Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T04:05:47.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agreement and anti-agreement

Review products

Agreement and anti-agreement: A syntax of Luiseño. By SusanSteele. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990. Pp. xi, 446.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Steven G. Lapointe
Steven G. Lapointe*
Affiliation:
University of California at Davis
*
Department of Linguistics, 922 Sproul Hall, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616-8685 [sglapointe@ucdavis.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Reviews
Information
Language , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 372 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akmajian, Adrian, Steele, Susan; and Wasow, Thomas. 1979. The category AUX in universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 1–64.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Mchombo, Sam. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language 63. 741–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1983. Marking constituents. Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, ed. by Heny, Frank and Richards, Barry, 69–98. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1981. On the position of Walbiri in a typology of the base. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2. 39–76.Google Scholar