Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:00:18.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Editor's Department: More on the Editorial and Production Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Other
Information
Language , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , September 2002, pp. 401 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Some speakers do draw distinctions here. Rich Janda has brought it to my attention that Dawkins (1986/1996, The blind watchmaker, New York: Norton, xvii) complains that younger speakers in the United States do not properly describe the prepublication evaluators of a manuscript as its referees, the term he prefers, saying such evaluators actually are 'not "reviewers" ...[,] pace many Americans under 40'.