 1. 31–57. DOI: 10.1080/08351810701691123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Enfield, N. J., Brown, Penelope, Englert, Cristina, Hayashi, Makoto, Heinemann, Trine, Hoymann, Gertie, Rossano, Federico, Peter, Jan Ruiter, de, Yoon, Kyung-Eun; and Levinson, Stephen С.. 2009. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106.26.10587–92. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles; and LeBaron, Curtis. 2011. Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Margaret h., Vinkhuyzen, Erik, Aoki, Paul m.; and Woodruff, Allison. 2006. Organizing a remote state of incipient talk: Push-to-talk mobile radio interaction. Language in Society 35. 3. 393–418. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404506060180.Google Scholar
Willoughby, Louisa, Manns, Howard, Shimako, Iwasaki; and Bartlett, Meredith. 2014. Misunderstanding and repair in Tactile Auslan. Sign Language Studies 14.4.41943. DOI: 10.1353/s1s.2014.0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Brugman, Hennie, Russel, Albert, Klassmann, Alex; and Sloetjes, Han. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), 1556–59. Online: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006/.Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 2006. Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes 41. 1. 67109. DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 2009. Repetition in the initiation of repair. Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, ed. by Sidnell, Jack, 31–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei. 1999. Repair in Chinese conversation. Pokfulam: University of Hong Kong dissertation.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sicoli supplementary material

Sicoli supplementary material
Download Sicoli supplementary material(File)
File 145.7 MB