Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:25:22.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Sociolinguistic Processing: Real-Time Changes in Judgments of Speaker Competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Erez Levon ,
Devyani Sharma  and
Yang Ye
Erez Levon*
Affiliation:
University of Bern
Devyani Sharma*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Yang Ye*
Affiliation:
University of Greenwich
*
Center for the Study of Language and Society, Muesmattstrasse 45, 3012 Bern, Switzerland, [erez.levon@unibe.ch]
[d.sharma@qmul.ac.uk]
[y.ye@greenwich.ac.uk]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social category information plays a central role in speech perception and processing. To date, research on this topic has struggled to model how social category perceptions evolve over the time course of an interaction. In this article, we build on recent methodological developments to investigate trajectories of listener perceptions, focusing on how impressions change as linguistic, social, and contextual details emerge. We base our arguments on an analysis of listeners' real-time evaluations of the perceived competence of speakers of two British regional accents during a mock interview for a job in a law firm. Results indicate a need to move away from the view, predominant in sociolinguistics, of category perception as a discrete phenomenon and toward a model of perception as inference under uncertainty. We discuss implications for theories of sociolinguistic cognition and for understandings of accent bias.

Keywords

sociolinguistic perceptionreal-time methodsattitudesaccent biasdynamic construal

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 98 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 749 - 774
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the UK Economic and Social Research Council (grant ref: ES/P007767/1) for the research reported here. Special thanks also to Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Lauren Hall-Lew, Andries Coetzee, and two anonymous referees for their detailed comments on earlier versions of our arguments. We alone are responsible for any remaining errors or shortcomings.

References

Afifi, Walid A., and Weiner, Judith L.. 2004. Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory 14. 167–90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen, Martha, and Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2022. Real-time speaker evaluation: How useful is it and what does it measure? Language 98.e108–e130. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2022.0000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, van Rij, Jacolien, de Cat, Cecile; and Wood, Simon. 2018. Auto-correlated errors in experimental data in the language sciences: Some solutions offered by generalized additive mixed models. Mixed-effects regression models in linguistics, ed. by Speelman, Dirk, Heylen, Kris, and Geeraerts, Dirk, 49–69. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69830-4_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40. 177–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly, and Russell, Jamie. 2015. Expectations and speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137. 2823–33. DOI: 10.1121/1.4919317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, Joseph, Fisek, M. Hamit, Norman, Robert; and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1977. Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Blanden, Jo, Gregg, Paul; and Machin, Stephen. 2005. Educational inequality and intergenerational mobility. What's the good of education? The economics of education in the UK, ed. by Machin, Stephen and Vignoles, Anna, 99–114. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Scott D., and Heathcote, Andrew. 2005. A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological Review 112. 117–28. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Scott D., and Heathcote, Andrew. 2008. The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology 57. 153–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnett, Heather. 2019. Signalling games, sociolinguistic variation and the construction of style. Linguistics and Philosophy 42. 419–50. DOI: 10.1007/s10988-018-9254-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office. 2011. Opening doors, breaking barriers: A strategy for social mobility. Online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/61964/opening-doors-breaking-barriers.pdf.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37. 637–59. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404508080974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21. 135–56. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394509000052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86. 52–68. DOI: 10.1215/00031283-1277510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Amanda, Levon, Erez, Sharma, Devyani, Watt, Dominic; and Ye, Yang. 2019. Inter-speaker variation and the evaluation of British English accents in employment contexts. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Melbourne, 1615–51. Online: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_1664.pdf.Google Scholar
Cargile, Aaron C., and Giles, Howard. 1997. Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language and Communication 17. 195–217. DOI: 10.1016/S0271-5309(97)00016-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cargile, Aaron C., Giles, Howard, Ryan, Ellen B.; and Bradac, James J.. 1994. Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language and Communication 14. 211–36. DOI: 10.1016/0271-5309(94)90001-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel, and Lupyan, Gary. 2015. All concepts are ad hoc concepts. The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts, ed. by Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen, 543–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, and Maheswaran, Durairaj. 1994. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66. 460–73. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheshire, Jenny, Fox, Sue, Kerswill, Paul; and Torgersen, Eivind. 2008. Ethnicity, friendship network, and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica 22. 1–23. DOI: 10.1515/9783484605299.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue; and Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15. 151–96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory. 2014. The son also rises: Surnames and the history of social mobility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert L., and Fishman, Joshua A.. 1974. The study of language attitudes. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1974(3). 5–20. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1974.3.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, and Bishop, Hywel. 2007. Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11. 74–93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00311.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette. 2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19. 241–56. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie, and Kirtley, M. Joelle. 2016. Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, ed. by Babel, Anna, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139680448.003.Google Scholar
Dragojevic, Marko, and Giles, Howard. 2014. The reference frame effect: An intergroup perspective on language attitudes. Human Communication Research 40. 91–111. DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunton, Bridget C., and Fazio, Russell H.. 1997. An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23. 316–26. DOI: 10.1177/0146167297233009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, Anne. 2005. Mobility, contact and an accent norm: The case of Received Pronunciation. The consequences of mobility, ed. by Preisler, Bent, Fabricius, Anne, Haberland, Hartmut, Kjaerbeck, Susanne, and Risager, Karen, 120–34. Roskilde: Roskilde University. Online: https://ojs.ruc.dk/index.php/mobility/article/view/5342.Google Scholar
Foschi, Martha. 2000. Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 26. 21–42. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Sue. 2015. The New Cockney: New ethnicities and adolescent speech in the traditional East End of London. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Frank, Michael C., and Goodman, Noah D.. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science 336. 998. DOI: 10.1126/science.1218633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, Jonathan B., Ambady, Nalini, Rule, Nicholas O.; and Johnson, Kerri L.. 2008. Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137. 673–90. DOI: 10.1037/a0013875.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jonathan B., Pauker, Kristin, Apfelbaum, Evan P.; and Ambady, Nalini. 2010. Continuous dynamics in the real-time perception of race. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46. 179–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Sam, Laurison, Daniel; and Miles, Andrew. 2015. Breaking the ‘class’ ceiling? Social mobility into Britain's elite occupations. The Sociological Review 63. 259–89. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.12283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2016. Sociolinguistic differentiation. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, ed. by Coupland, Nikolas, 113–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107449787.006.Google Scholar
Getz, Laura M., and Toscano, Joseph C.. 2021. The time-course of speech perception revealed by temporally-sensitive neural measures. WIREs Cognitive Science 12:e1541. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review 22. 211–27. DOI: 10.1080/0013191700220301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard. 2011. Language attitudes: The role of motivated information management. Canadian Issues, Autumn, 28–34.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, and Marlow, Mikaela L.. 2011. Theorizing language attitudes: Existing frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. Annals of the International Communication Association 35. 161–97. DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2011.11679116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, and Rakić, Tamara, 2014. Language attitudes: Social determinants and consequences of language variation. The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology, ed. by Holtgraves, Thomas, 11–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.013.030.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas, Reubold, Ulrich, Schiel, Florian; and Stevens, Mary. 2018. Linking cognitive and social aspects of sound change using agent-based modeling. Topics in Cognitive Science 10. 707–28. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, Jennifer. 2018. Sociophonetics: The role of words, the role of context, and the role of words in context. Topics in Cognitive Science 10. 696–706. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, Jennifer, and Drager, Katie. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48. 865–92. DOI: 10.1515/ling.2010.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Drager, Katie; and Gibson, Andy. 2018. Hearing r-sandhi: The role of past experience. Language 94. 360–404. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2018.0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesson, Ashley, and Shellgren, Madeline. 2015. Discourse marker like in real time: Characterizing the time-course of sociolinguistic impression formation. American Speech 90. 154–86. DOI: 10.1215/00031283-3130313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, Katherine, and Jeong, Sunwoo. 2019. The role of context in sociolinguistic perception. Linguistics Vanguard 5:20180069. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2018-0069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert A.; and Salmons, Joseph. 2007. Vowel duration in three American English dialects. American Speech 82. 367–85. DOI: 10.1215/00031283-2007-024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34. 485–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith, Strand, Elizabeth A.; and D'Imperio, Mariapaola. 1999. Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics 27. 359–84. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, and Williams, Ann. 2002. ‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, ed. by Jones, Mari C. and Esch, Edith, 81–110. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110892598.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jonny, and Drager, Katie. 2018. Rapid influence of word-talker associations on lexical access. Topics in Cognitive Science 10. 775–86. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kircher, Ruth, and Fox, Sue. 2019. Multicultural London English and its speakers: A corpus-informed discourse study of standard language ideology and social stereotypes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 42. 792–810. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2019.1666856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinschmidt, Dave F., and Jaeger, T. Florian. 2015. Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review 122. 148–203. DOI: 10.1037/a0038695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinschmidt, Dave F., Weatherholtz, Kodi; and Jaeger, T. Florian. 2018. Sociolinguistic perception as inference under uncertainty. Topics in Cognitive Science 10. 818–34. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, Michael W., Torrez, Brittany, Park, Jun Won; and Ghayebi, Fariba. 2019. Evidence for the reproduction of social class in brief speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116. 22998–23003. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900500116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristiansen, Tore. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41. 167–92. DOI: 10.1080/03740460903364219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 2010. Attitudes, ideology and awareness. The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. by Wodak, Ruth, Johnstone, Barbara, and Kerswill, Paul, 265–78. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej; and Nagy, Naomi. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15. 431–63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev-Ari, Shiri, Ho, Emily; and Keysar, Boaz. 2018. The unforeseen consequences of interacting with non-native speakers. Topics in Cognitive Science 10. 835–49. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levon, Erez. 2014. Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 43. 539–66. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404514000554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez, and Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2015. Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change 27. 319–48. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394515000149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez, Buchstaller, Isabelle; and Mearns, Adam. 2020. Towards an integrated model of perception: Linguistic architecture and the dynamics of sociolinguistic cognition. Advancing socio-grammatical variation and change: In honour of Jenny Cheshire, ed. by Beaman, Karen, Buchstaller, Isabelle, Fox, Susan, and Walker, James, 32–54. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez, Sharma, Devyani, Cardoso, Amanda, Ye, Yang; and Watt, Dominic. 2020. Attitudes to accents in Britain: Ideologies, phonetic detail and the reproduction of accent bias. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans, January 2020.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez, Sharma, Devyani; and Watt, Dominic. 2017–2021. Accent bias and fair access in Britain. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Online: https://accentbiasbritain.org/.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez, Sharma, Devyani, Watt, Dominic, Cardoso, Amanda; and Ye, Yang. 2021. Accent bias and perceptions of professional competence in England. Journal of English Linguistics 49. 355–88. DOI: 10.1177/00754242211046316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez, and Ye, Yang. 2020. Language, indexicality and gender ideologies: Contextual effects on the perceived credibility of women. Gender and Language 14. 123–51. DOI: 10.1558/genl.39235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. Neil, and Bodenhausen, Galen V.. 2001. Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology 92. 239–55. DOI: 10.1348/000712601162059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, Rowena. 2013. David Cameron admits ministers must ‘do far more’ to increase social mobility. The Guardian, 14 November 2013. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/nov/14/david-cameron-social-mobility-major.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Robert M., and Carrie, Erin. 2018. Implicit-explicit attitudinal discrepancy and the investigation of language attitude change in progress. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39. 830–44. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1445744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Chris, and Moore, Emma. 2018. Evaluating S(c)illy voices: The effects of salience, stereotypes, and co-present language variables on real-time reactions to regional speech. Language 94. 629–61. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2018.0038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2007. Talking proper: The rise of accent as social symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18. 62–85. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X99018001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A., and Preston, Dennis R.. 2003. Folk linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110803389.Google Scholar
Pantos, Andrew. 2019. Implicitness, automaticity, and consciousness in language attitudes research: Are they related and how do we characterize them? Linguistics Vanguard 5:20180007. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2018-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus Spindler; and Kristiansen, Tore. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43. 1–31. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404513000857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Whaddayaknow? The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5. 40–74. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, ed. by Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, and Zeigler, Evelyn, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2019. How to trick respondents into revealing implicit attitudes—talk to them. Linguistics Vanguard 5:20180006. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2018-0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: https://www.r-project.org/.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani, Levon, Erez; and Ye, Yang. 2021. 50 years of British accent bias: Stability and lifespan change in attitudes to accents. English World-Wide 43. 135–66. DOI: 10.1075/eww.20010.sha.Google Scholar
Shaw, George Bernard. 1916. Pygmalion. New York: Brentano.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas. 1762. A course of lectures on elocution: Together with two dissertations on language; and some other tracts relative to those subjects. London: W. Strahan.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The limits of awareness. (Sociolinguistic working paper 84.) Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED250941.Google Scholar
Commission, Social Mobility. 2019. State of the nation 2018–19: Social mobility in Great Britain. Online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/798404/SMC_State_of_the_Nation_Report_2018-19.pdf.Google Scholar
Márton, Sóskuthy. 2017. Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: A practical introduction. (White Rose research online working paper.) York: University of York. Online: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/113858/.Google Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2014. Processing, evaluation, knowledge: Testing the perception of English subject–verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics 42. 144–72. DOI: 10.1177/0075424214526057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja, López-Ibáñez, Manuel, Brown, Georgina; and Leemann, Adrian. 2020. General Northern English: Exploring regional variation in the North of England with machine learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3:48. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.00048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, Meghan, Kim, Seung Kyung, King, Ed; and McGowan, Kevin B.. 2014. The socially weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology 4:1015. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Rij, Jacolien, Wieling, Martijn, Baayen, R. Harald; and van Rijn, Hedderik. 2020. itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrelated data using GAMMs. R package. Online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/itsadug/index.html.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, and Hesson, Ashley. 2014. Individual sensitivity to the frequency of socially meaningful linguistic cues affects language attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33. 651–66. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X14528713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Abby, and Hay, Jen. 2011. Congruence between ‘word age’ and ‘voice age’ facilitates lexical access. Laboratory Phonology 2. 219–37. DOI: 10.1515/labphon.2011.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Kevin, and Clark, Lynn. 2013. How salient is the nurse~square merger? English Language & Linguistics 17. 297–323. DOI: 10.1017/S136067431300004X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Kevin, and Clark, Lynn. 2015. Exploring listeners' real-time reactions to regional accents. Language Awareness 24. 38–59. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2014.882346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojnowicz, Michael T., Ferguson, Melissa J., Dale, Rick; and Spivey, Michael J.. 2009. The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science 20. 1428–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02448.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, Simon N. 2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B: Statistical Methodology 73. 3–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Simon N. 2017. Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. 2nd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 1993. Linguistic analysis of dialect ‘correction’ and its interaction with cognitive salience. Language Variation and Change 5. 189–224. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394500001460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, Yang, Levon, Erez, Sharma, Devyani, Watt, Dominic; and Cardoso, Amanda. 2020. Mind the accent: Effects of bias reduction interventions on the evaluation of job candidates with accents in the U.K. Poster presented at the annual conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, February 2020.Google Scholar