Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:40:52.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ilse Lehiste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Obituary
Information
Language , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 384 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Linguistic Society of America

References

Atal, Bishnu S., Kent, Raymond D.; and Miller, Joanne L. (eds.) 1991. Papers in speech communication: Speech processing. New York: Acoustical Society of America.Google Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter, and Catford, John C.. 1999. History of the phonetic sciences at the University of Michigan. A guide to the history of the phonetic sciences in the United States: Issued on the occasion of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by Ohala, John J., Bronstein, Arthur Jordan, Grazia Busà, M., Lewis, Julie A., and Weige, William F., 58–61. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jeffers, Robert J., and Lehiste, Ilse. 1979. Principles and methods for historical linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Raymond D., Atal, Bishnu S.; and Miller, Joanne L. (eds.) 1991. Papers in speech communication: Speech production. New York: Acoustical Society of America.Google Scholar
Kingston, John, and Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1975. A course in phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1984. ‘Out of chaos comes order’: Physical, biological, and structural patterns in phonetics. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Utrecht, 83–95.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1948. Über die Ethik der nach altnordischen Quellen geschaffenen Werke von William Morris. Hamburg: University of Hamburg dissertation.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica 5 (supplement 1), 5–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1961. Some acoustic correlates of accent in Serbo-Croatian. Phonetica 7.114–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1965a. Some acoustic characteristics of dysarthric speech. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1965b. The function of quantity in Finnish and Estonian. Language 41.447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1966. Consonant quantity and phonological units in Estonian. Bloomington: Indiana University, and The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse (ed.) 1967. Readings in acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1972. The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51.6..2018–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1977. Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics 5.3. 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1988. Lectures on language contact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 2001. Prosodic change in progress: From quantity language to accent language. Development in prosodic systems, ed. by Paula, Johanna Fikkert, Monique and Jacobs, Haike, 47–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, and Ivić, Pavle. 1963. Accent in Serbo-Croatian: An experimental study. (Michigan Slavic materials 4.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, and Ivić, Pavle. 1986. Word and sentence prosody in Serbocroatian. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, Olive, Joseph P.; and Streeter, Lynne A.. 1972. Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60.5. 1199–202.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, and Peterson, Gordon E.. 1961a. Transitions, glides, and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33.3. 268–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, and Peterson, Gordon E.. 1961b. Some basic considerations in the analysis of intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33.4. 419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, and Peterson, Gordon E.. 1961c. Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33.4. 428–35.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, Teras, Pire, Ernštreits, Valts, Lippus, Pärtel, Pajusalu, Karl, Tuisk, Tuuli; and Viitso, Tiit-Rein. 2008. Livonian prosody. (Suomalais-ugrilaisen Seuran toimituksia 255.) Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan, and Lindblom, Björn. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48.839–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. Speech production and speech modelling, ed. by Hardcastle, William J. and Marchal, Alain, 403–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, Guion, Susan, Hura, Susan, Moon, Seung-Jae; and Willerman, Raquel. 1995. Is sound change adaptive? Rivista di Linguistica 7.5–37.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne L., Kent, Raymond D.; and Atal, Bishnu S. (eds.) 1991. Papers in speech communication: Speech perception. New York: Acoustical Society of America.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1975. Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. Nasalfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, ed. by Ferguson, Charles A., Hyman, Larry M., and Ohala, John J., 289–316. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Language Universals Project.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. Chicago Linguistic Society 17.2. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1991. The integration of phonetics and phonology. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Aix-en-Provence, 1–16.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, ed. by Jones, Charles, 237–78. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E., and Barney, Harold L.. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24.2. 175–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E., and Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32.6. 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Beckman, Mary E.. 1988. Japanese tone structure. (Linguistic inquiry monograph 15.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Jaan, and Lehiste, Ilse. 1994. Lost prosodic oppositions: A study of contrastive duration in Estonian funeral laments. Language and Speech 37.4. 407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Jaan, and Lehiste, Ilse. 1998. Timing in Estonian folk songs as interaction between speech prosody, meter, and musical rhythm. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 15.4. 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Jaan, and Lehiste, Ilse. 2001. The temporal structure of Estonian runic songs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar