No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2026
[An argument against Sturtevant's interpretation of the aspiration by laryngeals in the IH personal endings (Lang. 16.179–82); summarized in the last section.]
1 Language 16.179–82 (1940).
2 Chr. Bartholomae, Altiranisches Wörterbuch, cols. 1862–3 (1904).
3 H. Reichelt, Awestisches Elementarbuch §42.4; except after spirants.
4 Reichelt, op.cit. §45.
5 Bartholomae, Gdr. d. iran. Philologie 1.84 §151 end.
6 Bartholomae, AiW col. 1863.24–5.
7 W. Caland, GGA 1893.398; cf. 1st pl. pf. didvīšma, to root ṭbaēš-. But H. Pedersen, KZ 39.253 (1906), thought that the aspirate might somehow be an inherited feature of the perfect.
8 Bartholomae, AiW col. 1863.19–20.
9 δέδορκϵν +, ἔοικα -+-, λϵληκώς +, μϵμηκώς, τέηκα, πϵφρίκασι +; ἄνωγα +, ἔοργας +, κϵκληγώς +, ἀνέῳγϵ +, πέπηγϵν +, πϵπληγώς +, ἕρριγα +, τϵτρίγϵι +, πϵφϵυγότϵς +; δϵδουπότος, ἔολπα +, κϵκοπώς, λέλοιπϵν +, δπωπα +, σέσηπϵ. At least two-thirds of these have intransitive or middle meanings, capable of taking an accusative only as ‘inner object’, if at all.
10 K. Meisterhans, Grammatik der attischen Inschriften2 §2.3.d-e. Cf. the writing
on the Nicandra inscription of Naxos, and ναχσιος = Nάξιος on other Naxian inscc. Cf. also Sturtevant, Pronunciation of Greek and Latin2 §98.
11 Buck, Comp. Gram. of Greek and Latin §405.
12 An apparent extension of β and γ in some inscriptional dialect-forms may be artificial; cf. Ed. Schwyzer, Griechische Grammatik 772.44–7.
13 For a gathering of the materials and an interpretation by analogical influences, see K. Brugmann and A. Thumb, Griechische Grammatik4 375; Buck, Comp. Gramm. of Greek and Latin §405; Schwyzer, Griech. Gram. 769–72.