Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T10:50:37.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A ‘scattered’ rule in Swiss German

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Orrin Warner Robinson
Orrin Warner Robinson*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rule of o-lowering in Swiss German, previously discussed in Kiparsky 1968, is shown both to precede and follow umlaut in some dialects, depending on the specific phonological environment involved. Although this might force one to postulate two lowering rules rather than one, some evidence is given for the unity of the rule. It is hypothesized that ‘rule simplifications’ of the type which result in spread of a rule to new items act like ‘rule additions’ in that they take place at the bottom of the phonological component. A direct counter-example from Demers 1972 is considered and dismissed. Finally, some of the formal consequences of this phenomenon for diachronic and synchronic analysis are explored.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 1976, pp. 148 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berger, Jakob. 1913. Die Laute der Mundarten des St. Galler Rheintals. (Beiträge zur schweizerdeutschen Grammatik, 3.) Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm, and Mitzka, Walther. 1967. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 12th ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Hennig. 1931. Sprachwandel und Sprachbewegungen in althochdeutscher Zeit. (Jenaer germanistische Forschungen, 18.) Jena: Verlag der Frommannschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Demers, Richard. 1972. Rule generalization in Old High German. Studia Linguistica (Lund) 26.26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderlin, Fritz, 1911. Die Mundart von Kesswil im Oberthurgau. (Beiträge zur schweizerdeutschen Grammatik, 5.) Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Franck, Johannes. 1909. Altfränkische Grammatik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Franck, Johannes. 1910. Mittelniederländische Grammatik. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Henning, Rudolf. 1874. Über die sanctgallischen Sprachdenkmäler bis zum Tode Karls des Grossen. (Quellen und Forschungen zur Sprach- und Culturgeschichte der germanischen Völker, 3.) Strassburg: Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1975. Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jutz, Leo. 1931. Die alemannischen Mundarten. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. 1973. Rule insertion. Lg. 49.551–578.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1965. Phonological change. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, E. & Harms, R. T., 170–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1971. Historical linguistics. A survey of linguistic science, ed. by Dingwall, W. O., 576–649. College Park: University of Maryland Linguistics Program.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P., 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Meinherz, Paul. 1920. Die Mundart der Bündner Herrschaft. (Beiträge zur schweizerdeutschen Grammatik, 13.) Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1961a. Zur Geschichte des deutschen Vokalsystems. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 83.1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1961b. Lautwandel durch innere Kausalität: die ostschweizerische Vokalspaltung. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 28.227–251.Google Scholar
Penzl, Herbert. 1949. Umlaut and secondary umlaut in Old High German. Lg. 25.223–240.Google Scholar
Robinson, Orrin W. 1972. Synchronic reflexes of diachronic phonological rules. (Cornell University dissertation.) Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Robinson, Orrin W. 1975. Abstract phonology and the history of umlaut. Lingua. 37.1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Josef. 1907. Altbairische Grammatik: Laut- und Flexionslehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schatz, Josef. 1927. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Stickelberger, Heinrich. 1881. Lautlehre der lebenden Mundart der Stadt Schaffhausen. Aarau: Sauerländer.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. Freeman. 1938. A note on Old High German umlaut. Monatshefte für Deutschen Unterricht 30.177–181.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1968. A syntagmatic structure in development: ‘umlaut’ and ‘consonantal influence’ in Germanic. Lingua 21.494–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1975. Generality in language change: the case of the Old High German vowel shift. Lingua 35.1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loey, A. 1964. Schönfelds historische grammatica van het Nederlands. 7th ed. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, N. 1915. De umlaut van a in Ripuaries en Salies-Frankiese dialecten van België en Nederland. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsche Taal- en Letterkunde 33.203–247.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Phonetic details in assimilation: problems in Germanic phonology. Lg. 48.863–892.Google Scholar
Wanner, Georg. 1941. Die Mundarten des Kantons Schaffhausen. (Beiträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik, 20.) Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Wiget, Wilhelm. 1916. Die Laute der Toggenburger Mundarten. (Beiträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik, 9.) Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar