No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2026
[Greek perfects in -ϕα or -χα from verb-stems ending in π, κ, or γ owe the aspiration to Indo-Hittite perfect endings beginning with a voiceless laryngeal: 1st sg. -xa and 3d pl.
.]
1 Zur Geschichte des Perfects im Indogermanischen mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Griechisch und Lateinisch 284-323 (1884).
2 KZ 27.311-3 (1885), 28.176-84 (1887).
3 Griechische Grammatik1 423 (1880).
4 For the system of Indo-Hittite laryngeals with which I operate, see Lang. 16.81-7, especially 81 and fn. 2. The first laryngeal rather than another must be assumed in this ending because of Lat. -ē- and the lack of a written laryngeal in Hittite.
5 De Saussure, BSL 34.CXVIII (1892); Cuny, Revue de phonétique 2.118-20 (1912). Cf. Kurylowicz, Études indoeuropéennes 1.46-72, who correctly concludes that γ voices a preceding voiceless mute (Skt. pibati from IH pi-bγe-ti in my writing), while the other three laryngeals aspirate such a sound (e.g. Skt. tiṣṭhati < IH ti-st'.-eti). Kurylowicz is wrong in confining this aspiration to Indo-Iranian, as is shown by Gk.
= Skt. vettha and by the aspirates discussed in this paper.
6 Whitney, Sanskrit Grammar 287, §798a. Cf. Edgerton, Lang. 10.243 and fn.2.
7 Av. vaozirəm (3d pl. plup. middle of vaz- ‘travel’) also points to IE ə, since IE
appears as a in A vestan.
8 This does not amount to proof. Attic
may be older than
, and prehistoric Attic may have had *
.
9 This suggestion I owe to Sapir. On the Hittite ḫi- conjugation, see Sturtevant and Bechtel, Lang. 14.10-9.
10 KZ 39. 253. Now that we see the justification for the aspiration, we need not share the scepticism of Brugmann-Thumb, Griech. Gramm. 375 and of Schwyzer, Griech. Gramm. 772.