Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:31:04.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic Interpretation Vs. Lexical Governance: Clitic Climbing in Italian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Donna Jo Napoli
Donna Jo Napoli*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The syntactic rule of Restructuring explains the syntactic properties of so-called ‘Clitic Climbing’ sentences in Italian. However, Restructuring alone fails to account for the semantic properties of such sentences. This paper argues that lexical governance of Restructuring is inadequate. Instead, a syntactic rule operating freely whenever its structural description is met, and followed by semantic interpretation rules, not only adequately but insightfully handles the data. A crucial claim is that the derived structure of the verbal complex in a restructured sentence is identical to that of a complex of auxiliary + past participle, so that the same semantic interpretation rules apply to both.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 841 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aissen, Judith. 1974a. Verb raising. LI 5.325–66.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1974b. The syntax of causative constructions. Harvard dissertation.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith, and Perlmutter, David. 1976. Clause reduction in Spanish. BLS 2.1–30.Google Scholar
Alvaro, Corrado. 1945. Gente in Aspromonte. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
Andersson, Lars-Gunnar. 1975. Form and function in subordinate clauses. (Gothenburg monographs in linguistics, 1.) Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
Araya, Guillermo, et al. 1980 (eds.) Los clíticos en el español actual. (Diálogos hispánicos de Amsterdam, 1.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Beniak, Edouard, Mougeon, Raymond; and Canale, Michael, MS. Work on the complements of motion verbs in Ontarian Quebec French. Toronto: Center of Franco-Ontarian Studies, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den. 1975. A note on designing lexical delenda. MS, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. 1969. Decamerone. Ed. by Consoli, Domenico. Milano: Bietti.Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke, and Croughs-Hageman, Ans. 1980. La súbsida de los clíticos en castellano. In Araya et al., 63–92.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1976. Gradience in entailment. Language Sciences 41.1–13.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. The go progressive and auxiliary formation, MS, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Bordelois, Ivonne. 1974. The grammar of Spanish causative complements. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Bordelois, Ivonne. 1976. On traces of specified subject in Romance languages. Green ideas blown up, ed. by Riemsdijk, Henk van, 29–43. Amsterdam: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bordelois, Ivonne. 1978. Animacy or subjecthood: Clitic movement and Romance causatives. In Suñer, 18–40.Google Scholar
Bordelois, Ivonne. 1980. Hacia una gramática universal: Clíticos romances y la condició n de frontera. In Araya et al., 51–62.Google Scholar
Borkin, Ann. 1973. To be and not to be. CLS 9.44–56.Google Scholar
Borkin, Ann. 1974. Raising to object position: A study in the syntax and semantics of clause merging. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar
Borkin, Ann. 1979. What are clefts good for? MS, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Calvino, Italo. 1959. I racconti. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Anderson, Stephen & Kiparsky, Paul, 232–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2.303–51.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On binding. LI 11.1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. LI 8.425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1974. Mica, MS, University of Padova.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1975. On the cyclicity of V-raising. MS, University of Padova.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. Towards a unified treatment of island constraints. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress of Linguistics, Vienna.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, and Morgan, Jerry. 1975 (eds.) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Dalgish, Gerard. 1979. The syntax and semantics of the morpheme ni in Kivunjo (Chaga). Studies in African Linguistics 10.47–64.Google Scholar
Defoe, Daniel. 1976. Moll Flanders. Translated by G. Trevignani. Milan. [Cited in Lo Cascio.]Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold. 1975. The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1972. On the interplay of prosodic and non-prosodic means of functional sentence perspective. The Prague School of linguistics and language teaching, ed. by Fried, Vilém, 77–94. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Fornaciari, Raffaello. 1909. Grammatica italiana nell'uso moderno. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Givó n, Talmy. 1969. Studies in ChiBemba and Bantu grammar. (Studies in African linguistics, Supplement 3.) Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics and African Studies Center, UCLA.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia. 1976. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses. Lg. 52.382–97.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole & Morgan, 41–58.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1978. The grammar of PP extraposition, MS, University of Paris, Vincennes.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1980. On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. LI 11.637–78.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1975. Gaps in grammar and culture. Linguistics and anthropology in honor of C. F. Voegelin, 295–317. Ed. by Kinkade, M. Dale et al. Lisse: de Ridder.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1975. On assertive predicates. Syntax and semantics 4, ed. by Kimball, John, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kimball, John, and Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. LI 4.465–98.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1978. Some aspects of negation. Universals of human language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph et al., 127–210. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry, and Zimmer, Karl. 1976. Embedded topic in French. Subject and topic, ed. by Li, Charles, 189–212. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in a generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jovine, Francesco. 1973. Le terre del sacramento. Torino: Einaudi. [First published in 1950.]Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Lg. 47.340–58.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri, and Peters, Stanley. 1977. Requiem for presupposition. BLS 3.360–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1974. Movement rules in functional perspective. Lg. 50.630–64.Google Scholar
Larkin, Donald, MS. Implicature strategies and grammatical form: The case of say complementation in Tamil and English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, dissertation in progress.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra. 1973. Serial verb constructions in Mandarin Chinese: Subordination or coördination? You take the high node and I'll take the low node, 96–103. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Lindholm, James. 1975. The constraints of grammar, the perception of the relations between sequential events, and speaker strategies, MS, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, Vincenzo. 1970. Strutture pronominali e verbali italiane. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, Vincenzo, and Napoli, Donna Jo. 1979. Modal da with avere. Journal of Italian Linguistics 1.203–28.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol. 1976. Evidence for syntactic re-analysis: From verb to complementizer in Kwa. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, 179–91. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Luján, Marta. 1977. Conditions on transformations, trace theory, and clitic movement in Spanish. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Luján, Marta. 1978. Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 10.103–90. [Also in Linguistics 18.381–484, 1980.]Google Scholar
McCray, Alexa. 1977. An examination of the verbs which allow subject-to-subject raising, MS, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
McCray, Alexa. 1980. The semantics of backward anaphora. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa 9.329–43.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1979. The structure of auxiliary verbs in French, MS, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles, and St.-Amour, Marielle. 1977. Description historique des constructions infinitives du français. Recherches Linguistiques à Montréal 9.113–52.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1973. The two si's of Italian. Harvard dissertation. [Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.]Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1974a. Una breve analisi dei verbi modali potere e dovere. Fenomeni morphologici e sintattici nell'italiano contemporaneo, ed. by Medici, Mario & Sangregorio, Antonella, 233–40. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1974b. The no-crossing filter. CLS 10.482–91.Google Scholar
Neussel, Frank Jr. 1980 (ed.) Contemporary studies in Romance languages. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1975. English aspectual verbs. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzeschi, Aldo. 1966. La perfezione. La prosa dal Carducci ai contemporanei, ed. by Getto, Giovanni & Portinari, Folco, 215–20. Torino: Petrini.Google Scholar
Parise, Goffredo. 1974. Il prete bello. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Pirandello, Luigi. 1965. Maschere nude, I—II. Verona: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Pratolini, Vasco. 1960. Metello. Verona: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Puglielli, Annarita. 1970. Strutture sintattiche del predicato in italiano. Bari: Adriatica.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1977. Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Lg. 53.741–89.Google Scholar
Quicoli, Carlos. 1976. Conditions on clitic-movement in Portuguese. Linguistic Analysis 2.199–223.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1975. On the nature of clitic promotion in Italian, MS, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1976. Constraints on clitic promotion in Italian, MS, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1977a. Italian syntax: Transformational and relational grammar. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1977b. Trace theory, specified subject condition, and clitic climbing in Romance. MS, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1973. Is there a rule of subject-to-object raising in German? CLS 9.519–29.Google Scholar
Rivas, Alberto. 1974. Verb adjunction in Spanish, MS, MIT.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1976. Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1.1–54.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1978. A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. Recent transformational studies in European languages, ed. by Keyser, Samuel J. (LI monograph 3), 113–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roldán, Mercedes. 1974. Constraints on clitic insertion in Spanish. Linguistic studies in Romance languages, ed. by Campbell, Joe et al., 124–38. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Roldán, Mercedes. 1975. Clitic climbing and related matters. LI 6.342–6.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1975. Clausematiness. Formal semantics of natural language, ed. by Keenan, Edward, 422–75. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Saltarelli, Mario. 1978. Sentential clitics and clause reduction in Italian. In Suñer, 279–301.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1978. English propredicates. Linguistic Analysis 4.187–224.Google Scholar
Schmerling, Susan. 1975. Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In Cole & Morgan, 211–31.Google Scholar
Schroten, Jan. 1980. Sobre la sintaxis de los pronombres átonos del español. In Araya et al., 1–34.Google Scholar
Shnukal, Anna. 1980. Syntactic indications of tentativeness in discourse. In Neussel, 280–99.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1978 (ed.) Contemporary studies in Romance linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1980. Clitic promotion in Spanish revisited. In Neussel, 300–330.Google Scholar
van Tiel-Di Maio, M. Francesca. 1975. Una proposta per la sintassi dell' italiano: V-raising. MS, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Villa, Giovanni. 1964. La nausea media. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Zingarelli, Nicola. 1970. Vocabolario della lingua italiana. 10th ed. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar