Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T20:49:21.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital infrastructure and its impacts on language work: A case study of FieldWorks Language Explorer (FLEx)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2026

Amalia Skilton,
Sofia Gottlieb Pierson,
Sunkulp Ananthanarayan and
Claire Bowern
Amalia Skilton*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Sofia Gottlieb Pierson*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Sunkulp Ananthanarayan*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Claire Bowern*
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
Skilton, University of Edinburgh, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, 3 Charles Street Edinburgh EH8 9AD, UK [askilton@ed.ac.uk]
[spierson@utexas.edu]
[sunnya1@uw.edu]
[claire.bowern@yale.edu]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Linguists need to collect, organize, analyze, and share data. Despite the variability of linguistic research in terms of inputs and outcomes, there are some common stages, including morphological parsing, lexicon creation, and textual editing. A common software tool for this work is FieldWorks Language Explorer (FLEx). In this article, we examine some of the ways that FLEx’s data structures conflict with contemporary practices in language work. These assumptions exclude key groups of users and erect barriers to theoretically and practically relevant research. Where workarounds are feasible, they are both fragile and costly. We use this example to start a broader conversation about software infrastructure for digital linguistic data analysis, and how problems with this infrastructure reflect larger issues in language documentation and linguistics.

Keywords

linguistic softwaredatabasesdata ethicslexicographycorporamorphological parsing

Information

Type
Language Revitalization and Documentation
Information
Language , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , September 2025, pp. e136 - e165
Copyright
Copyright © 2025 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, P. 2020. Revitalization lexicography: The making of the new Tunica dictionary. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Daryl, Costa, David J.; and Troy, Douglas. 2016. Myaamiaataweenki eek-incikoonihkiinki eeyoonki aapisaataweenki: A Miami language digital tool for language reclamation. Language Documentation & Conservation 10.394–410. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24713.Google Scholar
Barlo, Stuart, Boyd, William (Bill) Edgar, Hughes, Margaret, Wilson, Shawn; and Pelizzon, Alessandro. 2021. Yarning as protected space: Relational accountability in research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 17(1).40–48. DOI: 10.1177/1177180120986151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begay, Kayla. 2017. Wailaki grammar. Berkeley: University of California dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76x3h5kg.Google Scholar
Beier, Christine, and Michael, Lev. 2022. Managing lexicography data: A practical, principled approach using FLEx (FieldWorks Language Explorer). In Berez-Kroeker, et al., 301–14. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea, McDonnell, Bradley, Koller, Eve; and Collister, Lauren B. (eds.) 2022. The open handbook of linguistic data management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Steven, and Simons, Gary. 2003. Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description. Language 79(3).557–82. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2003.0149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Andy, Simons, Gary; and Zook, Ken. 2007. Parser and interlinear text. Online: https://software.sil.org/fieldworks/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2016/10/Parser-and-interlinear-text.pdf.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2024. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Online: https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2003. Laves’ Bardi texts. Maintaining the links: Language, identity and the land: Proceedings of the Seventh FEL Conference, ed. by Blythe, Joseph and Brown, R. McKenna, 137–43. Broome: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2015. Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brixey, Jacqueline, and Artstein, Ron. 2021. ChoCo: A multimodal corpus of the Choctaw language. Language Resources and Evaluation 55.241–57. DOI: 10.1007/s10579-020-09494-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Lynnika, and Volkinburg, Heather van. 2007. Review of Fieldworks Language Explorer (FLEx). Language Documentation & Conservation 1.100–106. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/1730.Google Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary (eds.) 2024. Decolonizing linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana Lakshmi, and Joseph, Willem Reuse, de. 2011. Handbook of descriptive linguistic fieldwork. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9026-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiblow, Susan, and Meighan, Paul J.. 2022. Language is land, land is language: The importance of Indigenous languages. Human Geography 15(2).206–10. DOI: 10.1177/19427786211022899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael, and Good, Jeff. 2013. Languoid, doculect and glossonym: Formalizing the notion ‘language’. Language Documentation & Conservation 7.331–59. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4606.Google Scholar
Davis, Jenny L. 2017. Resisting rhetorics of language endangerment: Reclamation through Indigenous language survivance. Language Documentation and Description 14.37–58. DOI: 10.25894/LDD147.Google Scholar
Debenport, Erin, Goeman, Mishuana, Montenegro, Maria; and Wynne, Michael. 2023. How a dictionary became an archive: Community language reclamation using the Mukurtu content management system. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 44(2).29–55. DOI: 10.1353/dic.2023.a915064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marneffe, Marie Catherine, Manning, Christopher, Nivre, Joakim; and Zeman, Daniel. 2021. Universal dependencies. Computational Linguistics 47(2).255–308. DOI: 10.1162/coli_a_00402.Google Scholar
Dobrin, Lise. 2021. The Arapesh ‘suitcase miracle’: The interpretive value of reproducible research. Language Documentation and Description 21.37–69. DOI: 10.25894/LDD16.Google Scholar
Dobrin, Lise, and Good, Jeff. 2009. Practical language development: Whose mission? Language 85(3).619–29. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, Joel, Cook, Gina; and Horner, Joshua. 2014. LingSync & the Online Linguistic Database: New models for the collection and management of data for language communities, linguists and language learners. Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, 24–33. DOI: 10.3115/v1/W14-2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience L., Webster, Anthony K.; and Woodbury, Anthony C.. 2017. A holistic humanities of speaking: Franz Boas and the continuing centrality of texts. International Journal of American Linguistics 83(1).41–78. DOI: 10.1086/689547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, José Luis, Hooft, Anuschka van’T, Carretero, Jesus; and Sosa-Sosa, Victor J.. 2017. Nenek: A cloud-based collaboration platform for the management of Amerindian language resources. Language Resources and Evaluation 51.897–925. DOI: 10.1007/s10579-016-9361-8.Google Scholar
Grzech, Karolina, and Shaca, Selena Tisalema. 2022. Building trust on Zoom:Aworkflow for language documentation via videoconferencing software. Language Documentation & Conservation 16.79–97. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74673.Google Scholar
Guzman Guzman, Veronica. 2012. Las construcciones aplicativas en el mixe de Totonte-pec. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social master’s thesis. Online: http://ciesas.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/ 1015/1092.Google Scholar
Harvey, Dan. 2022. ACORNS: Acquisition of Restored Native Speech. Online: https://acornslinguistics.com/.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit, and Jung, Dagmar. 2020. Child-directed language–and how it informs the documentation and description of the adult language. Language Documentation & Conservation 14.188–214. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24920.Google Scholar
Henke, Ryan, and Berez-Kroeker, Andrea. 2016. A brief history of archiving in language documentation, with an annotated bibliography. Language Documentation & Conservation 10.411–57. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24714.Google Scholar
Holden, Josh. 2013. Benasnì–I remember: Dene Sųłiné oral histories with morphological analysis. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gary, Leonard, Wesley Y.; and Pulsifer, Peter L.. 2022. Indigenous peoples, ethics, and linguistic data. In Berez-Kroeker, et al., 49–60. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protocol, Indigenous and Intelligence, Artificial Group, Working. 2020. Guidelines for Indigenous-centred AI design v. 1. Indigenous protocol and artificial intelligence position paper, ed. by Lewis, Jason Edward, 20–24. Honolulu: The Initiative for Indigenous Futures and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR). DOI: 10.11573/spectrum.library.concordia.ca.00986506.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel, and Finkel, Raphael. 2018. Kratylos: A tool for sharing interlinearized and lexical data in diverse formats. Language Documentation & Conservation 12.124–46. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24765.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2017. Producing language reclamation by decolonising ‘language’. Language Documentation and Description 14.15–36. DOI: 10.25894/LDD146.Google Scholar
Lukaniec, Megan. 2022. Managing data from archival documentation for language reclamation. In Berez-Kroeker, et al., 315–26. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, vol. 1: Transcription format and programs. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: 10.4324/9781315805672.Google Scholar
Mattern, Eleanor. 2022. The linguistic data life cycle, sustainability of data, and principles of solid data management. In Berez-Kroeker, et al., 61–72. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Michael. 2003. Hermit Crab: Parsing and generating with classical generative phonology and morphology. Dallas: SIL International Digital Resources. Online: https://www.sil.org/resources/archives/5746.Google Scholar
McCarty, Teresa L., Nicholas, Sheilah E., Chew, Kari A. B., Diaz, Natalie G., Leonard, Wesley Y.; and White, Louellyn. 2018. Hear our languages, hear our voices: Story-work as theory and praxis in Indigenous-language reclamation. Daedalus 147(2).160–72. DOI: 10.1162/DAED_a_00499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenny, Daryn, Genetti, Carol; and Chacón, Thiago. 2013. How indigenous conceptions shape the work: The case of the Miromaa Aboriginal Language and Technology Centre. Third International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (ICLDC), University of Hawai‘i. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/26077.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Green, Jennifer; and Turpin, Myfany. 2018. Understanding linguistic fieldwork. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203701294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Language, Miromaa Aboriginal & Centre, Technology. 2023. Miromaa. [Software] Online: https://www.miromaa.org.au/miromaa-software/get-started.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 2015. Putting oral narratives into writing–Experiences from a language documentation project in Bougainville, Papua New Guinea. Language contact and documentation/Contacto lingüístico y documentación, ed. by Comrie, Bernard and Golluscio, Lucía, 321–42. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110317473.321.Google Scholar
MuKURTU. 2023. Mukurtu content management system. [Software platform] Online: https://mukurtu.org/.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Simon, and Thieberger, Nick. 2021. The language documentation quartet. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, vol. 1 (Papers), 6–12. Online: https://aclanthology.org/2021.computel-1.2.Google Scholar
Ray, Erik T. 2003. Learning XML. 2nd edn. Beijing: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
Rehm, Georg. 2016. The language resource life cycle: Towards a generic model for creating, maintaining, using and distributing language resources. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), 245054. Online: https://aclanthology.org/L16-1388.Google Scholar
Rogers, Chris. 2010. Review of FieldWorks Language Explorer (FLEx) 3.0. Language Documentation & Conservation 4.78–84. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4471.Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah, and Ewert, Marcus. 2023. TwistedTongues. [Software] Online: https://twisted-tongues-beta.appspot.com/#/.Google Scholar
Skilton, Amalia, Ananthanarayan, Sunkulp, Pierson, Sofia G.; and Bowern, Claire. 2025. Flibl: A tool to ease text transfer between ELAN and FLEx. Language Documentation & Conservation 19.158–75. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/74815.Google Scholar
Sneller, Betsy, Wagner, Suzanne Evans; and Ye, Yongqing. 2022. MI Diaries: Ethical and practical challenges. Linguistics Vanguard (Special issue: COVID-era sociolinguistics, ed. by Betsy Sneller) 8(s3).307–19. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2021-0051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneller, Betsy, Werner, Russ, Agrawal, Hemkesh, Magaway, Daniel, Coleman, Tess, Yan, Shiyu; and Crooks, Albert. 2023. MiDRF App Builder. [Software] Online: https://builder.mi-diaries.org/.Google Scholar
Sullivant, Ryan. 2020. Archival description for language documentation collections. Language Documentation & Conservation 14.520–78. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24949.Google Scholar
Global, SIL. 2022. FieldWorks Language Explorer. [Software] Online: https://software.sil .org/fieldworks/download/fw-91/fw-9118/.Google Scholar
Suslak, Daniel. 2005. The future of Totontepecano Mixe: Youth and language in the Mixe highlands. Chicago: University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Tsikewa, Adrienne. 2021. Reimagining the current praxis of field linguistics training: De-colonial considerations. Language 97(4).e293–e319. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2021.0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Margaret Kemarre, and Matthew, Barry McDonald, John. 2010. Iwenhe Tyerrtye: What it means to be an Aboriginal person. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar
Tynan, Laura. 2024. Data collection versus knowledge theft: Relational accountability and the research ethics of Indigenous knowledges. Challenging global development, ed. by Melber, Henning, Kothari, Uma, Camfield, Laura, and Biekart, Kees, 139–64. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30308-1_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Luna, Quirina; and Butler, Lynnika. 2007. Ethics and revitalization of dormant languages: The Mutsun language. Language Documentation & Conservation 1.58–76. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/1727.Google Scholar
Whalen, Douglas H., Lewis, Melissa E., Gillson, Stefanie, McBeath, Brittany, Alexander, Bri; and Nyhan, Kate. 2022. Health effects of Indigenous language use and revitalization: A realist review. International Journal for Equity in Health 21:169. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01782-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, David. 1992. Linguistic research under Aboriginal control: A personal account of fieldwork in Central Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 12.171–200. DOI: 10.1080/07268609208599475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Nicholas, de, Wilson Silva, Lima, McPherson, Laura; and Good, Jeff. 2021. COVID-19 and documentary linguistics: Some ways forward. Language Documentation and Description 20.359–77. DOI: 10.25894/ldd57.Google Scholar
Wilson, Stan, and Wilson, Peggy. 1998. Editorial–Relational accountability to all our relations. Canadian Journal of Native Education 22.155–58. DOI: 10.14288/cjne.v22i2.195838.Google Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter;HennieBrugman;AlbertRussel;AlexKlassmann; and HANSLOETJES, . 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), 1556–59. Online: https://aclanthology.org/L06-1082/.Google Scholar
Woods, Lesley. 2023. Something’s gotta change: Redefining collaborative linguistic research. Canberra: ANU Press. DOI: 10.22459/SGC.2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar