No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Assessing Scholarship in Documentary Linguistics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2026
Abstract
Documentary linguistics is new and distinctive enough that some linguists and other participants in academic reviews may be uncertain about how to assess its outputs. We recommend specific strategies for assessing documentary linguistic scholarship in academic review contexts, based on a brief description of the field for the benefit of colleagues in other areas.
Information
- Type
- Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2022 Printed with the permission of Andrew Garrett & Alice C. Harris © 2022.
Footnotes
*
For helpful comments on a draft of this paper we thank Christine Beier, Andrea Berez-Kroeker, Sandra Chung, Andries Coetzee, Colleen M. Fitzgerald, Larry M. Hyman, Sharon Inkelas, Edwin Ko, Raksit T. Lau-Preechathammarach, Brook Lillehaugen, Marianne Mithun, Julia Nee, Catherine O'Connor, Zachary O'Hagan, Hannah Sande, Amalia Skilton, Tony Woodbury, and two anonymous Language referees.
References
Aissen, Judith. 1997. On the syntax of obviation. Language 73. 705–50. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1997.0042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperin, Juan Pablo, Nieves, Carol Muñoz, Schimanski, Lesley A., Fisch man, Gustavo E., Niles, Meredith T.; and McKiernan, Erin C.. 2019. Meta-research: How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? eLife 8:e42254. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.42254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperin, Juan Pablo, Schimanski, Lesley A., La, Michelle, Niles, Meredith T.; and McKiernan, Erin C.. 2020. The value of data and other non-traditional scholarly outputs in academic review, promotion, and tenure in Canada and the United States. The open handbook of linguistic data management and archiving, ed. by Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., McDonnell, Bradley, Koller, Eve, and Collister, Lauren B., 171–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0017.Google Scholar
American Historical Association. 2015. Guidelines for the professional evaluation of digital scholarship by historians. Online: https://www.historians.org/teaching-and-learning/digital-history-resources/evaluation-of-digital-scholarship-in-history/guidelines-for-the-professional-evaluation-of-digital-scholarship-by-historians.Google Scholar
Andreassen, Helene N., Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Collister, Lauren, Conzett, Philipp, Cox, Christopher, De Smedtt, Koenraad, McDonnell;, Bradley and the Research Data Alliance Linguistic Data Interest Group. 2019. Tromsø recommendations for citation of research data in linguistics. DOI: 10.15497/rda00040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 2016. Language documentation 20 years on. Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, ed. by Filipović, Luna and Pütz, Martin, 147–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Daryl, Costa, David J.; and Troy, Douglas. 2016. Myaamiaataweenki eekincikoonihkiinki eeyoonki aapisaataweenki: A Miami language digital tool for language reclamation. Language Documentation & Conservation 10. 394–410. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24713.Google Scholar
Beier, Christine (ed.) 2019. Nombres de aves comunes en ikíitu kuwasíini el idioma iquito. San Antonio de Pintuyacu: Centro del Idioma Ikíitu. Online: http://www.cabeceras.org/ikiitu_nombres-de-aves_2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. 2004. First farmers: The origins of agricultural societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L. 2019. Directional reference in discourse and narrative: Comparing indigenous and non-indigenous genres in Ahtna. Language and toponymy in Alaska and beyond: Papers in honor of James Kari (LD&C special publication 17), ed. by Holton, Gary and Thornton, Thomas F., 75–95. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24842.Google Scholar
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Gawne, Lauren, Kung, Susan Smythe, Kelly, Barbara F., Heston, Tyler, Holton, Gary, Pulsifer, Peter, Beaver, David I., Chelliah, Shobhana, Dubinsky, Stanley; et al. 2018. Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics 56. 1–18. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2017-0032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Steven, and Simons, Gary. 2003. Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description. Language 79. 557–82. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2003.0149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, Heather, Genee, Inge, Junker, Marie-Odile; and O'Donnell, Daniel Paul. 2020. ‘Credit where credit is due’: Authorship and attribution in Algonquian language digital resources. IDEAH 1(1). DOI: 10.21428/f1f23564.3d64b2ed.Google Scholar
Bodji, Sylvain, and Sande, Hannah. 2013–2015. Guébie fieldwork collection. Catalog #2014-15, California Language Archive, Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley. DOI: 10.7297/X208639V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron, Guzmán, Moisés García, Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle, Lopez, Felipe H., Plumb, May Helena; and Zarafonetis, Mike. 2020. Ticha: Collaboration with Indigenous communities to build digital resources on Zapotec language and history. Digital Humanities Quarterly 14(4). Online: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/4/000529/000529.html.Google Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela. 2017. Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) language description and documentation: A guide to the deposited collection and associated materials. Language Documentation & Conservation 11. 224–55. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24734.Google Scholar
Cámara-Leret, Rodrigo, and Bascompte, Jordi. 2021. Language extinction triggers the loss of unique medicinal knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(24):e2103683118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2103683118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Changfoot, Nadine, Andrée, Peter, Levkoe, Charles Z., Nilson, Michelle; and Goemans, Magdalene. 2020. Engaged scholarship in tenure and promotion: Autoethnographic insights from the fault lines of a shifting landscape. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 26. 239–63. DOI: 10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaparro Gardea, Rosa Isela, Holguín, Sebastián Fuentes, Loya, Bertha Fuentes, Moreno, Guillermina Fuentes, Palma, Giltro Fuentes, Ramírez, Luz Elena León, Caballero, Gabriela; and Carroll, Lucien. 2011–2018. Materials of the Choguita Rarámuri Language Project. Catalog #2019-01, California Language Archive, Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley. DOI: 10.7297/X2HH6H70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. 2001. Indigenous articulations. The Contemporary Pacific 13. 468–90. DOI: 10.1353/cp.2001.0046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
College Art Association and the Society of Architectural Historians. 2016. Guidelines for the evaluation of digital scholarship in art and architectural history. Online: https://www.collegeart.org/pdf/evaluating-digital-scholarship-in-art-and-architectural-history.pdf.Google Scholar
Cruz Cruz, Emiliana (ed.) 2020. Reflexiones teóricas en torno a la función del trabajo de campo en lingüística-antropológica: Contribuciones de investigadores indígenas del sur de México. (LD&C special publication 22.) Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/69951.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne. 2009. Psycholinguistics in our time. Inside psychology: A science over 50 years, ed. by Rabbitt, Pat, 91–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2009. Research models, community engagement, and linguistic fieldwork: Reflections on working within Canadian Indigenous communities. Language Documentation & Conservation 3. 15–50. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4423.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa, Daniels, Xway'Waat Deanna, Kulchyski, Tim, Paul, Andrew, Thom, Brian, Twance, S. Marlo; and Urbanczyk, Suzanne C.. 2018. Consultation, relationship and results in community-based language research. Insights from practices in community-based research, ed. by Bischoff, Shannon T. and Jany, Carmen, 66–93. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110527018-004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duthie, David. 2001. Globalization threat to world's cultural, linguistic and biological diversity. United Nations Environment Programme news release, February 8, 2001. Reprinted by the Foundation for Endangered Languages. Online: http://www.ogmios.org/ogmios_files/163.htm.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience L., Webster, Anthony K.; and Woodbury, Anthony C.. 2017. A holistic humanities of speaking: Franz Boas and the continuing centrality of texts. International Journal of American Linguistics 83. 41–78. DOI: 10.1086/689547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Colleen M. 2021. A framework for Language Revitalization and Documentation. Language 97.e1–e11. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2021.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florey, Margaret. 2018. Transforming the landscape of language revitalization work in Australia: The documenting and revitalising Indigenous languages training model. Insights from practices in community-based research, ed. by Bischoff, Shannon T. and Online: https://jces.ua.edu/articles/425.Google Scholar
Foster, Kevin Michael. 2010. Taking a stand: Community-engaged scholarship on the tenure track. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 3. 20–30. DOI: 10.54656/GTHV1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franjieh, Michael. 2019. The languages of northern Ambrym, Vanuatu: A guide to the deposited materials in ELAR. Language Documentation & Conservation 13. 83–111. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24849.Google Scholar
Gaby, Alice, and Woods, Lesley. 2020. Toward linguistic justice for Indigenous people: A response to Charity Hudley, Mallinson, and Bucholtz. Language 96.e268–e280. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Guzmán, Moisés. 2020. Conversatorios on Colonial Zapotec. Global SL Blog, August 14, 2020. Online: https://compact.org/2020-conversatorios-on-colonial-zapotec/.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren. 2018. A guide to the Syuba (Kagate) language documentation corpus. Language Documentation & Conservation 12. 204–34. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24768.Google Scholar
Genee, Inge, and Junker, Marie-Odile. 2018. The Blackfoot Language Resources and Digital Dictionary project: Creating integrated web resources for language documentation and revitalization. Language Documentation & Conservation 12. 274–314. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24770.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D., Drummond, Alexei J.; and Greenhill, Simon J.. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323. 479–83. DOI: 10.1126/science.1166858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, Alice C., Hyman, Larry M.; and Staros, James V.. 2006. What is reproducibility? Linguistic Typology 10. 69–73.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C., Jaeger, Florian; and Norcliffe, Elisabeth (eds.) 2015. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (Special issue: Laboratory in the field: Advances in cross-linguistic psycholinguistics) 30(9). Online: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/plcp21/30/9.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1980. Nunggubuyu myths and ethnographic texts. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2001. Proto-Uto-Aztecan: A community of cultivators in central Mexico? American Anthropologist 103. 913–34. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2001.103.4.913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2011. Subgrouping in Uto-Aztecan. Language Dynamics and Change 1. 241–78. DOI: 10.1163/221058212X643978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H., and Merrill, William L.. 2017. Uto-Aztecan maize agriculture: A linguistic puzzle from southern California. Anthropological Linguistics 59. 1–23. DOI: 10.1353/anl.2017.0000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36. 161–95. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2012. Linguistic data types and the interface between language documentation and description. Language Documentation & Conservation 6. 187–207. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4503.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, and Hale, Ken (eds.) 2001. The green book of language revitalization in practice. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KadagiƷe, Davit, and KadagiƷe, Nik'o. 1984. C'ova-tušur-kartul-rusuli leksik'oni [Tsova-Tush-Georgian-Russian dictionary]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Kakkaba, Amina (Yaka), with Garba, Abubakar and Gimba, Alhaji Maina. 2000. Dindi Bo Pikka ko gama Yaka [‘Tales in Bole’ by Yaka]. Potiskum: Fika Development Association (FIDA).Google Scholar
Kemp, Charles, Xu, Yang; and Regier, Terry. 2018. Semantic typology and efficient communication. Annual Review of Linguistics 4. 109–28. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, Margaret. 2019. Indigenous evaluation frameworks: Can the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage be a guide for recognizing Indigenous scholarship within tenure and promotion standards? AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 15. 299–308. DOI: 10.1177/1177180119887185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Michael. 1992. The world's languages in crisis. Language 68. 4–10. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1992.0052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laroche, Emmanuel, Košak, Silvin, Müller, Gertrid G. W., Görke, S.; and Steitler, Ch.. 2020. Catalogue of Hittite texts. Online: https://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/CTH/index_en.php.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2017. Producing language reclamation by decolonising ‘language’. Language Documentation and Description 14. 15–36. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/150.Google Scholar
Lima, Suzi. 2020. The Kawaiwete pedagogical grammar: Linguistic theory, collaborative language documentation, and the production of pedagogical materials. Collaborative approaches to the challenges of language documentation and conservation: Selected papers from the 2018 Symposium on American Indian Languages (SAIL) (LD&C special publication 20), ed. by de, Wilson Silva, Lima and Riestenberg, Katherine J., 54–72. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24932.Google Scholar
Linguistic Society of America. 2011. Resolution recognizing the scholarly merit of language documentation. Online: https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/resolution-recognizing-scholarly-merit-language-documentation.Google Scholar
Linguistic Society of America Executive Committee. 2018. Statement on evaluation of language documentation for hiring, tenure, and promotion. Online: https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/statement-evaluation-language-documentation-hiring-tenure-and-promotion.Google Scholar
Linguistic Society of America Executive Committee. 2021. Statement on the scholarly merit and evaluation of open scholarship in linguistics. Online: https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/statement-scholarly-merit-and-evaluation-open-scholarship-linguistics.Google Scholar
Lokyitsang, Dawa. 2017. Are Tibetans Indigenous? Lhakar Diaries, December 27, 2017. Online: https://lhakardiaries.com/2017/12/27/are-tibetans-indigenous/.Google Scholar
Lopez, Felipe H. 2020. Recovering knowledge through forgotten words/Ryien xtenënen ra ni nanën steiby quën ra dizh ni mnity. Global SL Blog, July 17, 2020. Online: https://compact.org/recovering-knowledge-through-forgotten-words/.Google Scholar
Marrison, G. E. 1975. The early Cham language, and its relationship to Malay. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 48. 52–59. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41492110.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Bradley, Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L.; and Holton, Gary (eds.) 2018. Reflections on language documentation 20 years after Himmelman 1998. (LD&C special publication 15.) Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/61710.Google Scholar
Montoya, Ignacio L., Harry, Debra; and Burns, Jennie. 2020. A collaborative development of workshops for teachers of Great Basin languages using principles of decolonization and language reclamation. Language Documentation & Conservation 14. 462–87. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24927.Google Scholar
Muhammad-Bande, Tijjani. 2019. Statement by H. E. Tijjani Muhammad Bande, President of the 74th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, December 17, 2019. Online: https://www.un.org/pga/74/2019/12/17/high-level-event-to-mark-the-end-of-the-international-year-of-indigenous-languages/.Google Scholar
Naser, Angelo, Jenks, Peter, Sande, Hannah, Ewert, Marcus, Kim, Juwon; and Monsereenusorn, Matyas. n.d. Moro story corpus. Online: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/moro/#/.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oez, Mikael. 2018. A guide to the documentation of the Beth Qustan dialect of the Central Neo-Aramaic language Turoyo. Language Documentation & Conservation 12. 339–58. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24773.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1999. Chasing rainbows: Implications of the rapid dispersal of Austronesian languages for subgrouping and reconstruction. Selected papers from the 8th International Conference in Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Zeitoun, Elizabeth and Li, Paul J.-K., 95–138. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, and Green, Roger C.. 1984. The Proto-Oceanic language community. The Journal of Pacific History 19. 123–46. DOI: 10.1080/00223348408572489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Báez, Gabriela. 2016. The interdisciplinary documentation of the flora of La Ventosa and associated lexicon and knowledge: A pilot for the National Ethnobotanical Herbarium online. Taxon: International Journal of Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Evolution 65. 425–26. DOI: 10.12705/652.59.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Ramstad, Kristina, Nelson, M. J., Paine, G., Beech, D., Paul, A., Paul, P., Allendorf, F. W.; and Daugherty, C. H.. 2007. Species and cultural conservation in New Zealand: Maori traditional ecological knowledge of tuatara. Conservation Biology 21. 455–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00620.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehg, Kenneth L., and Campbell, Lyle (eds.) 2018. The Oxford handbook of endangered languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2006. Ethical issues in linguistic fieldwork: An overview. Journal of Academic Ethics 4. 123–55. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-006-9016-2.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2010. The linguist's responsibilities to the community of speakers: Community-based research. Language documentation: Practice and values, ed. by Grenoble, Lenore A. and Furbee, N. Louanna, 25–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2011. Ethical issues in linguistic fieldwork. The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork, ed. by Thieberger, Nicholas, 407–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0019.Google Scholar
Riehl, Anastasia. 2019. Why are languages worth preserving? Sapiens, November 8, 2019. Online: https://www.sapiens.org/language/endangered-languages/.Google Scholar
Rowell, Lonnie L., Bruce, Catherine D., Shosh, Joseph M.; and Riel, Margaret M. (eds.) 2017. The Palgrave international handbook of action research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salffner, Sophie. 2015. A guide to the Ikaan language and culture documentation. Language Documentation & Conservation 9. 237–67. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24639.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Kendrick, Kobin H., Norcliffe, Elisabeth; and Majid, Asifa. 2018. Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics 29. 371–406. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2017-0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sande, Hannah. 2019. A unified account of conditional phonological alternations: Evidence from Guébie. Language 95. 456–97. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2019.0053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank, Evans, Nicholas, Hammarström, Harald; and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2018. Language documentation twenty-five years on. Language 94.e324–e345. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2018.0070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, Aung. 2016. The traditional ecological knowledge of the Solega: A linguistic perspective. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24681-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skilton, Amalia. 2021. Ticuna (tca) language documentation: A guide to materials in the California Language Archive. Language Documentation & Conservation 15. 153–89. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24972.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 2018. Language rights and revitalization. The Routledge handbook of language revitalization, ed. by Hinton, Leanne, Huss, Leena, and Roche, Gerald, 13–21. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove, Phillipson, Robert; and Rannut, Mart. 2010. Linguistic human rights: Overcoming linguistic discrimination. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110866391.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin: Zed.Google Scholar
Suchard, Marc A., Lemey, Philippe, Baele, Guy, Ayres, Daniel L., Drummond, Alexei J.; and Rambaut, Andrew. 2018. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evolution 4:vey016. DOI: 10.1093/ve/vey016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieberger, Nick, Margetts, Anna, Morey, Stephen; and Musgrave, Simon. 2016. Assessing annotated corpora as research output. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36. 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2016.1109428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Crystal. 2017. Recognizing excellence in community engaged scholarship at the University of Victoria: Peer review guidelines for faculty promotion and tenure & impact rubric. Victoria: Office of Vice President Research, University of Victoria. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/1828/8165.Google Scholar
Turner, Nancy J., and Clifton, Helen. 2006. ‘The forest and the seaweed’: Gitga'at seaweed, traditional ecological knowledge, and community survival. Traditional ecological knowledge and natural resource management, ed. by Menzies, Charles R., 65–86. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Turpin, Myfany, and Ross, Alison. 2012. Kaytetye to English dictionary. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar
Turpin, Myfany, and Si, Aung. 2017. Edible insect larvae in Kaytetye: Their nomenclature and significance. Journal of Ethnobiology 37. 120–40. DOI: 10.2993/0278-0771-37.1.120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, Anthony R. 2020. Finding Hawu: Legacy data, finding aids and the Alan T. Walker Digital Language Collection. Language Documentation & Conservation 14. 357–422. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24925.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Butler, Lynnika; and Geary, Quirina. 2016. Mutsun-English English-Mutsun dictionary: Mutsun-inkiS inkiS-mutsun riica pappel. (LD&C special publication 11.) Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24679.Google Scholar
Warner, Sam L. No'eau. 1999. Kuleana: The right, responsibility, and authority of Indigenous peoples to speak and make decisions for themselves in language and cultural revitalization. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 30. 68–93. DOI: 10.1525/aeq.1999.30.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Kim Beebe. 2019. Preserving language through documenting an endangered craft: A weaving case study in Natqgu [ntu], Solomon Islands. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (ICLDC). Audio online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44846.Google Scholar
Wilder, Benjamin T., O'Meara, Carolyn, Monti, Laurie; and Nabhan, Gary Paul. 2016. The importance of indigenous knowledge in curbing the loss of language and biodiversity. Bioscience 66. 499–509. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2003. Defining documentary linguistics. Language Documentation and Description 1. 35–51. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/006.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2011. Language documentation. The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, ed. by Austin, Peter K. and Sallabank, Julia, 159–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511975981.009.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2014. Archives and audiences: Toward making endangered language documentations people can read, use, understand, and admire. Language Documentation and Description (Special issue on language documentation and archiving, ed. by Nathan, David and Austin, Peter K.) 12.19–36. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/135.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by