Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:58:06.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tonal Alignment is Contrastive in Falling Contours in Dinka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Bert Remijsen
Bert Remijsen*
Affiliation:
The University of Edinburgh
*
b.remijsen@ed.ac.uk
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates a contrast in tonal alignment that involves falling contours in Dinka. This contrast calls into question the assumption that tonal alignment cannot distinguish contour tones of the same shape within the syllable domain (e.g. Odden 1995). A qualitative description and a small-scale perception study are followed by a detailed production study. The results indicate that the main correlate of the contrast is indeed tonal alignment: the early-aligned fall sets in during the onset or early in the vowel; the late-aligned fall sets in well into the vowel. The production study also suggests that it is unlikely for more than two patterns of alignment in contour tones of the same shape to be accurately produced and perceived, given various phonetic limitations. The contrast is represented phonologically using a binary feature. This representation is adequate in an explanatory sense, in that the category boundary is in line with the quantal threshold hypothesized in House 1990. The results also corroborate the hypothesis of three-level vowel length in Dinka.

Keywords

tonal alignment, contour tonestone featuresvowel lengthpitch perceptiontime pressureDinka

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , June 2013, pp. 297 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akinlabi, Akin, and Liberman, Mark. 2001. Tonal complexes and tonal alignment. North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 31. 1–20.Google Scholar
Andersen, Torben. 1987. The phonemic system of Agar Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 9. 1–27.10.1515/jall.1987.9.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Torben. 1993. Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection. Phonology 10. 1–42.10.1017/S095267570000172XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas. 2005. Fitting linear mixed models in R—Using the lme4 package. R News 5. 1. 27–30.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., and Pierrehumbert, Janet B.. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3. 255–309.10.1017/S095267570000066XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, Sheila E., and Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1980. Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67. 648–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2010. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.1.43. Online: http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta. 1977. Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. (Travaux de l'institut de linguistique de Lund 12.) Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Caspers, Johanneke, and van Heuven, Vincent J.. 1993. Effects of time pressure on the phonetic realization of the Dutch accent-lending pitch rise and fall. Phonetica 50. 161. 71.10.1159/000261936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Imperio, Mariapaola, and House, David. 1997. Perception of questions and statements in Neapolitan Italian. Proceedings of Eurospeech 1997, Rhodes, Greece, 251–54.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 1994. Against contour tone units. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 4. 555–608.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A., and Esling, John H.. 2006. The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register and stress. Phonology 23. 157–93.10.1017/S095267570600087XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, Kathryn. 2007. Templatic morphology and indexed markedness constraints. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 4. 749–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, Sónia. 2002. Tonal association and target alignment in European Portuguese nuclear falls. Laboratory phonology 7, ed. by Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha, 387–418. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, Jack. 1983. Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics 11. 149–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Raymond G. (ed.) 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 15th edn. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Steven, and Zee, Eric. 1979. On the perception of contour tones. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 45. 150–64.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 2. 253–306.Google Scholar
Ho, Aichen T. 1976. The acoustic variation of Mandarin tones. Phonetica 33. 353–67.10.1159/000259792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, David. 1990. Tonal perception in speech. (Travaux de l'institut de linguistique de Lund 24.) Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
House, David. 1996. Differential perception of tonal contours through the syllable. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), Philadelphia, 2048–51.Google Scholar
House, David. 2004. Pitch and alignment in the perception of tone and intonation. From traditional phonology to modern speech processing, ed. by Fant, Gunnar, Fujisaki, Hiroya, Cao, Jianfen, and Xu, Yi, 189–204. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Hermes, Dik J., and van Gestel, Joost C.. 1991. The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90. 97–102.10.1121/1.402397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyman, Larry M. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110854794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2010. How to study a tone language, with exemplification from Oku (Grassfields Bantu, Cameroon). UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2010, 179–209.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.10.1017/S0952675700000397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1983. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language 59. 4. 72159.10.2307/413371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morén, Bruce, and Zsiga, Elizabeth. 2006. The lexical and post-lexical phonology of Thai tones. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24. 113–78.10.1007/s11049-004-5454-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2003. F0 timing in Kinyarwanda. Phonetica 60. 71–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nàbělek, Igor V., Nàbělek;, Anna K. and Hirsh, Ira J.. 1970. Pitch of tone bursts of changing frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 48. 536–53.10.1121/1.1912169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, Francis. 2003. Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, 771–74.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1995. Tone: African languages. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Goldsmith, John A., 444–75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 2011. The representation of vowel length. The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. by van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 465–90. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1989. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. Language change—Contributions to the study of its causes (Trends in linguistics 43), ed. by Breivik, Leiv E. and Jahr, Ernst H., 173–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pfordresher, Peter Q., and Brown, Steven. 2009. Enhanced production and perception of musical pitch in tone language speakers. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71. 1385–98.10.3758/APP.71.6.1385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Beckman, Mary E.. 1988. Japanese tone structure. (Linguistic inquiry monograph 15.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, D’Imperio, Mariapaola; and Fivela, Barbara Gili. 2005. Pitch accent alignment in Romance: Primary and secondary associations with metrical structure. Language and Speech 48. 359–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, and Gilley, Leoma. 2008. Why are three-level vowel length systems rare? Insights from Dinka (Luanyjang dialect). Journal of Phonetics 36. 318–44.10.1016/j.wocn.2007.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, and Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. The tone system of the Luanyjang dialect of Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 29. 2. 149–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, and Manyang, Caguor A.. 2009. Luanyjang Dinka. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39. 1. 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roettger, Larry, and Roettger, Lisa. 1989. A Dinka dialect study. Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 6. 1–64.Google Scholar
Rossi, Mario. 1971. Le seuil de glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour les sons de la parole. Phonetica 23. 1–33.10.1159/000259328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepman, Astrid, Lickley, Robin; and Ladd, D. Robert. 2006. Effects of vowel length and ‘right context’ on the alignment of Dutch nuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics 34. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 1997. Tone sandhi in Comaltepec Chinantec. Language 73. 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics 17. 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., and Keyser, Samuel J.. 2010. Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap. Journal of Phonetics 38. 10–19.10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
't Hart, Johan, René, Collier; and Cohen, Antonie. 1990. A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, Jo. 1994. The discrimination of pitch movement alignment in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 22. 65–85.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30267-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Yi. 1998. Consistency of tone-syllable alignment across different syllable structures and speaking rates. Phonetica 55. 179–203.10.1159/000028432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Yi. 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27. 55–105.10.1006/jpho.1999.0086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Yi. 2001. Fundamental frequency peak delay in Mandarin. Phonetica 58. 26–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Yi, and Sun, Xuejing. 2002. Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111. 1399–413.10.1121/1.1445789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Kristine Μ. 2008. The prosody of second position clitics and focus in Zagreb Croatian. The prosody of second position clitics and focus in Zagreb Croatian: University of California, Los Angeles master's thesis. Online: http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/general/matheses/Yu_UCLA_MA_2008.pdf.10.1121/1.2933825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jie. 2001. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution—Typological survey and formal analysis. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie. 2002. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution: Typological survey and formal analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Remijsen supplementary material

Remijsen supplementary material
Download Remijsen supplementary material(File)
File 1.3 MB