Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:13:20.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chinook Jargon in Areal and Historical Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Sarah Grey Thomason
Sarah Grey Thomason*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses two current controversies about the nature and origin of Chinook Jargon. First, evidence is presented to support the claim that CJ is a true pidgin—rather than a jargon, in Silverstein's sense (1972) of a speech form without independent grammatical status. When structural features of CJ, as used by English (and French) speakers and by Indians, are compared with those of the speakers' native languages, we see that CJ possesses a grammatical norm that differs in non-simplificatory ways from the native languages. Second, the paper explores the implications of CJ structure for the older controversy as to whether CJ existed before Europeans set up permanent trading posts in the Northwest. The major point here is that phonological and syntactic features of CJ fit well with typological features of Northwest Amerindian languages, but they are markedly non-European. This weakens the case for a post-European origin, since it is hard to explain on the hypothesis that CJ arose from Indian–white communication.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , December 1983, pp. 820 - 870
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alsop, Roland. 1815. A narrative of the adventures and sufferings of John R. Jewitt. Middletown, CT.Google Scholar
Andrade, Manuel J. 1953. Notes on the relations between Chemakum and Quileute. IJAL 19. 212–15.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1888. Chinook songs. Journal of American Folklore 1. 220–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1892. Notes on the Chemakum language. AA 5. 37–44.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911a. Introduction. Handbook of American Indian languages (BAE-B 40:1), 1–83. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911b. Chinook. Handbook of American Indian languages (BAE-B 40:1), 559–667. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911c. Tsimshian. Handbook of American Indian languages (BAE-B 40:1), 283– 422. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1933. Note on the Chinook Jargon. Lg. 9.208–13.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1934. A Chehalis text. IJAL 8. 103–10.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz, and Haeberlin, Herman. 1926. Sound shifts in Salishan dialects. IJAL 4. 117–36.Google Scholar
Bright, Jane O. 1964. The phonology of Smith River Athapaskan (Tolowa). IJAL 30. 101–7.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael G. 1975. German and English working pidgins. Paper presented at the International Conference on Pidgins & Creoles, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Cook, James. 1785. A voyage to the Pacific Ocean. London: Stockdale.Google Scholar
Demers, Modeste, Blanchet, F. N.; and Onge, L. N. St. 1871. Chinook dictionary, catechism, prayers, and hymns. Montreal: Quebec Mission.Google Scholar
Demers, Richard A. 1974. Alternating roots in Lummi. IJAL 40. 15–21.Google Scholar
Drachman, Gaberell. 1969. Twana phonology. (Working papers in linguistics, Ohio State University, 5.) Columbus.Google Scholar
Drechsel, Emanuel J. MS. Structure and function in Mobilian Jargon: Indications for the pre-European existence of an American Indian pidgin. To appear, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Symposium on Historical Linguistics and Philology.Google Scholar
Edel, May Mandelbaum. 1939. The Tillamook language. IJAL 10. 1–57.Google Scholar
Elmendorf, William. 1939. Field notes on Chinook Jargon from a Twana Indian, MS.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A., and DeBose, Charles E. 1977. Simplified registers, broken language, and pidginization. Pidgin and creole linguistics, ed. by Valdman, Albert, 99–125. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo J. 1922a. Coos. Handbook of American Indian languages (BAE-B 40:2), 297–429. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo J. 1922b. Siuslawan (Lower Umpqua). Handbook of American Indian languages (BAE-B 40:2), 431–629. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Gill, John K. 1891. Dictionary of the Chinook Jargon with examples of use in conversation. 9th ed. Portland, OR: J. K. Gill. [Originally published in 1878.]Google Scholar
Goddard, Pliny Earle. 1911. Athapascan (Hupa). Handbook of American Indian languages (BAE-B 40:1), 85–158. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor. 1976. Tututni (Oregon Athapaskan). IJAL 42. 217–27.Google Scholar
Grant, Rena V. 1945. Chinook Jargon. IJAL 11. 225–33.Google Scholar
Hale, Horatio. 1846. United States exploring expedition during the years 1838–1842: Ethnography and philology. Philadelphia: Sherman. [Reprinted, Ridgewood, NJ: Gregg, 1968.]Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. Jr., 1966. Pidgin and creole languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, John P. MS. Chinook Jargon words from a Chehalis speaker (1941?)Google Scholar
Harrison, J. A. 1883. Review of Kreolische Studien IV-V, by Schuchardt, Hugo. American Journal of Philology 4.518.Google Scholar
Hess, Thom. 1976. Dictionary of Puget Salish. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harry. 1966. Galice Athapaskan: A grammatical sketch. IJAL 32. 320–27.Google Scholar
Hukari, Thomas E. 1976. Person in a Coast Salish language. IJAL 42. 305–18.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1955. The language of the Kathlamet Chinook. Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1971 (ed.) Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1980. Commentary. Theoretical orientations in creole studies, ed. by Valdman, Albert & Highfield, Arnold, 389–423. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melville. 1932. Notes on the structure of Chinook Jargon. Lg. 8.27–50.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melville. 1936. Texts in Chinook Jargon. University of Washington publications in anthropology, 7:1.1–27.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melville. 1945. Kalapuya texts. University of Washington publications in anthropology, 11. 1–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel V. 1978. Chinook Jargon: A computer-assisted analysis of variation in an American Indian pidgin. University of Kansas dissertation.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1966a (ed.) Tales in Chinook Jargon [MS compiled from Boas 1933, Jacobs 1936.]Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1966b (ed.) Short sentences in Chinook Jargon [MS compiled from Hale, Winthrop, and Gill.]Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1968. Chinook Jargon vocabulary with grammatical notes [ms].Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1971. A report on Chinook Jargon. In Hymes, 275–8.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul, and Sankoff, Gillian. 1974. A language-universals approach to pidgins and creoles. Pidgins and creoles: Current trends and prospects, ed. by DeCamp, David & Hancock, Ian F., 61–72. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale. 1963. Phonology and morphology in Upper Chehalis. IJAL 29. 181–95.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale. 1976. The copula and negatives in inland Olympic Salish. IJAL 42. 17–23.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael E. 1965. Eyak: A preliminary report. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 10. 167–87.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Aert H. 1967. The Squamish language: Grammar, texts, dictionary. (Janua linguarum, series practica, 73.) The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1946. Chipewyan. Linguistic structures of native America, by Harry Hoijer et al., 398–423. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1970. English as a VSO language. Lg. 46.286–99.Google Scholar
Meares, John. 1790. Voyages made in the years 1788 and 1789 from China to the North West Coast of America. London.Google Scholar
Moziño, José Mariano. 1970. Noticias de Nutka [1792]. English translation by Iris H. Wilson. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Notices. 1956. Notices and voyages of the famed Quebec Mission to the Pacific Northwest. Being the correspondence, notices, etc., of Fathers Blanchet and Demers, together with those of Fathers Bolduc and Langlois ... mission to the engagés of the Hudson's Bay Company and the pagan natives, 1838 to 1847. Portland, OR: Oregon Historical Society.Google Scholar
Palmer, Joel. 1847. Journal of travels over the Rocky Mountains, to the mouth of the Columbia River, made during the years 1845 and 1846. Cincinnati: J. A. & U. P. James. [Available in Facsimile series, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.]Google Scholar
Parker, Rev. Samuel A. M. 1842. Journal of an exploring tour beyond the Rocky Mountains ... in the years 1835, ‘36, and ‘37. 3rd ed. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Poggi, Claudine. 1981. Klallam auxiliaries: A subclass of predicatives. Working papers, 16th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, ed. by Mattina, Anthony & Montier, Timothy, 63–9. Missoula: University of Montana.Google Scholar
Powell, J. V. 1971. Quileute deixis—a study of grammatical markedness. Studies in Northwest Indian languages, ed. by Hoard, James & Hess, Thorn (Sacramento Anthropological Society, Publ. 11), 91–109. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Reinecke, John E. 1971. Tây Bôi: Notes on the Pidgin French of Vietnam. In Hymes, 47–56.Google Scholar
Richardson, Albert D. 1867. Beyond the Mississippi. Hartford: American.Google Scholar
Rigsby, Bruce. 1975. Nass-Gitksan: An analytic ergative syntax. IJAL 41. 346–54.Google Scholar
Ross, Alexander. 1849. Adventures of the first settlers on the Oregon or Columbia River: Being a narrative of the expedition fitted out by John Jacob Astor, to establish the ‘Pacific Fur Company’; with an account of some Indian tribes on the coast of the Pacific. London: Smith, Elder & Co. [Available in March of America facsimile series, 58. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.]Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1980. Colonization and Central African linguae francae (MS).Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1914. Notes on Chasta Costa phonology and morphology. (University of Pennsylvania, University Museum anthropological publications, 2:2.) Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward, and Swadesh, Morris. 1939. Nootka texts: Tales and ethnological narratives, with grammatical notes and lexical materials. Philadelphia: LSA.Google Scholar
Shaw, George C. 1909. The Chinook Jargon and how to use it: A complete and exhaustive lexicon of the oldest trade language of the American continent. Seattle: Rainier.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1972. Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems. Lg. 48.378.ndash;406, 596–625.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1973. Dynamics of recent linguistic contact. To appear in Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 16, Languages, I, ed. by Ives Goddard.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1974. Dialectal developments in Chinookan tense-aspect systems: An areal-historical analysis. (IJAL memoir 29.) Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Penutian: An assessment. The languages of native America: Historical and comparative assessment, ed. by Campbell, Lyle and Mithun, Marianne, 650–91. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Warren A. 1968. Southern Puget Sound Salish: Phonology and morphology. (Sacramento Anthropological Society, publ. 8.) Sacramento.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1936. Nootka internal syntax. IJAL 9. 77–102.Google Scholar
Swan, James Gilchrist. 1857. The northwest coast. New York: Harper. [Reprint, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1972.]Google Scholar
Teit, James A., and Boas, Franz. 1928. The Salishan tribes of the western plateaus. (Bureau of American Ethnology, Annual report 45.) Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1980a. On interpreting The Indian Interpreter'. Language in Society 9. 167–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1980b. Morphological instability, with and without language contact. Historical morphology, ed. by Fisiak, Jacek, 359–72. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1981. Review article on The genesis of language, ed. by Kenneth, C. Hill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3. 237–49.Google Scholar
Kenneth, C, and Kaufman, Terrence, MS. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1979. Salishan and the Northwest. The languages of native America: Historical and comparative assessment, ed. by Campbell, Lyle and Mithun, Marianne, 692–765. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, and Thompson, M. Terry. 1966. A fresh look at Tillamook phonology. IJAL 32. 313–19.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1971. Clallam: A preview. Studies in American Indian linguistics, ed. by Sawyer, Jesse O. Jr. (University of California publications in linguistics, 65), 251–94. Berkeley & Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Twain, Mark. 1872. Roughing it. New York: Harper. [Reprinted, New York: Signet, 1962.]Google Scholar
Tweddell, Colin Ellidge. 1950. The Snoqualmie-Duwamish dialects of Puget Sound Coast Salish: An outline of phonemics and morphology. University of Washington publications in anthropology, 12. 1–78.Google Scholar
Whinnom, Keith. 1971. Linguistic hybridization and the ‘special case’ of pidgins and creoles. In Hymes, 91–117.Google Scholar
Winthrop, Theodore. 1863. The canoe and the saddle: Adventures among the northwestern rivers and forests. Boston: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
Woodward, Mary. 1964. Hupa phonemics. Studies in Californian linguistics, ed. by Bright, William (University of California publications in linguistics, 34), 199–216. Berkeley & Los Angeles.Google Scholar