Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T13:24:00.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ergativity and Word Order in Samoan Child Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Elinor Ochs
Elinor Ochs*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study of the acquisition of ergative case-marking (ECM) in Samoan indicates that it rarely appears in the speech of 2–4 year old children. It is argued that the late acquisition of ECM is caused primarily by the fact that expression of the case-marker in adult Samoan is sociolinguistically variable, with speech between household members showing the lowest frequency of expression of the case-marker. However, evidence suggests that Samoan children encode ergative distinctions through word order, in that they tend to reserve the position immediately following the verb for absolutive constituents.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 1982, pp. 646 - 671
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, Elaine. 1977. Learning to speak with style: A study of the sociolinguistic skills of children. Stanford dissertation.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R., and Chung, Sandra. 1977. On grammatical relations and clause structure in verb-initial languages. Grammatical relations (Syntax and semantics, 8), ed. by Cole, Peter & Sadock, Jerrold, 1–27. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language, ed. by Hayes, John R., 279–352. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois. 1970. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois. 1973. One word at a time: The use of single-word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1973. Early syntactic development: A cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, Cazden, Courtney; and Bellugi, Ursula. 1973. The child's grammar from I to III. Studies of language development, ed. by Ferguson, Charles & Slobin, Dan, 295–333. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Cazden, Courtney. 1965. Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar. Harvard dissertation.Google Scholar
Cazden, Courtney. 1972. Child language and education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. Syntactic typology, ed. by Lehmann, Winfred P., 329–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1979. Degrees of ergativity: Some Chukchee evidence. In Plank, 219–40.Google Scholar
Cross, Toni. 1975. Some relationships between motherese and linguistic level in accelerated children. Papers and reports on child language development, Stanford University, 10.Google Scholar
Cross, Toni. 1977. Mothers' speech adjustments: The contribution of selected child listener variables. In Snow & Ferguson, 151–89.Google Scholar
Cross, Toni. 1978. Mothers' speech and its association with rate of linguistic acquisition in young children. The development of communication, ed. by Waterson, Natalie & Snow, Catherine, 199–216. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Lg. 55.59–138.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1980. Lāuga and talanoaga: Structure and variation in the language of a Samoan speech event. (Working papers in sociolinguistics, 72.) Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1981. The fono: A Samoan speech event. University of Southern California dissertation. [To appear as Pacific Linguistics, Series B, vol. 80.]Google Scholar
Ellis, Jeffrey, and Ure, Jean N. 1969. Language variety: Register. Encyclopedia of linguistics information and control, ed. by Meetham, A. R. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1964. Baby talk in six languages. The ethnography of communication, ed. by Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell (American Anthropologist, 66:6, part 2), 103–14. Menasha: AAA.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1977. Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow & Ferguson, 219–37.Google Scholar
Garnica, Olga. 1977. Some prosodic and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In Snow & Ferguson, 63–89.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1975. The representation of semantic relations in a manual language created by deaf children of hearing parents: A language you can't dismiss out of hand. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Universals of language. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia M., and Smith, Joshua H. 1976. The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1972. Introduction. Directions in sociolinguistics, ed. by Gumperz, John & Hymes, Dell, 26–33. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1977. Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference. Georgetown University 28th Round Table on languages and linguistics, ed. by Saville-Troike, Muriel, 191–212. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg. 56.251–300.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1967. On communicative competence. University of Pennsylvania, MS.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. A structural principle of language and its implications. Lg. 49.47–66.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1970. The acquisition of language: The study of developmental psycholinguistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Milner, G. B. 1966. Samoan dictionary. London: University Press.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa. 1976. Motherese: The speech of mothers to young children. Cognitive theory, ed. by Pisoni, David & Potts, G., vol., II. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Transcription as theory. Developmental pragmatics, ed. by Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi B., 43–72. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. MS. Variation and error: A sociolinguistic approach to language acquisition in Samoa. To appear in The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, ed. by Dan I. Slobin. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1979 (ed.) Ergativity. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Clifton. 1980. The acquisition of person markers in Quiché Mayan. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, Stanford University, 19. 53–9.Google Scholar
Radulović, Lubiza. 1975. Acquisition of language: Studies of Dubrovnik children. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Schenkein, James. 1978 (ed.) Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi. 1979. How Kaluli children learn what to say, what to do, and how to feel: An ethnographic study of the development of communicative competence. Columbia University dissertation.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. 1974. Relational concepts underlying language. Language perspectives, ed. by Schiefelbusch, Richard L. & Lloyd, L. L., 129–51. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, Robert M. W., 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the acquisition of grammar. Studies of child language development, ed. by Ferguson, Charles & Slobin, Dan I., 125–208. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1975. The more it changes ...: On understanding language by watching it move through time. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, Stanford University, 10. 1–30.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1978. Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. Paper prepared for Workshop-Conference on Language Acquisition: State of the Art. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Snow, Catherine. 1972. Mother's speech to children learning language. Child Development 43. 549–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, Catherine, and Ferguson, Charles. 1977 (eds.) Talking to children. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Tuitele, N. T., and Kneubuhl, J. 1978. 'Upu Sāmoa. [Samoan words.] Pago Pago: Bilingual/Bicultural Education Project of American Samoa.Google Scholar
Tuitele, N. T., Sapolu, M. J.; and Kneubuhl, J. 1978. La tātou gagana: Tusi muamua. [Our language: First volume.] Pago Pago: Bilingual/Bicultural Education Project of American Samoa.Google Scholar