Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T20:30:08.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Syntactic Acquisition in German: Evidence for the Modal Hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

David Ingram and
William Thompson
David Ingram*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
William Thompson
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada [ingramd@unixg.ubc.ca]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Poeppel and Wexler (1993) present the Full Competence Hypothesis, which claims that German children very early (circa age 2) acquire finiteness, verb agreement, and verb movement. They also propose the Grammatical Infinitive Hypothesis, which states that children have the option of using either a finite or nonfinite form and randomly select verbs for one or the other. The data on which these claims are based consist of 282 sentences from a German child at 2;1. We present a more conservative alternative, the Lexical/Semantic Hypothesis, which proposes that early learning is more lexically oriented, and that early word combinations can be explained by more semantically oriented accounts. To replace the Grammatical Infinitive Hypothesis, we put forth the Modal Hypothesis, which states that the distinction between finite and nonfinite forms can be accounted for by the modality of the sentence. Nonfinite forms occur in modal contexts, and finite ones occur in nonmodal ones. Data to support this alternative are presented from the analysis of 1084 sentences from four German children, including the subject studied in Poeppel and Wexler.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , March 1996, pp. 97 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antinucci, Francesco, and Miller, Ruth. 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3. 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Lois, Lifter, Karen, Hafitz, Karen; and Hafitz, Jeremie. 1980. Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56. 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 491–504.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit, and Wexler, Kenneth. 1987. The maturation of syntax. Parameter setting, ed. by Roeper, Tom and Williams, Edwin, 123–72. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, Martin. 1976. Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41. Serial no. 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J. P., and Sinclair, Hermine. 1973. Time, sense and aspect. Cognition 2. 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald. 1990. Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition 1. 361–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve. 1987. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language learning. Mechanisms of language learning, ed. by MacWhinney, Brian, 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, and Nakayama, Mineharu. 1987. Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language 63. 522–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déprez, Vivien, and Pierce, Amy. 1993. Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 25–67.Google Scholar
Ervin, Susan. 1964. Imitation and structural change in children's language. New directions in the study of language, ed. by Lenneberg, Eric, 163–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne, and Noonan, Marie. 1992. Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37. 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive: A universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10. 287–310.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. 1989. First language acquisition: Method, description, and explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics 28. 1407–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1986. Subject in Japanese and English. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, and Sportiche, Dominque. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85. 211–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, and Snow, Catherine. 1985. The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 12. 271–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, Virginia, and Bates, Elizabeth. 1994. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21. 339–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, Gary, Pinker, Stephen, Ullman, Michael, Hollander, Michelle, Rosen, T. John; and Xu, Fei. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57. Serial no. 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jon, and Chapman, Robin. 1985. SALT: Systematic analysis of language transcripts. Madison, WI: Language Analysis Laboratory, Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poeppel, David, and Wexler, Kenneth. 1993. The Full Competency Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, Clifton. 1987. The Pye analysis of language. Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1990. The syntax of nominal arguments in early child language. Language Acquisition 1. 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1994. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3. 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. Studies in child language development, ed. by Ferguson, Charles and Slobin, Dan, 175–208. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan. 1982. Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. Language acquisition: The state of the art, ed. by Gleitman, Lila and Wanner, Eric, 128–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, Jurgen. 1992. Null subjects in early grammars: Implications for parameter-setting theories. Theoretical issues in language acquisition: Continuity and change in development, ed. by Weissenborn, Jurgen, Goodluck, Helen, and Roeper, Thomas, 269–99. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. Verb movement, ed. by Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert, 305–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Klaus. 1985. How much do children say in a day? Journal of Child Language 12. 475–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed