No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2026
[See the introductory paragraphs and the section headings.]
Certain phonetic tendencies seem to come to an end without any-known cause (cf. the first and second sound shifts in the Germ. languages); others cease because of certain counter influences which develop, either phonetic or analogical.
1 Cf. Noreen, Aisl. Gram.4 § 299. 4; W. von Unwerth, Beitr. 36. 23.
2 Cf. Hugo Pipping, Inledning till studiet av de nordiska språkens ljudiära §56i: 'I paradigmet vänster (stam *wenistra-) var n åtminstone en tid framåt alveolart i några former, dentalt i andra, ty det var blott i en del kasus, som n och s sammanträffade ljudlagsenligt. Därför finner man i fvn. växlingen vinstri— vístri . . . '
3 Likewise for the preliterary era compare *sœ''waR > *sœ'uR >
(œ'u is an abnormal type of diphthong, due to the vocalization of w).
4 For this question see D. A. Seip Om bortfall av đ i Norsk', NTS 4. 211–44.
5 See Language 7. 191.