Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T18:34:14.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indo-European reconstruction and historical methodologies

Review products

The new sound of Indo-European: Essays in phonological reconstruction. Edited by TheoVennemann. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 41.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1989. Pp. xvi, 300. Cloth $84.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Andrew Garrett
Andrew Garrett*
Affiliation:
Stanford University and University of Texas, Austin
*
Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2150
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Language , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 790 - 804
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

For references, comments, and discussion I am very grateful to Juliette Blevins. Mark Hale, Jay Jasanoff, Bob King, Craig Melchert, Sally Thomason, and Calvert Watkins.

References

Adjarian, H. 1909. Classification des dialectes arméniens. (Bibliothèque de l'École des hautes études, Sciences historiques et philologiques, 173.) Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1950. Notes on the phonetics of an Eastern Armenian speaker. Transactions of the Philological Society 1950.180–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1951. Phonetics and comparative linguistics. Archivum Linguisticum 3.126–36.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1953. Phonetics in ancient India. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bammesberger, Alfred (ed.) 1988. Die Laryngaltheorie und die Rekonstruktion des indogermanischen Laut- und Formensystems. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1935. Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1958. Sur la phonétique et la syntaxe de l'arménien classique. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 54.46–68.Google Scholar
Karl, Brugmann. 1930. Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. 2nd edn. (Grundiss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, 1) Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collinge, N. E. 1975. Lachmann's Law revisited. Folia Linguistica 8.223–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1984. Review of Bono homini donum: Essays in historical linguistics in memory of J. Alexander Kerns, ed. by Arbeitman, Yoël & Allan, R. Bomhard (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1981). Kratylos 29.1–13.Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek (ed.) 1978. Recent developments in historical phonology. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamkrelidze, T., and Ivanov, V. 1973. Sprachtypologie und die Rekonstruktion der gemeinindogermanischen Verschlüsse. Phonetica 27.150–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greppin, John C, and Khachaturian, Amalya A. 1986. A handbook of Armenian dialectology. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. M. 1989. The Indo-European language and the history of its speakers: The theories of Gamkrelidze and Ivanov. Lingua 78.37–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J.; and Ewan, William G. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the developments of tones. Lg. 55.37–58.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1973. Glottalized and murmured occlusives in Indo-European. Glossa 7.141–65.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1958. Typological studies and their contribution to historical comparative linguistics. Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists. ed. by Sivertsen, Eva et al., 17–25. Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. On comparative linguistics: The case of Grassmann's Law. Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas A., 115–34. (Current trends in linguistics, 11.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederick. 1978. Comments on W. Winter's paper. In Fisiak 1978:447.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1927. indoeuropéen et h hittite. Symbolae grammaticae in honorem Ioannis Rozwadowki, vol. 1.95–104. Cracoviae: Gebethner & Wolff.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1982. A course in phonetics. 2nd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lindeman, Fredrik Otto. 1987. Introduction to the ‘laryngeal theory’. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. Lautlehre (Segmentale Phonologie des Indogermanischen). Indogermanische Grammatik, ed. by Kuryłowicz, Jerzy & Mayrhofer, Manfred, vol. 1.73–181. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1922. Les dialectes indo-européens. 2nd edn. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine, and Vendryes, Joseph. 1979. Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. 5th edn. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. Craig. 1987. PIE velars in Luvian. In Watkins, 182–204.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1904. Armenisch und die Nachbarsprachen. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 39.334–485.Google Scholar
Pisowicz, Andrzej. 1976. Le développement du consonantisme arménien. (Polska akademia nauk—Oddział w Krakowie, Prace komisji językoznawstwa, 43.) Wrocław: Zakłod Narodowy imienia Ossolinskich.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1879 [1878]. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. 1887 reprint Paris: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Schindler, Jochem. 1977. A thorny problem. Die Sprache 23.25–35.Google Scholar
Schlerath, Bernfried (ed.) 1985. Grammatische Kategorien, Funktion und Geschichte. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Vogt, Hans. 1958. Les occlusives de l'arménien. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 18.143–61.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert (ed.) 1987. Studies in memory of Warren Cowgill (1929–1985). Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Werner. 1965. Tocharian evidence. Evidence for laryngeals, ed. by Winter, Werner, 190–211. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Werner. 1978. The distribution of short and long vowels in stems of the type Lith. s ti: vèsti and OCS jasti: vesti: mesti in Baltic and Slavic languages. In Fisiak, 431–45.Google Scholar