Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:16:58.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vowel Features, Paired Variables, and the English Vowel Shift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

William S-Y. Wang
William S-Y. Wang*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study the use of variables for the abbreviation of disjunctive sets of phonological rules is examined. We ask whether there are rule sets which require more than one variable, and answer the question in the affirmative. The evidence consists of a new formulation of the English vowel-shift rule, using a pair of asymmetric features which distinguish four tongue heights for vowels. Within the context of the proposed rule, several theoretical issues concerning rule formalism and phonological change are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1968, pp. 695 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chafe, Wallace L. 1968. The ordering of phonological rules. IJAL 34.115–136.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. 1934. The non-uniqueness of phonemic solutions of phonetic systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 4.363–397.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ege, Niels. 1965. The Danish vowel system. Gengo Kenkyu 47.21–35. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962a. A descriptive convention for treating assimilation and dissimilation. MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, Quarterly Progress Report 66.295–296.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962b. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18.54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPA. 1949. The principles of the International Phonetic Association. London.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar; and Halle, Morris. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (6th printing, 1965.)Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1907. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part I, Sounds and spellings. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. Douglas. 1968. The formal structure of phonological descriptions. University of California doctoral dissertation, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1965. On the nature of syntactic irregularity. Harvard University Computation Laboratory, report no. NSF-16.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1968. Aspects of phonological theory. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Robertson, Stuart, and Cassidy, Frederic G.. 1954. The development of modern English. 2d ed. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stanley, Richard. 1968. The formal character of redundancy rules in phonology. Berkeley, Project on Linguistic Analysis Reports (2d series), 6. (A revised version of his Redundancy rules in phonology, Lg. 43.393–436, 1967.)Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. 1966. Problems in the interpretation of the great English vowel shift. ms.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1967a. Phonological features of tone. IJAL 33.93–105.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1967b. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Berkeley, Project on Linguistic Analysis Reports (2d series), 2. (To appear in Lg. 45:1.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1968. The basis of speech. Berkeley, Project on Linguistics Analysis Reports (2d series), 4. (To be published by Prentice-Hall .)Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y., and Fillmore, Charles J.. 1961. Intrinsic cues and consonant perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 4.180–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmer, Karl. 1969. On the psychological correlates of some Turkish morpheme structure conditions. (To appear in Lg. 45:2.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar