Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T01:04:22.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Frantisek Lichtenberk
Frantisek Lichtenberk*
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
*
Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Oceanic languages, elements that function or used to function as directional verbs of motion—‘go’, ‘come’, and ‘return‘—undergo a variety of grammaticalization processes. This study is an investigation of the semantic aspects of those developments, the factors that motivate the functional extensions, and the relations among the meanings/functions of the etyma. It is human conceptualization of phenomena (viz. metaphor and metonymy) that directly motivates the developments. Even though the various meanings/functions of an etymon are all historically related, synchronically there need not be any property exclusively shared by all of them. The nature of the motivations for the functional extensions provides support for the view of meaning as essentially subjective and open-ended.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 475 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benveniste, Émile. 1968. Mutations of linguistic categories. Directions for historical linguistics, ed. by Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Yakov, 83–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, Bruce, Hohepa, P.; and Mead, S. M. (eds.) 1967. Selected readings in Maori. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed.Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1979. More about metaphor. In Ortony, 19–43.Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia M. 1983. Story of over. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., and Pagliuca, William. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Ramat, Anna G., Carruba, Onofrio, and Bernini, Giuliano, 109–22. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano; and Perkins, Revere D. 1988. Back to the future. Paper presented at the Symposium on Grammaticalization, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur. 1943. The linguistic position of South-Eastern Papua. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur, and Layard, J. 1980. Materials in Atchin: Grammar, vocabulary and texts. (Pacific Linguistics D-20.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1971. Directionality and paraphrase. Lg. 47.1–26.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V., and Carpenter, Kathie L. 1989. The notion of source in language acquisition. Lg. 65.1–30.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, ed. by Moore, Timothy E., 27–63. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike, and Heine, Bernd. 1986. On the metaphorical base of grammar. Studies in Language 10.297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1982. The Paamese language of Vanuatu. (Pacific Linguistics B-87.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8.181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1988. A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M. 1989. A role for inference in meaning change. Studies in Language 13.317–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, Matthew. 1989. Zabana: A grammar of a Solomon Islands language. Auckland: University of Auckland M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The past and the future: Are they coming or going? Berkeley Linguistics Society 8.322–34.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L., and Zwicky, Arnold M. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2:561–66.Google Scholar
Geraghty, Paul. 1976. Fijian prepositions. Journal of the Polynesian Society 85.507–20.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1973. The time-axis phenomenon. Lg. 49.890–925.Google Scholar
Grace, George W. 1987. The linguistic construction of reality. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) 1978. Universals of human language, vol. 3: Word structure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamel, Patricia J. 1983. Coming and going in Loniu. 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference papers, ed. by Ingemann, Frances, 61–68. Lawrence, KS: Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike; and Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1988. From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages. Paper prepared for the Symposium on Grammaticalization, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1988. Some heuristic principles of grammaticization. Paper presented at the Symposium on Grammaticalization, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
La Fontinelle, Jacqueline de. 1976. La langue de Houaïlou (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Paris: Société d'études linguistiques et anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. A view of linguistic semantics. Topics in cognitive linguistics, ed. by Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida, 49–90. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Leenhardt, Maurice. 1932. Documents néo-calédoniens. Paris: Institut d'Ethnologie, Université de Paris.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Grammaticalization in modem German. Paper presented at the Symposium on Grammaticalization, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A. 1974. Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: Verbs or prepositions? Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2.257–78.Google Scholar
Frantisek, Lichtenberg. 1985. Syntactic-category change in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 24.1–84.Google Scholar
Frantisek, Lichtenberg. 1987. Degrees of irrealis and evidentiality in To'aba'ita. Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference, ed. by DeLancey, Scott and Tomlin, Russell S., 333–55. Eugene, OR: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, John. 1975. Oral/nasal alternation and the realis/irrealis distinction in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 14.87–99.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, G. B. 1972. Fijian grammar. Suva, Fiji: Government Press.Google Scholar
Money, Lucy. 1975. Babatana language. Sasamungga, Choiseul Island, Solomon Islands, ms, ca. 1975.Google Scholar
Moore, Terence, and Carlino, Christine. 1982. Understanding language: Towards a post-Chomskyan linguistics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norvig, Peter, and Lakoff, George. 1987. Taking: A study in lexical network theory. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13.195–206.Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew, (ed.) 1979. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paton, W. F. 1971a. Ambrym (Lonwolwol) grammar. (Pacific Linguistics B-19.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Paton, W. F. 1971b. Tales of Ambrym. (Pacific Linguistics D-10.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Paton, W. F. 1973. Ambrym (Lonwolwol) dictionary. (Pacific Linguistics C-21.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Persson, Gunnar. 1988. Homonymy, polysemy and heterosemy: The types of lexical ambiguity in English. Symposium on Lexicography III: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Lexicography, May 14–16, 1986, at the University of Copenhagen, ed. by Hyldgaard-Jensen, Karl and Zettersten, Arne, 269–80. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, 284–324.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On monosemy: A study in linguistic semantics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, Albert J. 1985. The Fijian language. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison in universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1978. On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Greenberg, 369–400.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Lg. 65.31–55.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and König, Ekkerhard. 1988. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. Paper presented at the Symposium on Grammaticalization, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Tryon, D. T. 1986. Stem-initial consonant alternation in the languages of Epi, Vanuatu: A case of assimilation? FOCAL II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Geraghty, Paul, Carrington, Lois, and Wurm, S. A., 239–58. (Pacific Linguistics C-94.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell. 1978. The nature of future tenses. In Greenberg, 83–123.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wivell, Richard. 1981. Kairiru lexicon. (Working Papers in Anthropology, Archaeology, Linguistics, Maori Studies, No. 59.) Auckland: Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland.Google Scholar